Determinants of government size: Evidence from China

Public Choice

Volumn 151, Issue 1-2, 2012, Pages 255-270

  Wu, Alfred M ^a   Lin, Mi ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Fiscal decentralization; Government size; Openness to trade; Scale effects; Wagner's law

Indexed keywords

EID: 82755194990     PISSN: 00485829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11127-010-9746-y     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Akitoby, B., Clements, B., Gupta, S., & Inchauste, G. (2006). Public spending, voracity, and Wagner's law in developing countries. European Journal of Political Economy, 22(4), 908-924.
2. Alesina, A., & Wacziarg, R. (1998). Openness, country size and government. Journal of Public Economics, 69(3), 305-321.
3. Andrews, R., & Boyne, G. A. (2009). Size, structure and administrative overheads: An empirical analysis of English local authorities. Urban Studies, 46(4), 739-759.
4. Brennan, G., & Buchanan, J. M. (1980). The power to tax: Analytical foundations of a fiscal constitution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Brødsgaard, K. E. (2002). Institutional reform and the bianzhi system in China. The China Quarterly, 170, 361-386.
6. Burns, J. P. (2001). Public sector reform and the state: The case of China. Public Administration Quarterly, 24(4), 419-436.
7. Burns, J. P. (2003). "Downsizing" the Chinese state: Government retrenchment in the 1990s. The China Quarterly, 175, 775-802.
8. Burns, J. P. (2007). Civil service reform in China. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 7(1), 57-81.
9. Chen, C. (2004). Fiscal decentralization, collusion and government size in China's transitional economy. Applied Economics Letters, 11(11), 699-705.
10. Cole, M. A., Elliott, R. J. R., & Zhang, J. (2009). Corruption, governance and FDI location in China: A province-level analysis. Journal of Development Studies, 45(9), 1494-1512.
11. Congleton, R. D. (2001). The politics of government growth. In L. Razzolini & W. F. Shughart (Eds.), The Elgar companion to public choice (pp. 457-478). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
12. Cooke, F. L. (2003). Seven reforms in five decades: Civil service reform and its human resource implications in China. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 8(3), 380-404.
13. Cusack, T. R., Notermans, T., & Rein, M. (1989). Political-economic aspects of public employment. European Journal of Political Research, 17(4), 471500.
14. Deng, X. (1984). Selected works of Deng Xiaoping, 1975-1982. Beijing: Foreign Languages Press.
15. De Witte, K., & Moesen, W. (2010). Sizing the government. Public Choice, 145, 39-55.
16. Ehdaie, J. (1994). Fiscal decentralization and the size of government. Washington: The World Bank.
17. Esping-Andersen, G. (1996). Welfare states in transition: National adaptations in global economies. London: Sage.
18. Ferris, J. S., Park, S. P., & Winer, S. L. (2008). Studying the role of political competition in the evolution of government size over long horizons. Public Choice, 137, 369-401.
19. Fock, A., & Wong, C. P. W. (2008). Financing rural development for a harmonious society in China (Policy Research Working Paper No. wps 4693). Washington, DC, The World Bank.
20. Gelb, A., Knight, J. B., & Sabot, R. H. (1991). Public sector employment, rent seeking and economic growth. The Economic Journal, 101, 1186-1199.
21. Grossman, P. J. (1989). Fiscal decentralization and government size: An extension. Public Choice, 62(1), 63-69.
22. Halicioglu, F. (2003). Testing Wagner's law for Turkey, 1960-2000. Review of Middle East Economics and Finance, 1(2), 129-140.
23. Hood, C. (1995). The "new public management" in the 1980s: Variations on a theme. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20(2/3), 93-109.
24. Hsiao, C. (2002). Analysis of panel data (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
25. Hsiao, C., & Tahmiscioglu, A. K. (2008). Estimation of dynamic panel data models with both individual and time specific effects. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 138(9), 2698-2721.
26. Iyare, S. O., & Lorde, T. (2004). Co-integration, causality and Wagner's law: tests for selected Caribbean countries. Applied Economics Letters, 11, 815-825.
27. Ji, X., Liang, X., & Wang, R. (2004). The assessment of county-level fiscal performances and the policy recommendations. Fujian Tribune (Humanities & Social Sciences Monthly, Fujian luntan), 4, 109-112.
28. Jin, J., & Zou, H. (2002). How does fiscal decentralization affect aggregate, national, and subnational government size? Journal of Urban Economics, 52(2), 270-293.
29. Kimakova, A. (2009). Government size and openness revisited: The case of financial globalization. Kyklos, 62(3), 394-406.
