Tax and accounting rules: Some recent developments

European Business Review

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 92-97

  Aisbitt, Sally ^a  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY BUSINESS SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Financial reporting; Harmonization; International accounting; International standards; Taxation

Indexed keywords

EID: 82955219221     PISSN: 0955534X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/09555340210420064     Document Type: Review

References (22)

1. Artsberg, K. (1996), “The link between commercial accounting and tax accounting in Sweden”, European Accounting Review, Vol. 5, Supplement, pp. 795-814.
2. Blake, J., Akerfeldt, K., Fortes, H. and Gowthorpe, C. (1997), “The relationship between tax and accounting rules – the Swedish case”, European Business Review, Vol. 97 No. 2, pp. 85-91.
3. Chauveau, B. (1995), “The Spanish Plan General de Contabilidad – Agent of development and innovation?”, European Accounting Review, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 125-38.
4. Christiansen, M. (1995), “The history of financial reporting in Denmark”, in Walton, P., European Financial Reporting: A History, Academic Press, pp. 55-73.
5. Christiansen, M. (1996), “The relationship between accounting and taxation in Denmark”, European Accounting Review, Vol. 5, Supplement, pp. 815-33.
6. Christiansen, M. and Elling, J.O. (1993), Denmark, Routledge.
7. Davies, M., Paterson, R. and Wilson, A. (1999), UK GAAP, 6th ed., Butterworths, London.
8. Eilifsen, Aa. (1996), “The relationship between accounting and taxation in Norway”, European Accounting Review, Vol. 5, Supplement, pp. 835-44.
9. European Commission (2000) EU Financial Reporting Strategy: the Way Forward, COM (2000) 359, www.europa.eu.int/comm/internal_market.
10. Fagerstrom, A. and Schwencke, H.R. (1994), “Why is deferred tax treated differently in Norwegian and Swedish consolidated accounts?”, Norwegian School of Management Working Paper 1994/12, Sandvika.
11. Frydlender, A. and Pham, D. (1996), “Relationships between accounting and taxation in France”, European Accounting Review, Vol. 5, Supplement, pp. 845-57.
12. Hoogendoorn, M.N. (1996), “Accounting and taxation in Europe – a comparative overview”, European Accounting Review, Vol. 5, Supplement, pp. 783-94.
13. Inland Revenue (1999a), “Interaction of tax law and accountancy practice”, Tax Bulletin, Vol. 44, December, pp. 707-9.
14. Inland Revenue (1999b), “Interaction of tax law and accountancy practice: recent developments”, Tax Bulletin, Vol. 40, April, pp. 636-41.
15. Inland Revenue (2000), “Revenue accountants”, Tax Bulletin, Vol. 47, June, pp. 758-9.
16. Johansen, C. (1981), “Forslaget til en regnsabslov”, Revision og Regnskabsvæsen, pp. 218-31.
17. Kinserdal, A. (1995), “The history of financial reporting in Norway”, in Walton, P., European Financial Reporting: A History, Academic Press, pp. 189-202.
18. Lamb, M., Nobes, C.W. and Roberts, A.D. (1998), “International variations in the connections between tax and financial reporting”, Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 28 No. 3, pp. 173-89.
19. Niskanen, J. (2000), “Earnings cosmetics in a tax-driven accounting environment: evidence from Finnish public firms”, European Accounting Review, Vol. 9 No. 3, pp. 443-52.
20. Pirinen, P. (1996), “The 1992 reform of Finnish accounting legislation”, PhD thesis, University of Jyväskylä.
21. Schwencke, H.R. and Alexander, D. (1996), “Accounting changes in Norway”, Proceedings of EAA 96, EAA, Bergen.
22. SOU (1994), Års- och koncernredovisning enligt EG-direktive, Delbetänkande av Redovisningskommittén, Justitiedepartementet, p. 17.