In the relation of workflow and trust characteristics, and requirements in service workflows

Communications in Computer and Information Science

Volumn 251 CCIS, Issue PART 1, 2011, Pages 492-506

  Viriyasitavat, Wattana ^a,b   Martin, Andrew ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b CHULALONGKORN UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SERVICE-BASED; TRUST AND SECURITY; VALUE ADDED SERVICE; VIRTUAL ORGANIZATION; WORK-FLOWS;

CLOUD COMPUTING;

INFORMATION SCIENCE;

EID: 82955189776     PISSN: 18650929     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-25327-0_42     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (40)

1. Altunay, M., Brown, D., Byrd, G., Dean, R.: Trust-based Secure Workflow Path Construction. In: Benatallah, B., Casati, F., Traverso, P. (eds.) ICSOC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3826, pp. 382-395. Springer, Heidelberg (2005) (Pubitemid 43856199)
2. Arenas, A.E.: Survey material on trust and security in grids. CoreGRID Project Deliverable D.IA.03 (2005)
3. Botha, R.A., Eloff, J.H.P.: A security interpretation of the workflow reference model. In: von Solms, R., Eloff, J.H.P. (eds.) Proceedings of WG 11.2 and WG 11.1 of IFIP TC11, Information Security - from Small Systems to Management of Infrastructures, Vienna, Austria, vol. 2, pp. 43-50 (September 2, 1998)
4. Das, S., Kochut, K., Miller, J., Sheth, A., Worah, D.: Orbwork: A reliable distributed corba-based workflow enactment system for meteor2 (1996)
5. Dogac, A., Ozsu, T., Kalinichenko, L. (eds.): Workflow Management Systems and Interoperability, 1st edn. Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., Secaucus (2001)
6. Ellis, C., Keddara, K., Rozenberg, G.: Dynamic change within workflow systems. In: Proceedings of Conference on Organizational Computing Systems, COCS 1995, pp. 10-21. ACM, New York (1995)
7. Fox, G., Gannon, D.:Workflow in grid systems. In: Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, pp. 1009-1019 (2006)
8. Hang, C.-W., Singh, M.P.: Trustworthy service selection and composition. ACM Trans. Auton. Adapt. Syst. 6, 1-17 (2011)
9. Hayes, J.G., Peyrovian, E., Sarin, S., Schmidt, M.-T., Swenson, K.D., Weber, R.: Workflow interoperability standards for the internet. IEEE Internet Computing 4, 37-45 (2000)
10. Jøsang, A., Ismail, R., Boyd, C.: A survey of trust and reputation systems for online service provision (2006)
11. Kagal, L., Finin, T., Peng, Y.: A delegation based model for distributed trust (2001)
12. Kamvar, S.D., Schlosser, M.T., Garcia-Molina, H.: The eigentrust algorithm for reputation management in p2p networks. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference onWorldWideWeb,WWW2003, pp. 640-651. ACM, New York (2003)
13. Kim, Y., Doh, K.-G.: Trust type based semantic web services assessment and selection. In: Proc. 10th Int. Conf. Advanced Communication Technology ICACT 2008, vol. 3, pp. 2048-2053 (2008)
14. Koshutanski, H.: A survey on distributed access control systems for web business processes. I. J. Network Security 9(1), 61-69 (2009)
15. Kuntze, N., Schmidt, A.U., Velikova, Z., Rudolph, C.: Trust in business processes. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference for Young Computer Scientists, ICYCS 2008, pp. 1992-1997. IEEE Computer Society, Hunan (2008)
16. Kuntze, N., Schutte, J.: Securing decentralized workflows in ambient environments. In: Proc. IEEE/IFIP Int. Conf. Embedded and Ubiquitous Computing EUC 2008, vol. 2, pp. 361-366 (2008)
17. Lorch, M., Adams, D.B., Kafura, D., Koneni, M.S.R., Rathi, A., Shah, S.: The prima system for privilege management, authorization and enforcement in grid environments. In: Proceedings of the 4th InternationalWorkshop on Grid Computing, GRID 2003, p. 109. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA (2003)
18. Lu, Y., Zhang, L., Sun, J.: Types for task-based access control in workflow systems. IET Software 2(5), 461-473 (2008)
