Best practices: How to evaluate psychological science for use by organizations

Research in Organizational Behavior

Volumn 31, Issue , 2011, Pages 253-275

  Fiske, Susan T ^a   Borgida, Eugene ^b  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 82955228876     PISSN: 01913085     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.riob.2011.10.003     Document Type: Review

References (169)

1. American Sociological Association and the Law and Society Association Brief of amici curiae, in support of respondents, in the U.S. Supreme Court, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Betty Dukes, et al., No. 10-277.
2. Anderson C.A., Bushman B.J. External validity of "trivial" experiments: The case of laboratory aggression. Review of General Psychology 1997, 1(1):19-41.
3. Anderson C.A., Gentile D.A. Media violence, aggression, and public policy. Psychological science in the courtroom: Beyond common sense 2008, 281-300. Blackwell, London. E. Borgida, S.T. Fiske (Eds.).
4. Anderson C.A., Shibuya A., Ihori N., Swing E.L., Bushman B.J., Sakamoto A., et al. Violent video game effects on aggression, empathy, and prosocial behavior in Eastern and Western countries: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin 2010, 136(2):151-173.
5. Anderson N., Ones D.S., Sinangil H.K., Viswesvaran C. Handbook of industrial, work, and organizational psychology 2001, Sage, London.
6. Aquino K., Thau S. Workplace victimization: Aggression from the target's perspective. Annual Review of Psychology 2009, 60:717-741.
7. Argyris C. Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness 1974, Jossey-Bass, Washington.
8. Argyris C., Schön D.A. Organizational learning II: Theory, method, and practice 1996, Addison-Wesley, New York.
9. Bailar J.C., Patterson K. Journal peer review: The need for a research agenda. New England Journal of Medicine 1985, March 7, 312(10):654-657.
10. Banaji M.R., Crowder R.G. The bankruptcy of everyday memory. American Psychologist 1989, 44(9):1185-1193.
11. Banks R.R., Eberhardt J.L., Ross L. Race, crime, and antidiscrimination. Psychological science in the courtroom: Beyond common sense 2008, 3-22. Blackwell, London. E. Borgida, S.T. Fiske (Eds.).
12. Bargh J.A., McKenna K.Y.A. The Internet and social life. Annual Review of Psychology 2004, 55:573-590.
13. Barling J., Dupré K.E., Kelloway E.K. Predicting workplace aggression and violence. Annual Review of Psychology 2009, 60:671-692.
14. Bartunek J.M., Rynes S.L. The construction and contributions of "Implications for Practice": What's in them and what might they offer?. Academy of Management Learning and Education 2010, 9(1):100-117.
15. Bastardi A., Uhlmann E.L., Ross L. Wishful thinking: Belief, desire, and the motivated evaluation of scientific evidence. Psychological Science 2011, XX(X):1-2.
16. Bedeian A.G. Peer review and the social construction of knowledge in the management discipline. Academy of Management Learning & Education 2004, 3(2):198-216.
17. Bem D.J. Feeling the future: Experimental evidence for anomalous retroactive influences on cognition and affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2011, 100(3):407-425.
18. Benard S., Paik I., Correll S.J. Cognitive bias and the motherhood penalty. Hastings Law Journal 2008, 59:1359-1387.
19. Blair-Loy M. Competing devotions: Career and family among female executives 2003, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
20. Psychological science in the courtroom: Beyond common sense 2008, Blackwell, London. E. Borgida, S.T. Fiske (Eds.).
21. Bornstein R.F. Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968-1987. Psychological Bulletin 1989, 106:265-289.
22. Brief A.P., Dukerich J.M. Theory in organizational behavior: Can it be useful?. Research in Organizational Behavior 1991, 13:327-352.
23. Brief A.P., Weiss H.M. Organizational behavior: Affect in the workplace. Annual Review of Psychology 2002, 53(1):279-307.
24. Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Ass'n, 131 S.Ct. 2729 (2011).