30. Lalvani, M. (2002). Can decentralization limit government growth? A test of the Leviathan hypothesis for the Indian Federation. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 32(3), 25-45.
31. Lin, S., & Song, S. (2002). Urban economic growth in China: Theory and evidence. Urban Studies, 39(12), 2251-2266.
32. Liu, M., & Tao, R. (2007). Local governance, policy mandates and fiscal reform in China. In V. Shue & C. Wong (Eds.), Paying for progress in China: public finance, human welfare and changing patterns of inequality (pp. 166-189). London: Routledge.
33. Malesky, E. J. (2004). Push, pull, and reinforcing: The channels of FDI influence on provincial governance in Vietnam. In B. J. Kerkvliet & D. G. Marr (Eds.), Beyond Hanoi: Local government in Vietnam (pp. 285-333). Copenhagen: Nias.
34. Marlow, M. L. (1988). Fiscal decentralization and government size. Public Choice, 56(3), 259-269.
35. Martin, J. P. (1982). Public sector employment trends in Western industrialized economies. In R. H. Haveman (Ed.), Public finance and public employment. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.
36. Martinez-Vazquez, J., & Yao, M. (2009). Fiscal decentralization and public sector employment: A cross-country analysis. Public Finance Review, 37(5), 539-571.
37. Ministry of Finance (1999-2007). Finance yearbook of China. Beijing: China Public Finance Economics Press.
38. Ministry of Finance (1999-2009). Local fiscal statistical materials. Beijing: China Public Finance Economics Press.
39. Mueller, D. C. (2003). Public choice III. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40. National Bureau of Statistics (1999-2008). China statistical yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press.
41. Ngok, K., & Zhu, G. (2007). Marketization, globalization and administrative reform in China: A zigzag road to a promising future. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 73(2), 217-233.
42. Ni, H., & An, X. (2008). Government size and administrative cost: a perspective of fiscal management. Chinese Public Administration, 1, 17-20.
43. Oates, W. E. (1985). Searching for Leviathan: An empirical study. American Economic Review, 75(4), 748-757.
44. Ram, R. (1987). Wagner's hypothesis in time-series and cross-section perspectives: Evidence from "real" data for 115 countries. Review of Economics and Statistics, 69(2), 194-204.
45. Ram, R. (2009). Openness, country size, and government size: Additional evidence from a large cross-country panel. Journal of Public Economics, 93(1-2), 213-218.
46. Research Institute for Fiscal Science of the Ministry of Finance (2002). Analysis on pay arrears at the county and township level. Chinese Fiscal Research (Caizheng Yanjiu), 4, 36-41.
47. Rodden, J. (2002). The dilemma of fiscal federalism: Grants and fiscal performance around the world. American Journal of Political Science, 46(3), 670-687.
48. Rodrik, D. (1998). Why do more open economies have bigger governments? Journal of Political Economy, 106(5), 997-1032.
49. Sinha, D. (2007). Does the Wagner's law hold for Thailand? A time series study. http://mpra. ub. uni-muenchen. de/2560/1/MPRA_paper_2560. pdf. Accessed 1 July 2009.
50. Stein, E. (1998). Fiscal decentralization and government size in Latin America. In K. Fukasaku & R. Hausmann (Eds.), Democracy, decentralization and deficits in Latin America. Paris: IDB-OECD.
51. Tobin, D. (2005). Economic liberalization, the changing role of the state and "Wagner's law": China's development experience since 1978. World Development, 33(5), 729-743.
52. Wagner, A. (1893). Grundlegung der Politischen Oekonomie. Leipzig: C. F. Wintersche.
53. Wang, S. 2002. The political logic of the fiscal transfer system in China. Strategy and Management (zhanlve yu guanli), 3, 47-54.
54. Yang, D. L. (2004). Remaking the Chinese Leviathan: Market transition and the politics of governance in China. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
55. Zhang, G. (2007). The determinants of the Chinese public administrative cost. Journal of Tianjin Administration Institute (Tianjin xingzheng xueyuan xuebao), 9(2), 16-20.
56. Zhang, G. (2008a). The determinants of provincial variants of civil service size. Journal of Public Administration (gonggong xingzheng pinglun), 1, 89-111.
57. Zhang, G. (2008b). Fiscal size, establishment reform and civil service size: An empirical study based on the panel data for the period 1978-2006. CASS Journal of Political Science (zhengzhixue yanjiu), 4, 97-107.
58. Zhong, Y. (2003). Local government and politics in China: Challenges from below. Armonk: M. E. Sharpe.
59. Zhu, Z., & Krug, B. (2005). Is China a Leviathan? http://papers. ssrn. com/sol3/papers. cfm?abstract_id=636813. Accessed 8 May 2009.
60. Ziramba, E. (2008). Wagner's law: An econometric test for South Africa, 1960-2006. South African Journal of Economics, 76(4), 596-606.