Resurgence in home haemodialysis: Perspectives from the UK

NDT Plus

Volumn 4, Issue SUPPL. 3, 2011, Pages

  Mitra, Sandip ^a   Brady, Mark ^b   O'Donoghue, Donal ^b  

^a MANCHESTER ROYAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

^b Department of Health ^*  (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

barriers; haemodialysis; home; initiatives

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC ASPECT; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HEMODIALYSIS; HOME CARE; HOME DIALYSIS; HUMAN; PATIENT AUTONOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 82955219646     PISSN: 17530784     EISSN: 17530792     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ndtplus/sfr133     Document Type: Review

References (13)

1. Eknoyan G, Beck GJ, Cheung AK et al. Effect of dialysis dose and membrane flux in maintenance hemodialysis. N Engl J Med 2002; 347: 2010-2019 (Pubitemid 35461657)
2. Anonymous. Guidance on home compared with hospital haemodial-ysis for patients with end-stage renal failure. Technology Appraisal Guideline No 48. London, UK: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, 2002
3. Department of Health. The National Service Framework for Renal Services; Part One: Dialysis and Transplantation. London, UK: HMSO, 2004
4. Porter ME, Teisberg EO. Redefining Health Care: Creating Value-Based Competition on Results. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press; 2006
5. Department of Health. Achieving Excellence in Kidney Care, Delivering the National Service Framework for Renal Services. London, UK: HMSO; 2009
6. Department of Health. High Quality Care for All. NHS Next Stage Review Final Report. 2008. http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod-consum-dh/groups/dh-digitalassets/ @dh/@en/documents/digitalasset/dh-085828.pdf
7. Mactier R, Mitra S, Boakes S et al. Renal Association Working Party on Home Haemodialysis, 2010. http://www.renal.org/Libraries/Publications/RA-Home- HD-Working-Party-Report-January-2010. sflb.ashx (31 October 2011, date last accessed)
8. Byrne C, Steenkamp R, Castledine C et al. UK Renal Registry 12th Annual Report 2009: chapter 4: ESRD prevalent rates in 2008: national and centre-specific analyses. Nephron Clin Pract 2010; 115 (Suppl 1): c41-c68
9. Ananthapavan J, Lowin J, Bloomfield E. Economic Report-Home Haemodialysis. 2010. http://www.quantafs.com/img/uploads/files/documents/ CEP10063-%20economic%20report-home%20haemodialysis.pdf (12 September 2010, date last accessed)
10. NHS Kidney Care. Improving Choice for Kidney Patients: The Carer and Patient Viewpoint. http://www.kidneycare.nhs.uk/Library/NHSKCcarer- patientviewpoint.pdf (12 September 2010, date last accessed).
11. Better Kidney Care For All. NHS Kidney Care Improving Choice Work Programme. http://www.kidneycare.nhs.uk/-Ourwork-programmes-Preparation- Improvingchoice.aspx (12 July 2011, date last accessed)
12. Nitsch D, Steenkamp R, Tomson CRV et al. Outcomes in patients on home haemodialysis in England and Wales, 1997-2005: a comparative cohort analysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2011; 26: 1670-1677
13. http://www.guardian.co.uk/healthcare-network/2011/jun/06/ manchester-royal-infirmary-home-dialysis-innovation?INTCMP=SRCH (31 October 2011, date last accessed).