25. Budig M.J., England P. The wage penalty for motherhood. American Sociological Review 2001, 66(2):204-225.
26. Bushman B.J., Anderson C.A. Media violence and the American public: Scientific facts versus media misinformation. American Psychologist 2001, 56(6-7):477-489.
27. Chubin D.E., Hackett E.J. Peerless science: Peer review and U.S. science policy 1990, SUNY Press, Albany.
28. Cialdini R.B. Full-cycle social psychology. Applied social psychology annual 1980, Vol. 1:21-47. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA.
29. Cohen-Charash Y., Spector P.E. The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2001, 86(2):278-321.
30. Cohen-Charash Y., Spector P.E. The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis: Erratum. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2002, 89(2):1215.
31. Committee to Review the Scientific Evidence on the Polygraph. (2003). The polygraph and lie detection. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
32. Copus D. Avoiding junk science: A lawyer's view. Employment discrimination litigation: Behavioral, quantitative, and legal perspectives 2005, 450-462. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco. F.J. Landy (Ed.).
33. Correll S.J., Benard S., Paik I. Getting a job: Is there a motherhood penalty?. American Journal of Sociology 2007, 112:1297-1338.
34. Crosby F.J., Dovidio J. Discrimination in America and legal strategies for reducing it. Psychological science in the courtroom: Beyond common sense 2008, 3-22. Blackwell, London. E. Borgida, S.T. Fiske (Eds.).
35. Cuddy A.J.C., Fiske S.T., Glick P. When professionals become mothers, warmth doesn't cut the ice. Journal of Social Issues 2004, 60:701-718.
36. Cuddy A.J.C, Fiske S.T., Glick P. The BIAS map: Behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2007, 92:631-648.
37. Cuddy A.J.C., Fiske S.T., Kwan V.S.Y., Glick P., Demoulin S., Leyens J-Ph., et al. Is the stereotype content model culture-bound? A cross-cultural comparison reveals systematic similarities and differences. British Journal of Social Psychology 2009, 48:1-33.
38. Cuddy, A. J. C., & Glick, P. (2011). Causes and consequences of warmth and competence judgments in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, doi:10.1016/j.riob.2011.10.004.
39. Cumming, A. (2007, December 10). Polygraph Use by the Department of Energy: Issues for Congress. Congressional report. Library of Congress. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service. Handle/proxy. Url:, Vol. 20, p. 53. http://handle.dtic.mil/100.2/ADA480718.
40. Cutler B.L., Kovera M.B. Expert psychological testimony. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2011, 20(1):53-57.
41. Diamond S.S. Psychological contributions to evaluating witness testimony. Beyond common sense: Psychological science in the courtroom 2008, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford. E. Borgida, S.T. Fiske (Eds.).
42. The Sage Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination 2010, Sage, Los Angeles, CA. J.F. Dovidio, M. Hewstone, P. Glick, V.M. Esses (Eds.).
43. Durante, F., Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Kervyn, N., Akande, A., Adetoun, B. E., et al. (submitted for publication). Nations' income inequality predicts ambivalence in stereotype content: How societies mind the gap.
44. Eagly A.H., Carli L.L. Through the labyrinth: The truth about how women become leaders 2007, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
45. Eagly A.H., Crowley M. Gender and helping behavior: A meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature. Psychological Bulletin 1986, 100(3):283-308.
46. Eagly A.H., Johannesen-Schmidt M.C., van Engen M.L. Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychological Bulletin 2003, 129(4):569-591.
47. Eagly A.H., Johnson B.T. Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 1990, 108(2):233-256.
48. Eagly A.H., Karau S.J. Gender and the emergence of leaders: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1991, 60(5):685-710.
49. Eagly A.H., Karau S.J. Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review 2002, 109:573-598.
50. Eagly A.H., Karau S.J., Makhijani M.G. Gender and the effectiveness of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 1995, 117(1):125-145.
51. Eagly A.H., Karau S.J., Miner J.B., Johnson B.T. Gender and motivation to manage in hierarchic organizations: A meta-analysis. The Leadership Quarterly 1994, 5(2):135-159.
