Head-to-head comparison of three commonly used preoperative tools for prediction of lymph node invasion at radical prostatectomy

Urology

Volumn 78, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1363-1367

  Abdollah, Firas ^a,b   Schmitges, Jan ^a,c   Sun, Maxine ^a   Thuret, Rodolphe ^a,d   Djahangirian, Orchidee ^a,e   Tian, Zhe ^a   Shariat, Shahrokh F ^a   Briganti, Alberto ^b   Perrotte, Paul ^a,e   Montorsi, Francesco ^b   Karakiewicz, Pierre I ^a,e  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b VITA SALUTE SAN RAFFAELE UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

^d UNIV MONTPELLIER   (France)

^e WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; CANCER INVASION; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURGERY; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; D'AMICO RISK CLASSIFICATION; DECISION CURVE ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; LYMPH NODE DISSECTION; LYMPH NODE INVASION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NOMOGRAM; PARTIN TABLE; PELVIS LYMPH NODE DISSECTION; PREDICTION; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; PROSTATE ADENOCARCINOMA; PROSTATECTOMY;

EID: 82955227990     PISSN: 00904295     EISSN: 15279995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.07.1423     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. A. Briganti, M.L. Blute, and J.H. Eastham Pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer Eur Urol 55 2009 1251 1265
2. A. Heidenreich, G. Aus, and M. Bolla EAU guidelines on prostate cancer Eur Urol 53 2008 68 80
3. S.A. Joslyn, and B.R. Konety Impact of extent of lymphadenectomy on survival after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer Urology 68 2006 121 125
4. T.A. Masterson, F.J. Bianco, and A.J. Vickers The association between total and positive lymph node counts, and disease progression in clinically localized prostate cancer J Urol 175 2006 1320 1324 [Discussion:1324-1325]
5. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology Prostate cancer 2010
6. Heidenreich A, Bolla M, Joniau S, et al. European Association of Urology, Guidelines on Prostate Cancer: EAU Clinical Guidelines, 2010.
7. M.R. Cooperberg, D.P. Lubeck, and M.V. Meng The changing face of low-risk prostate cancer: trends in clinical presentation and primary management J Clin Oncol 22 2004 2141 2149
8. J.O. Ung, J.P. Richie, and M.H. Chen Evolution of the presentation and pathologic and biochemical outcomes after radical prostatectomy for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer diagnosed during the PSA era Urology 60 2002 458 463
9. J.B. Yu, D.V. Makarov, and R. Sharma Validation of the partin nomogram for prostate cancer in a national sample J Urol 183 2010 105 111
10. A. Briganti, F.K. Chun, and A. Salonia Validation of a nomogram predicting the probability of lymph node invasion based on the extent of pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer BJU Int 98 2006 788 793
11. I. Cagiannos, P. Karakiewicz, and J.A. Eastham A preoperative nomogram identifying decreased risk of positive pelvic lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer J Urol 170 2003 1798 1803
12. D.V. Makarov, B.J. Trock, and E.B. Humphreys Updated nomogram to predict pathologic stage of prostate cancer given prostate-specific antigen level, clinical stage, and biopsy Gleason score (Partin tables) based on cases from 2000 to 2005 Urology 69 2007 1095 1101
13. A.V. D'Amico, R. Whittington, and S.B. Malkowicz Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer JAMA 280 1998 969 974
14. S.A. Boorjian, R.J. Karnes, and L.J. Rangel Mayo Clinic validation of the D'Amico risk group classification for predicting survival following radical prostatectomy J Urol 179 2008 1354 1360 [Discussion:1360-1361]
15. L.A.G. Ries, D. Melbert, and M. Krapcho SEER Cancer Statistics Review:1975-2004 Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute http://seer.cancer.gov/ csr/1975-2004/ (Based on 2006 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER Web site, 2007.)
16. B.F. Hankey, L.A. Ries, and B.K. Edwards The surveillance, epidemiology, and end results program: a national resource Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 8 1999 1117 1121
17. L.C. Harlan, and B.F. Hankey The surveillance, epidemiology, and end-results program database as a resource for conducting descriptive epidemiologic and clinical studies J Clin Oncol 21 2003 2232 2233
18. Y.N. Wong, N. Mitra, and G. Hudes Survival associated with treatment vs observation of localized prostate cancer in elderly men JAMA 296 2006 2683 2693
19. J.A. Hanley, and B.J. McNeil A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases Radiology 148 1983 839 843
20. A.J. Vickers, and E.B. Elkin Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models Med Decis Mak 26 2006 565 574
21. P.I. Karakiewicz, N. Bhojani, and U. Capitanio External validation of the updated Partin tables in a cohort of North American men J Urol 180 2008 898 902 [Discussion:902-903]
22. A. Briganti, U. Capitanio, and F.K. Chun Impact of surgical volume on the rate of lymph node metastases in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection for clinically localized prostate cancer Eur Urol 54 2008 794 802
23. F. Abdollah, M. Sun, and R. Thuret Decreasing rate and extent of lymph node staging in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy may undermine the rate of diagnosis of lymph node metastases in prostate cancer Eur Urol 58 2010 882 892
24. M.E. Allaf, G.S. Palapattu, and B.J. Trock Anatomical extent of lymph node dissection: impact on men with clinically localized prostate cancer J Urol 172 2004 1840 1844
25. A. Heidenreich, Z. Varga, and R. Von Knobloch Extended pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy: high incidence of lymph node metastasis J Urol 167 2002 1681 1686
26. A. Briganti, S.F. Shariat, and F.K. Chun Differences in the rate of lymph node invasion in men with clinically localized prostate cancer might be related to the continent of origin BJU Int 100 2007 528 532
27. M. Han, P.B. Snow, and J.M. Brandt Evaluation of artificial neural networks for the prediction of pathologic stage in prostate carcinoma Cancer 91 2001 1661 1666
28. J.A. Karam, R.S. Svatek, and P.I. Karakiewicz Use of preoperative plasma endoglin for prediction of lymph node metastasis in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer Clin Cancer Res 14 2008 1418 1422