Stormwater BMP treatment performance variability for sediment and heavy metals

Separation and Purification Technology

Volumn 84, Issue , 2012, Pages 95-103

  Fassman, Elizabeth ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

BMP effectiveness; International BMP Database; Low impact development; National Water Quality Database; Performance evaluation; Water quality

Indexed keywords

BMP DATABASE; BMP EFFECTIVENESS; LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT; NATIONAL WATER QUALITY DATABASE; PERFORMANCE EVALUATION;

ANOXIC SEDIMENTS; COPPER; DATABASE SYSTEMS; EFFLUENTS; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY; HEAVY METALS; HEAVY WATER; PAVEMENTS; QUALITY CONTROL; SITE SELECTION; WATER QUALITY; WATER TREATMENT; ZINC;

CHEMICALS REMOVAL (WATER TREATMENT);

EID: 82955187762     PISSN: 13835866     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2011.06.033     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Statistics New Zealand. New Zealand statistics. 2007 [cited 2010.].
2. Timperley, M., et al., Sources and load of metals in urban stormwater. 2005, Final report for the Auckland Regional Council: Auckland, New Zealand.
3. Boston Consulting Group, Auckland regional stormwater project and action plan to deliver improved stormwater outcomes. 2004, Final report for the Auckland Regional Council and Infrastructure Auckland: Auckland, New Zealand.
4. Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council (ANZECC), Australian and New Zealand guidelines for fresh and marine water quality 2000, New Zealand Ministry for the Environment and Australian Water Association, Editor. 2000: Wellington, New Zealand.
5. R.B. Williamson, S. Kelly, Regional discharges project marine receiving environment status report 2003, technical publication 203. 2003, Auckland Regional Council: Auckland, New Zealand.
6. Green, M., et al. Predicting long term contaminant runoff and accumulation in the central Waitemata and Southeastern Manukau Harbours (New Zealand). in 17th Congress of the IAHR-APD and 7th International Urban Watershed Management Conference. 2010. Auckland, New Zealand.
7. NIWA Science. Summary climate information for selected New Zealand locations. 2000 [cited 2008 10 Oct.].
8. K.D. Young Application of the analytical hierarchical process for improved selection of storm-water BMPs Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 135 4 2009 264 275
9. L. Scholes, D.M. Revitt, and J.B. Ellis A systematic approach for the comparative assessment of stormwater pollutant removal potentials Journal of Environmental Management 88 3 2008 467 478 (Pubitemid 351696568)
10. E. Strecker Determining urban storm water BMP effectiveness Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 127 3 2001 144 149 (Pubitemid 32454029)
11. Wright water engineers and geosyntec consultants, frequently asked questions fact sheet for the International Stormwater BMP Database Project: why does the International Stormwater BMP Database Project omit percent removal as a measure of BMP performance? 2007: .
12. Geosyntec consultants and Wright water engineers, urban Stormwater BMP performance monitoring. 2009, prepared under support from the US Environmental Protection Agency, Water Environment Research Foundation, Federal Highway Administration and Environmental and Water Resources Institute of the American society of civil engineers: .
13. T. Gardner, H. Goss, B. Cole. Introduction to water quality standards. USEPA Watershed Academy 01 webcast 2009 [cited 07/06/2010].
14. D. Ackerman, and E.D. Stein Evaluating the effectiveness of best management practices using dynamic modeling Journal of Environmental Engineering 134 8 2008 628 639 (Pubitemid 352028479)
15. Strecker, E., et al. Stormwater BMP evaluation and feasibility study - An assessment of the ability of BMPs to be able to meet potential TMDLs for Lake Tahoe. in World Water Congress 2005: Impacts of global climate change - Proceedings of the 2005 World Water and Environmental Resources Congress 2005. Anchorage, AK.
16. G. Burton, and R. Pitt Stormwater Effects Handbook 2002 CRC Press, Lewis Publishers New York (pp. 911)
17. M.E. Barrett Comparison of BMP performance using the international BMP database Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 134 5 2008 556 561
18. R. Pitt, A. Maestre, National Stormwater Quality Database v. 3, in . 2008, Accessed 02/03/2010.
19. T. Schueler Irreducible pollutant concentrations discharged from stormwater practices. Technical note #74 Watershed Protection Techniques 2 2 1996 369 372
20. Auckland Regional Council, proposed Auckland regional plan: Air, Land, and Water, Auckland Regional Council, Editor. 2005: Auckland, New Zealand.
21. H. Li, and A.P. Davis Heavy metal capture and accumulation in bioretention media Environmental Science and Technology 42 14 2008 5247 5253
22. H. Li, and A.P. Davis Water quality improvement through reductions of pollutant loads using bioretention Journal of Environmental Engineering 135 8 2009 567 576
23. A.P. Davis Water quality improvement through bioretention: lead, copper, and zinc removal Water Environment Research 75 1 2006 73 82
24. A.P. Davis Field performance of bioretention: water quality Environmental Engineering Science 24 2007 1048 1064 (Pubitemid 47614428)
25. J.R. Ermilio, R.G. Traver. Hydrologic and pollutant removal performance of a bio-infiltration BMP. in: World Environmental and Water Resources Congress. May 21-25, 2006. Omaha, NE.
26. H.M. Altaher Factors Affecting Mobility of Copper in Soil-Water Matrices, in Civil and Environmental Engineering 2001 Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Blacksburg, VA
27. J.M. Howell, and J.M. Gawthorne Copper in Animals and Man vol. I 1987 CRC Press, Inc. Boca Raton, FL