52. Eagly A.H., Koenig A.M. Gender prejudice: On the risks of occupying incongruent roles. Psychological science in the courtroom: Beyond common sense 2008, 63-82. Blackwell, London. E. Borgida, S.T. Fiske (Eds.).
53. Eagly A.H., Makhijani M.G., Klonsky B.G. Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 1992, 111(1):3-22.
54. Eagly A.H., Steffen V.J. Gender and aggressive behavior: A meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature. Psychological Bulletin 1986, 100(3):309-330.
55. Eagly A.H., Wood W. Explaining sex differences in social behavior: A meta-analytic perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1991, 17(3):306-315.
56. Eckes T. Paternalistic and Envious Gender stereotypes: Testing predictions from the stereotype content model. Sex Roles 2002, 47:99-114.
57. Eisenhart M. The paradox of peer review: Admitting too much or allowing too little?. Research in Science Education 2002, 32:241-255.
58. Faigman D.L. Evidentiary incommensurability: A preliminary exploration of the problem of reasoning from general scientific data to individualized legal decision-making. Brooklyn Law Review 2010, 75(4):1-22.
59. Faigman D.L., Dasgupta N., Ridgeway C.L. A matter of fit: The law of discrimination and the science of implicit bias. Hastings Law Journal 2008, 59:1389-1434.
60. Fiske D.W., Fogg L.F. But the reviewers are making different criticisms of my paper! Diversity and uniqueness in reviewer comments. American Psychologist 1990, 45(5):591-598.
61. Fiske S.T. Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping. American Psychologist 1993, 48:621-628.
62. Fiske S.T. Envy up scorn down: How status divides us 2011, Russell Sage Foundation, New York.
63. Fiske, S. T. (in press). Managing ambivalent prejudices: The smart-but-cold, and the warm-but-dumb stereotypes. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences.
64. Fiske S.T., Bersoff D.N., Borgida E., Deaux K., Heilman M.E. Social science research on trial: The use of sex stereotyping research in Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins. American Psychologist 1991, 46:1049-1060.
65. Fiske S.T., Borgida E. Providing expert knowledge in an adversarial context: Social cognitive science in employment discrimination cases. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 2008, 4:123-148.
66. Fiske S.T., Borgida E. Standards for using social psychological evidence in employment discrimination cases. Temple Law Review. 2011, 83(4):101-111.
67. Fiske S.T., Cuddy A.J.C., Glick P. Universal dimensions of social perception: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Science 2007, 11:77-83.
68. Fiske S.T., Cuddy A.J.C., Glick P., Xu J. A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2002, 82:878-902.
69. Fiske S.T., Taylor S.E. Social cognition: From brains to culture 2008, McGraw-Hill, New York.
70. Fitzgerald L.F., Collingsworth L.L. (Un)common knowledge: The legal viability of sexual harassment research. Psychological science in the courtroom: Beyond common sense 2008, 103-126. Blackwell, London. E. Borgida, S.T. Fiske (Eds.).
71. Fogg L., Fiske D.W. Foretelling the judgments of reviewers and editors. American Psychologist 1993, 48(3):293-294.
72. Gilovich T.D., Griffin D.W. Judgment and decision-making. The handbook of social psychology 2010, Vol. 1:542-588. Wiley, New York.
73. Guest D.E. Don't shoot the messenger: A wake-up call for academics. Academy of Management Journal 2007, 50:1020-1026.
74. Harris L.T., McClure S.M., van den Bos W., Cohen J.D., Fiske S.T. Regions of MPFC differentially tuned to social and non-social affective evaluation. Cognitive and Behavioral Neuroscience 2007, 7:309-316.
75. Hart M., Secunda P.M. A matter of context: Social framework evidence in employment discrimination class actions. Fordham Law Review 2009, 78:37-70.
76. Hedges L.V. How hard is hard science, how soft is soft science? The empirical cumulativeness of research. American Psychologist 1987, 42:443-455.
