Effects of temperature and light on photosynthetic heterosis of an upland cotton hybrid cultivar

Crop Science

Volumn 52, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 282-291

  Zeng, Bin ^a,b   Xu, Xiaoming ^a   Zhou, Shixiang ^c   Zhu, Chunshen ^c   Tang, Canming ^a  

^a NANJING AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b Tianjin Crops Research Institute   (China)

^c Cotton Research Institute of Hunan ^*  (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 82955176904     PISSN: 0011183X     EISSN: 14350653     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2011.03.0165     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Ahmadzadeh, A., E.A. Lee, and M. Tollenaar. 2004. Heterosis for leaf CO2 exchange rate during the grain-filling period in maize. Crop Sci. 44:2095-2100. doi:10.2135/cropsci2004.2095
2. Amani, I., R.A. Fischer, and M.P. Reynolds. 1996. Canopy temperature depression association with yield of irrigated spring wheat cultivars in a hot climate. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 176:119-129. doi:10.1111/j.1439-037X.1996.tb00454.x
3. Bhatt, J.G., and M.R.K. Rao. 1980. Heterosis in growth and photosynthetic rate in hybrids cotton. Euphytica 30:129-133.doi:10.1007/BF00033668
4. Blum, A. 1990. A variation among wheat cultivars in the response of leaf gas exchange to light. J. Agric. Sci. (Cambridge) 115:305-311.doi:10.1017/S0021859600075717
5. Burke, J.J., and D.R. Upchurch. 1989. Leaf temperature and transpirational control in cotton. Environ. Exp. Bot. 29:487-492.doi:10.1016/0098-8472(89)90027-0
6. Chen, Z.H., F.B. Wu, X.D. Wang, and G.P. Zhang. 2005. Heterosis in CMS hybrids of cotton for photosynthetic and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters. Euphytica 144:353-361. doi:10.1007/s10681-005-8188-y
7. Cornish, K., J.W. Radin, E.L. Turcotte, Z.M. Lu, and E. Zeiger. 1991. Enhanced photosynthesis and stomatal conductance of Pima cotton (Gossypium barbadense L.) breed for increased yield. Plant Physiol. 97:484-489. doi:10.1104/pp.97.2.484
8. Dong, H.Z., W.J. Li, Z.H. Li, and W. Tang. 2000. Comparative studies on the intensity of photosynthesis between Bt transgenic hybrid cotton and its parents. Acta Agric. Nucl. Sin. 14:284-289.
9. Dundee Scientific. 1999. Photosyn assistant, version 1.1.2. Dundee Scientific, Dundee, UK.
10. El-Sharkawy, M.A., and J.D. Hesketh. 1964. Effects of temperature and water deficit on leaf photosynthetic rates of different species. Crop Sci. 4:514-518. doi:10.2135/cropsci1964.001118 3X000400050024x
11. Fischer, R.A., D. Rees, K.D. Sayre, Z.M. Lu, A.G. Condon, and A. Larque-Saavedra. 1998. Wheat yield progress associated with a higher stomatal conductance and photosynthetic rate, and cooler canopies. Crop Sci. 38:1467-1475. doi:10.2135/cro psci1998.0011183X003800060011x
12. Idso, S., R.J. Reginato, and J.W. Radin. 1982. Leaf diffusion resistance and photosynthesis in cotton as related to a foliage temperature based plant water stress index. Agric. Meteorol. 27:27-34. doi:10.1016/0002-1571(82)90016-4
13. Lawlor, D.W. 1995. Photosynthesis, productivity and environment. J. Exp. Bot. 46:1449-1461.
14. Li, X., Z.S. Ding, L.L. Li, M.Y. Wang, and M. Zhao. 2007. Heterosis of photosynthetic performance of maize. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol. 18:1049-1054.
15. Lu, Z.M., J.W. Chen, R.G. Percy, and E. Zeiger. 1997. Photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance and leaf area in two cotton species (Gossypium barbadense and Gossypium hirsutum) and their relation with heat resistant and yield. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 24:693-700. doi:10.1071/PP97056
16. Lu, Z.M., R.G. Percy, C.O. Qualset, and E. Zeiger. 1998. Stomatal conductance predicts yields in irrigated Pima cotton and bread wheat grown at high temperatures. J. Exp. Bot. 49:453-460. doi:10.1093/jexbot/49.suppl_1.453
17. Lu, Z.M., J.W. Radin, E.L. Turcotte, R. Percy, and E. Zeiger. 1994a. High yields in advanced lines of Pima cotton are associated with higher stomatal conductance, reduced leaf area and lower leaf temperature. Physiol. Plant. 92:266-272. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.1994.tb05336.x
