Are pro-environmental consumption choices utility-maximizing? Evidence from subjective well-being data

Ecological Economics

Volumn 72, Issue , 2011, Pages 75-87

  Welsch, Heinz ^a   Kühling, Jan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OLDENBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Consumer choice; Life satisfaction; Pro environmental consumption; Utility maximization; Well being

Indexed keywords

CONSUMPTION BEHAVIOR; DATA SET; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; TRADE-ENVIRONMENT RELATIONS; UTILITY SECTOR;

EID: 82755192983     PISSN: 09218009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.04.015     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Ai C., Norton E.C. Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Economics Letters 2003, 80:123-129.
2. Andreoni J. Impure altruism and donations to public goods: a theory of warm-glow giving. Economic Journal 1990, 100:464-477.
3. Brambor T., Clark W.R., Golder M. Understanding interaction models: improving empirical analysis. Political Analysis 2006, 14:63-82.
4. Brekke K.A., Howarth R.B. Status, Growth and the Environment: Goods as Symbols in Applied Welfare Economics 2002, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
5. Economics and Happiness: Framing the Analysis 2007, Oxford University Press, Oxford. L. Bruni, P. Porta (Eds.).
6. Carroll C.D. Solving consumption models with multiplicative habits. Economics Letters 2000, 68:67-77.
7. Clark A.E., Frijters P., Shields M.A. Relative income, happiness and utility: an explanation for the Easterlin paradox and other puzzles. Journal of Economic Literature 2008, 46:95-144.
8. Clausen J. Feldvermessungsstudie Energie 2008, Borderstep Institute, Hanover, Germany.
9. Di Tella R., MacCulloch R. Some uses of happiness data in economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives 2006, 20:25-46.
10. Ferreira S., Moro M. On the use of subjective well-being data for environmental valuation. Environmental and Resource Economics 2010, 46(3):249-273.
11. Ferrer-i-Carbonell A., Frijters P. How important is methodology for the estimates of the determinants of happiness?. Economic Journal 2004, 114:641-659.
12. Frederick S., Loewenstein G. Hedonic adaptation. Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonics Psychology, Chapter 16 1999, Russell Sage Foundation, New York. D. Kahneman, E. Diener, N. Schwarz (Eds.).
13. Frey B.S., Stutzer A. What can economists learn from happiness research?. Journal of Economic Literature 2002, 40:402-435.
14. Frey B.S., Stutzer A. Economic Consequences of Mispredicting Utility, Working Paper No. 218 2004, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics, University of Zurich.
15. Howarth R.B. Status effects and environmental externalities. Ecological Economics 1996, 16:25-34.
16. Kahneman D., Wakker P.P., Sarin R. Back to Bentham? Explorations of experienced utility. Quarterly Journal of Economics 1997, 112:375-405.
17. Laaksonen P. Consumer Involvement: Concepts and Research 1994, Routledge, London.
18. Layard R. Happiness: Lessons from a New Science 2005, Penguin, New York.
19. Layard R. Happiness and public policy: a challenge to the profession. Economic Journal 2006, 116:C24-C33.
20. Loewenstein G., Adler D. A bias in the prediction of tastes. Economic Journal 1995, 105:929-937.
21. Loewenstein G., Schkade D.A. Wouldn't it be nice? Predicting future feelings. Well Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology 1999, Russell Sage Foundation, New York. D. Kahneman, E. Diener, N. Schwarz (Eds.).
22. Loewenstein G., O'Donoghue T., Rabin M. Projection bias in predicting future utility. Quarterly Journal of Economics 2003, 118:1209-1248.
23. Ono T. Is habitual consumption harmful to the environment?. Economics Bulletin 2002, 17:1-10.
24. Scitovsky The Joyless Economy: An Inquiry into Human Satisfaction and Consumer Dissatisfaction 1976, Oxford University Press, New York.
25. Shogren J.F., Taylor L.O. On behavioral-environmental economics. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 2008, 2:26-44.
26. Stutzer A., Frey B.S. Stress that doesn't pay: the commuting paradox. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 2010, 110:339-366.
27. Sydsaeter K., Hammond P. Mathematics for Economic Analysis 1995, Prentice Hall.
28. Welsch H., Kühling J. Determinants of pro-environmental consumption: the role of reference groups and routine behavior. Ecological Economics 2009, 69:166-176.
29. Welsch H., Kühling J. Using happiness data for environmental valuation: issues and applications. Journal of Economic Surveys 2009, 23:385-406.
30. Welsch H., Kühling J. Pro-environmental behavior and rational consumer choice: evidence from surveys of life satisfaction. Journal of Economic Psychology 2010, 31:405-420.
31. Wendner R. Do habits raise consumption growth?. Research in Economics 2003, 57:151-163.
32. Wendner R. Frames of reference, the environment and efficient taxation. Economics of Governance 2005, 6:13-31.
33. Wier M., Jensen K.O., Andersen L.M., Millock K. The character of demand in mature organic food markets: Great Britain and Denmark Compared. Food Policy 2008, 33:406-421.
34. Wilson T.D., Gilbert D.T. Affective forecasting. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 2003, Vol. 35:345-411. Elsevier, New York.