Gibbs artifact reduction by nonnegativity constraint

Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 213-219

  Zeng, Gengsheng L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Gibbs artifacts; Image processing; Lucy Richardson algorithm; MLEM algorithm; Postprocessing; Ringing artifacts

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT REDUCTION; ATTENUATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTROL STRATEGY; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; SINGLE PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY;

ALGORITHMS; ARTIFACTS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, EMISSION-COMPUTED, SINGLE-PHOTON;

EID: 82855163942     PISSN: 00914916     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.110.086439     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Richardson WH. Bayesian-based iterative method of image restoration. J Opt Soc Am. 1972;62:55-59.
2. Lucy LB. An iterative technique for the rectification of observed distributions. Astron J. 1974;79:745-754.
3. Snyder DL, Schulz TJ, O'Sullivan JA. Deblurring subject to nonnegativity constraints. IEEE Trans Signal Process. 1992;40:1143-1150.
4. Shepp LA, Vardi Y. Maximum-likelihood reconstruction for emission tomography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1982;MI-1:113-122.
5. Snyder DL, Miller MI, Thomas LJ Jr, Politte DG. Noise and edge artifacts in maximum-likelihood reconstructions for emission tomography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1987;6:228-238.
6. Joyce LS, Root WL. Precision bounds in superresolution processing. J Opt Soc Am A. 1984;1:149-168.
7. Magain P, Courbin F, Sohy S. Deconvolution with correct sampling. Astrophys J. 1998;494:472-477.
8. Boussion N, Cheze Le Rest C, Hatt M, Visvikis D. Incorporation of waveletbased denoising in iterative deconvolution for partial volume correction in whole-body PET imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009;36:1064-1075.
9. Lindenbaum M, Fischer M, Bruckstein M. On Gabor's contribution to image enhancement. Pattern Recognit. 1994;27:1-8.
10. Perona P, Malik J. Scale space and edge detection using anisotropic diffusion. IEEE Trans Patt Anal Mach Intell. 1990;12:629-639.
11. Rudin L, Osher S, Fatemi E. Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms. Physica D. 1992;60:259-268.
12. Tadmor E, Nezzar S, Vese L. A multiscale image representation using hierarchical (BV, L2) decompositions. Multiscale Model Simul. 2004;2:5554-5579.
13. Yaroslavsky LP. Digital Picture Processing: An Introduction. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 1985.
14. Ordentlich E, Seroussi G, Verdú S, Weinberger M, Weissman T. A discrete universal denoiser and its application to binary images. In: Proc ICIP. 2003 117-120.
15. Awate SP, Whitaker RT. Unsupervised, information-theoretic, adaptive image filtering for image restoration. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2006;28:364-376.
16. Snyder DL, Miller MI. The use of sieves to stabilize images produced with the EM algorithm for emission tomography. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 1985;NS-32:3864-3872.
17. Zeng GL, Allred RJ. Partitioned image filtering for reduction of the Gibbs phenomenon. J Nucl Med Technol. 2009;37:96-100.
18. Bertero M, Boccacci P. A simple method for the reduction of boundary effects in the Richardson-Lucy approach to image deconvolution. Astron Astrophys. 2005; 437:369-374.
19. van Kempen GMP, van Vliet LJ. Background estimation in nonlinear image restoration. J Opt Soc Am A. 2000;17:425-433.