18. Lu, Z.M., and E. Zeiger. 1994b. Selection for higher yields and heat resistance in Pima cotton has caused genetically determined changes in stomatal conductances. Physiol. Plant. 92:273-278. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.1994.tb05337.x
19. Mahan, J.R., and D.R. Upchurch. 1988. Maintenance constant leaf temperature by plants. II. Experimental observation in cotton. Environ. Exp. Bot. 28:359-366. doi:10.1016/0098-8472(88)90059-7
20. Microsoft Corporation. 2003. Microsoft professional edition 2003, version11.5612.5602. Microsoft Corporation, Bellevue, WA.
21. Mojayad, F., and C. Planchon. 1994. Stomatal and photosynthetic adjustment to water deficit as the expression of heterosis in sunflower. Crop Sci. 34:103-107. doi:10.2135/cropsci1994.00 11183X003400010018x
22. Muramoto, H., J.D. Hesketh, and M.A. El-Sharkway. 1965. Relationships among rate of leaf area development, photosynthetic rate, and dry matter production among American cultivated cottons and other species. Crop Sci. 5:163-166. doi:10.2135/ cropsci1965.0011183X000500020020x
23. Pallas, J.E., J.B.E. Michel, and D.G. Harris. 1967. Photosynthesis, transpiration, leaf temperature, and stomatal activity of cotton plants under varying water potentials. Plant Physiol. 42:76-88. doi:10.1104/pp.42.1.76
24. Percy, R.G., Z.M. Lu, J.W. Radin, E.L. Turcotte, and E. Zeiger. 1996. Inheritance of stomatal conductance in cotton (Gossypium barbadense). Plant Sci. 96:389-394.
25. Radin, J.W., Z. Lu, R.G. Percy, and E. Zeiger. 1994. Genetic variability for stomatal conductance in Pima cotton and its relation to improvements of heat adaptation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:7217-7221. doi:10.1073/pnas.91.15.7217
26. Rahman, H.U. 2005. Genetic analysis of stomatal conductance in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) under contrasting temperature regimes. J. Agric. Sci. 143:161-168. doi:10.1017/ S0021859605005186
27. Reynolds, M.P., M. Balota, M.I.B. Delgado, I. Amani, and R.A. Fischer. 1994. Physiological and morphological traits associated with spring wheat yield under hot, irrigated conditions. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 21:717-730. doi:10.1071/PP9940717
28. Robert, B.H., and R.K. Daniel. 1983. Photosynthetic rate control in cotton stomatal and nonstomatal factors. Plant Physiol. 73:658-661. doi:10.1104/pp.73.3.658
29. Wells, R., and W.R. Meredith, Jr. 1986. Heterosis in upland cotton. I. Growth and leaf area partitioning. Crop Sci. 26:1119-1123. doi:10.2135/cropsci1986.0011183X002600060006x
30. Wells, R., W.R. Meredith, Jr., and J.R. Williford. 1988. Heterosis in upland cotton. II. Relationship of leaf area to plant photosynthesis. Crop Sci. 28:522-525. doi:10.2135/cropsci1988.001 1183X002800030020x
31. Wise, R.R., A.J. Olson, S.M. Schrader, and T.D. Sharkey. 2004. Electron transport is the functional limitation of photosynthesis in field-grown Pima cotton plants at high temperature. Plant Cell Environ. 27:717-724. doi:10.1111/ j.1365-3040.2004.01171.x
32. Yang, X.H., X.Y. Chen, Q.Y. Ge, B. Li, Y.P. Tong, A.M. Zhang, Z.S. Li, T.Y. Kuang, and C.M. Lu. 2006. Tolerance of photosynthesis to photoinhibition, high temperature and drought stress in flag leaves of wheat: A comparison between a hybridization line and its parents grown under field conditions. Plant Sci. 171:389-397. doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2006.04.010
33. Yu, Q., B.H. Ren, T.D. Wang, and S.F. Sun. 1998. A simulation of diurnal variations of photosynthesis of C3 plant leaves. Sci. Atmos. Sin. 22:867-880.
34. Zelitch, I. 1982. The close relationship between net photosynthesis and crop yield. Bioscience 32:796-802. doi:10.2307/1308973
35. Zeng, B. 2008. Heterosis for yield in three upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) hybrids and their physiological basis. M.S. diss. Univ. of Nanjing Agri, Nanjing, China.
36. Zeng, B., Q.Y. Wang, and C.M. Tang. 2008. Anatomic analysis on heterosis in three transgenic Bt pest-resistant hybrid cotton (G. hirsutum L.). Acta Agron. Sin. 34:496-505. doi:10.3724/ SP.J.1006.2008.00496