77. Heilman M.E. Sex bias in work settings: The lack of fit model. Research in Organizational Behavior 1983, 5:269-298.
78. Heilman M.E., Haynes M.C. Subjectivity in the appraisal process: A facilitator of gender bias in work settings. Psychological science in the courtroom: Beyond common sense 2008, 127-156. Blackwell, London. E. Borgida, S.T. Fiske (Eds.).
79. Heilman M.E., Okimoto T.G. Motherhood: A potential source of bias in employment decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology 2008, 93(1):189-198.
80. Henrich J., Heine S.J., Norenzayan A. The weirdest people in the world?. Behavioral and brain sciences 2010, 33:61-135.
81. Henrich J., Heine S.J., Norenzayan A. Nature 2010, July 1, 466:29.
82. Henry P.J. Institutional bias. The Sage Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination 2010, 426-440. Sage, Newburg Park, CA. J.F. Dovidio, M. Hewstone, P. Glick, V.M. Esses (Eds.).
83. Hodgkinson G.P., Healey M.P. Cognition in organizations. Annual Review of Psychology 2008, 59:387-417.
84. Hoobler J.M., Wayne S.J., Lemmon G. Bosses' perceptions of family-work conflict and women's promotability: Glass ceiling effects. Academy of Management Journal 2009, 52(5):939-957.
85. Huesmann L.R. Nailing the coffin shut on doubts that violent video games stimulate aggression: Comment on Anderson et al. Psychological Bulletin 2010, 136(2):179-181.
86. Iacono W.G. Polygraph testing. Psychological science in the courtroom: Beyond common sense 2008, 219-236. Blackwell, London. E. Borgida, S.T. Fiske (Eds.).
87. Iacono W.G., Lykken D.T. The case against polygraph tests. Modern scientific evidence: The law and science of expert testimony 2005, Vol. 4:605-655. West, Eagan MN.
88. Jost J.T., Rudman L.A., Blair I.V., Carney D.R., Dasgupta N., Glaser J., et al. The existence of implicit bias is beyond reasonable doubt: A refutation of ideological and methodological objections and executive summary of ten studies that no manager should ignore. Research in Organizational Behavior 2009, 29:39-69.
89. Kahan D.M., Hoffman D.A., Braman D. Whose eyes are you going to believe? Scott v. Harris and the perils of cognitive illiberalism. Harvard Law Review 2009, 122(3):837-906.
90. Kahneman D. Daniel Kahneman. A history of psychology in autobiography 2007, 155-197. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC. L. Gardner, W.M. Runyan (Eds.).
91. Kang S.K., Inzlicht M., Derks B. Social neuroscience and public policy on intergroup relations: A Hegelian analysis. Journal of Social Issues 2010, 66(3):585-601.
92. Kassin S.M. Expert testimony on the psychology of confessions: A pyramidal framework of the relevant science. Psychological science in the courtroom: Beyond common sense 2008, 195-218. Blackwell, London. E. Borgida, S.T. Fiske (Eds.).
93. Kassin S.M., Drizin S.A., Grisso T., Gudjonsson G.H., Leo R.A., Redlich A.D. Police-induced confessions: Risk factors and recommendations. Law and Human Behavior 2010, 34:3-38.
94. Kassin S.M, Ellsworth P.C., Smith V.L. The "general acceptance" of psychological research on eyewitness testimony: A survey of the experts. American Psychologist 1989, 44:1089-1098.
95. Kervyn, N., Fiske, S. T., & Malone, C. (in press). Do we perceive brands like we perceive people? Applying the Stereotype Content Model to brand perception. Journal of Consumer Psychology.
96. King E.B. The effect of bias on the advancement of working mothers: Disentangling legitimate concerns from inaccurate stereotypes as predictors of advancement in academe. Human Relations 2008, 61(12):1677-1711.
97. st century: Are science and the law aligned?. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 2011, 17(1):54-75.