19. Lynch, C.A.: When documents deceive: trust and provenance as new factors for information retrieval in a tangled web. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 52, 12-17 (2001)
20. Marinescu, D.C.: A grid workflow management architecture. GGF White Paper (2002)
21. Moodahi, I., Gudes, E., Lavee, O., Meisels, A.: A Secure Workflow Model Based on Distributed Constrained Role and Task Assignment for the Internet. In: López, J., Qing, S., Okamoto, E. (eds.) ICICS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3269, pp. 171-186. Springer, Heidelberg (2004) (Pubitemid 39737138)
22. Moreau, L., Chapman, S., Schreiber, A., Hempel, R., Varga, L., Cortes, U., Willmott, S.: Provenance-based trust for grid computing position paper (2004)
23. Muth, P., Wodtke, D., Weinenfels, J., Dittrich, A.K., Weikum, G.: From centralized workflow specification to distributed workflow execution. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems 10, 159-184 (1998)
24. Naqvi, S., Coregrid, T.: A study of languages for the specification of grid security policies 1. Technical Report TR0037 (2006)
25. Pagani, D.S., Pareschi, R.: Generalized process structure grammars gpsg for flexible representations of work. In: Conference on Computer Supported CooperativeWork, pp. 180-189 (1996)
26. Page, L., Brin, S., Motwani, R., Winograd, T.: The pagerank citation ranking: Bringing order to the web (1998)
27. Pearlman, L., Welch, V., Foster, I., Kesselman, C., Tuecke, S.: A community authorization service for group collaboration. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Policies for Distributed Systems and Networks (POLICY 2002), p. 50. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA (2002)
28. Qiu, Z.M., Wong, Y.S.: Dynamic workflow change in pdm systems. Comput. Ind. 58, 453-463 (2007)
29. Rajbhandari, S., Rana, O.F., Wootten, I.: A fuzzy model for calculating workflow trust using provenance data. In: Proceedings of the 15th ACM Mardi Gras Conference: From Lightweight Mash-ups to Lambda Grids: Understanding the Spectrum of Distributed Computing Requirements, Applications, Tools, Infrastructures, Interoperability, and the Incremental Adoption of Key Capabilities, MG 2008, pp. 10:1-10:8. ACM, New York (2008)
30. Ramchurn, S., Sierra, C., Godo, L., Jennings, N.R.: A computational trust model for multi-agent interactions based on confidence and reputation. In: 6th International Workshop of Deception, Fraud and Trust in Agent Societies, pp. 69-75 (2003)
31. Ramchurn, S.D., Huynh, D., Jennings, N.R.: Trust in multi-agent systems. The Knowledge Engineering Review 19 (2004)
32. Sabater, J., Sierra, C.: Regret: A reputation model for gregarious societies (2000)
33. Sarin, S.K.: Object-oriented workflow technology in inconcert. In: COMPCON, pp. 446-450 (1996)
34. Simmhan, Y.L., Plale, B., Gannon, D.: A survey of data provenance in e-science. Sigmod Record 34, 31-36 (2005)
35. Stevens, R.D., Robinson, A.J., Goble, C.A.: myGrid: personalised bioinformatics on the information grid. Bioinformatics 19(suppl. 1) (2003)
36. Viriyasitavat, W.: Modeling delegation in requirements-driven trust framework. In: Proc. World Conf. Services - I, pp. 522-529 (2009)
37. Viriyasitavat, W., Martin, A.: Formal trust specification in service workflows. In: Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Embedded and Ubiquitous Computing, EUC 2010, pp. 703-710. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA (2010)
38. Viriyasitavat, W., Martin, A.: Towards the relationship of trust properties and workflow characteristics. To be published in the 7th Asian Internet Engineering Conference (AINTEC) (2011)
39. Witkowski, M., Artikis, A., Pitt, J.: Experiments in building experiential trust in a society of objective-trust based agents. In: Autonomous Agents & Multiagent Systems/International Conference on Autonomous Agents, pp. 111-132 (2000)
40. Wodtke, D., Weikum, G.: A formal foundation for distributed workflow execution based on state charts. In: International Conference on Database Theory, pp. 230-246 (1997)