98. Klenowski P.M., Bell K.J., Dodson K.D. An empirical evaluation of juvenile awareness programs in the United States: Can juveniles be "Scared Straight?" Journal of Offender Rehabilitation 2010, 49:254-272.
99. Koenig A.M, Eagly A.H., Mitchell A.A., Ristikari T. Are leader stereotypes masculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms. Psychological Bulletin 2011, 137(4):616-642.
100. Kovera M.B., Borgida E. Social psychology and the law. Handbook of social psychology 2010, 1343-1385. Wiley, New York. 5th ed. S.T. Fiske, D.T. Gilbert, G. Lindzey (Eds.).
101. Kovera M.B., McAuliff B.D. The effects of peer review and evidence quality on judge evaluations of psychological science: Are judges effective gatekeepers?. Journal of Applied Psychology 2000, 85:574-586.
102. Krieger L.H., Fiske S.T. Behavioral realism in employment discrimination law: Implicit bias and disparate treatment. California Law Review 2006, 94:997-1062.
103. Kunda Z. Motivated inference: Self-serving generation and evaluation of causal theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1987, 53:636-647.
104. Landy F.J. The tenuous bridge between research and reality: The importance of research design in inferences regarding work behavior. Psychological science in the courtroom: Beyond common sense 2008, 341-352. Blackwell, London. E. Borgida, S.T. Fiske (Eds.).
105. Lewin K., Grabbe P. Conduct, knowledge, and the acceptance of new values. Journal of Social Issues 1945, 1(3):53-64.
106. Lipsey M.W Research and relevance: A survey of graduate students and faculty in psychology. American Psychologist 1974, 29(7):541-553.
107. Locke E.A. Generalizing from laboratory to field: Ecological validity or abstraction of essential elements?. Generalizing from laboratory to field settings: Research findings from industrial-organizational psychology, organizational behavior, and human resource management 1986, 3-10. Lexington Books, Lexington, MA. E.A. Locke (Ed.).
108. Locke E.A. Editor's Introduction. Handbook of principles of organizational behavior: Indispensible knowledge for evidence-based management 2009, xxv-xxx. Wiley, New York. 2nd ed. E.A. Locke (Ed.).
109. Locke E.A., Latham G.P. Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist 2002, 57(9):705-717.
110. Loftus E.F., Garry M., Hayne H. Repressed and recovered memory. Psychological science in the courtroom: Beyond common sense 2008, 177-194. Blackwell, London. E. Borgida, S.T. Fiske (Eds.).
111. McAuliff B.D., Kovera M.B., Nunez G. Can jurors recognize missing control groups, confounds, and experimenter bias in psychological science?. Law and Human Behavior 2009, 33:247-257.
112. Mellers B., Hertwig R., Kahneman D. Do frequency representations eliminate conjunction effects? An exercise in adversarial collaboration. Psychological Science 2001, 12:269-275.
113. Miller C.C. From the editors: Peer review in the organizational and management sciences: Prevalence and effects of reviewer hostility, bias, and dissensus. Academy of Management Journal 2006, 49(3):425-431.
114. Miner J.B. The validity and usefulness of theories in an emerging organizational science. Academy of Management Review 1984, 9:306-926.
115. Mitchell, G., Monahan, J., & Walker, L. (2011a, April). The ASA's missed opportunity to promote sound science in court. SSRN Electronic paper Collection: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1816752.
116. Mitchell G., Walker L., Monahan J. Beyond context: Social facts as case-specific evidence. Emory Law Journal 2011, 60:1109-1155.
117. Monahan J., Walker L., Mitchell G. Contextual evidence of gender discrimination: The ascendance of "social frameworks" Virginia Law Review 2008, 94:1715-1749.
118. Mullen B., Brown R., Smith C. Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration. European Journal of Social Psychology 1992, 22(2):103-122.
119. Mullen B., Copper C. The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. Psychological Bulletin 1994, 115(2):210-227.
120. Murrie D.C., Boccaccini M.T., Johnson J.T., Janke C. Does interrater (dis)agreement on Psychopathy Checklist scores in sexual violent predator trials suggest partisan allegiance in forensic evaluations?. Law and Human Behavior 2008, 32:352-362.
121. Nelson T.D The young science of prejudice against older adults: Established answers and open questions about ageism. Psychological science in the courtroom: Beyond common sense 2008, 45-62. Blackwell, London. E. Borgida, S.T. Fiske (Eds.).
122. Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination. 2009, Psychology Press, New York. T.D. Nelson (Ed.).
123. Nisbett R.E., Ross L. Human inferences: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment 1980, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
124. Norton M.I., Vandello J.A., Darley J.M. Casuistry and social category bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2004, 87(6):817-831.
125. Olson G.M., Olson J.S. Human-computer interaction: Psychological aspects of the human use of computing. Annual Review of Psychology 2003, 54:491-516.
126. Ordóñez L.D., Schweitzer M.E., Galinsky A.D., Bazerman M.H. Goals gone wild: The systematic side effects of overprescribing goal setting. The Academy of Management Perspectives 2009, 23(1):6-16.
127. Ostrom T.M., Sedikides C. Out-group homogeneity effects in natural and minimal groups. Psychological Bulletin 1992, 112(3):536-552.
128. Paluck E.L., Green D.P. Prejudice reduction: What works? A review and assessment of research and practice. Annual Review of Psychology 2009, 60:339-367.
129. Pettigrew T.F., Tropp L.R. A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2006, 90(5):751-783.
130. Pettigrew T.F., Tropp L.R. How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta-analytic tests of three mediators. European Journal of Social Psychology 2008, 38(6):922-934.
131. Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. I. (2006, January 1-13). Evidence-based management. Harvard Business Review: Decision Making. OnPoint Article. Retrieved April 3, 2011, from http://www.hbr.orgwww.hbr.org/.
132. Plaut V.C. Diversity science: Why and how difference makes a difference. Psychological Inquiry 2010, 21:77-99.
133. Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins, 490 U.S. 228 (1989).
134. Pronin E., Gilovich T., Ross L. Objectivity in the eye of the beholder: Divergent perceptions of bias in self versus others. Psychological Review 2004, 111(3):781-799.
135. Raelin J.A. Refereeing the game of peer review. Academy of Management Learning and Education 2008, 7(1):124-129.
136. Ridgeway C.L. Social status and group structure. Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Group processes 2001, 352-375. Blackwell, Malden, MA. M.A. Hogg, S. Tindale (Eds.).
137. Ridgeway C.L., Correll S.J. Motherhood as a status characteristic. Journal of Social Issues 2004, 60:683-700.
138. Robinson v. Jacksonville Shipyards, Inc. (M.D. Fla. 1989; Case No. 86-927).
139. Ross L., Greene D., House P. The false consensus effect: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1977, 13(3):279-301.
140. Rousseau D.M. Is there such a thing as "evidence-based management" ?. The Academy of Management Review 2006, 31(2):256-269.
141. Rudman L.A., Borgida E. The afterglow of construct accessibility: The behavioral consequences of priming men to view women as sexual objects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1995, 31(6):493-517.
142. Rudman L.A., Glick P., Phelan J.E. From the laboratory to the bench: Gender stereotyping research in the courtroom. Psychological science in the courtroom: Beyond common sense 2008, 83-102. Blackwell, London. E. Borgida, S.T. Fiske (Eds.).
143. Rynes S.L. "Getting on board" with AMJ: Balancing quality and innovation in the review process. Academy of Management Journal 2006, 49(6):1097-1102.
144. Rynes S.L., Giluk T.L., Brown K.G. The very separate worlds of academic and practitioner periodicals in human resource management: Implications for evidence-based management. Academy of Management Journal 2007, 50(5):987-1008.
145. Schacter D.L., Dawes R., Jacoby L.L., Kahneman D., Lempert R., Roediger H.L., et al. Policy forum: Studying eyewitness investigations in the field. Law and Human Behavior 2008, 32:3-5.
146. Sears D.O. College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology's view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1986, 51(3):515-530.
147. Smith A.N., Brief A.P., Colella A. Bias in organizations. The Sage Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination 2010, 441-456. Sage, Newburg Park, CA. J.F. Dovidio, M. Hewstone, P. Glick, V.M. Esses (Eds.).
148. Stangor C., McMillan D. Memory for expectancy-congruent and expectancy-incongruent information: A review of the social and social developmental literatures. Psychological Bulletin 1992, 111(1):42-61.
149. Staw B.M. The trouble with JDM: Some limitations to the influence of JDM on organizational research. Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2010, 3:411-416.
150. Staw B.M, Epstein L.D. What bandwagons bring: Effects of popular management techniques on corporate performance, reputation, and CEO pay. Administrative Science Quarterly 2000, 45(3):523-556.
151. Sue D.W., Capodilupo C.M., Torino G.C., Bucceri J.M., Holder A.M.B., Nadal K.L., et al. Racial microaggressions in everyday life: Implications for clinical practice. American Psychologist 2007, 62(4):271-286.
152. Tetlock. (2010, January 22). Deposition testimony in EEOC v. Bloomberg L.P. U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, Case #07-CV-8383.
153. Tetlock P.E., Mitchell G. Implicit bias and accountability systems: What must organizations do to prevent discrimination?. Research in Organizational Behavior 2009, 29:3-38.
154. Tetlock P.E., Mitchell G., Murray T.L. The challenge of debiasing personnel decisions: Avoiding both under-and overcorrection. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice 2008, 1(4):439-443.
155. Tropp L.R, Mallett R.K. Moving beyond prejudice reduction: Pathways to positive intergroup relations 2011, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
156. Tropp L.R., Pettigrew T.F. Differential relationships between intergroup contact and affective and cognitive dimensions of prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2005, 31(8):1145-1158.
157. Tsang E.W.K, Frey B.S. The as-is journal review process: Let authors own their ideas. Academy of Management Learning and Education 2007, 6(1):128-136.
158. Vallone R.P., Ross L., Lepper M.R. The hostile media phenomenon: Biased perception and perceptions of media bias in coverage of the Beirut massacre. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1985, 49:577-585.
159. van den Bos W., McClure S.M., Harris L.T., Fiske S.T., Cohen J.D. Dissociating affective evaluation and social cognitive processes in ventral medial prefrontal cortex. Cognitive and Behavioral Neuroscience 2007, 7:337-346.
160. van Knippenberg D., Schippers M.C. Work group diversity. Annual Review of Psychology 2007, 58:515-541.
161. Vinchur A.J., Koppes L.L. A historical survey of research and practice in industrial and organizational psychology. APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology 2011, Vol. 1:3-36. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
162. Walsh J.P., Tushman M.L., Kimberly J.R., Starbuck B., Ashford S. On the relationship between research and practice: Debate and reflections. Journal of Management Inquiry 2007, 16:128-154.
163. Weber E.U., Johnson E.J. Mindful judgment and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology 2009, 60:53-85.
164. Welch J., Byrne J.A. Jack: Straight from the gut 2001, Warner, New York.
165. Weller A.C. Editorial peer review: Its strengths and weaknesses 2001, Information Today, American Society for Information Science and Technology, Medford, NJ.
166. Wells G.L., Hasel L.E. Eyewitness identification: Issues in common knowledge and generalization. Psychological science in the courtroom: Beyond common sense 2008, 159-176. Blackwell, London. E. Borgida, S.T. Fiske (Eds.).
167. Williams J.C. Reshaping the work-family debate: Why men and class matter 2010, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
168. Wojciszke B. Morality and competence in person and self-perception. European Review of Social Psychology 2005, 16:155-188.
169. Zedeck S. Introduction. APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology 2011, Vol. 1:xxi-xxxiv. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.