A First Evaluation of the Instructional Value of Negotiable Problem Solving Goals on the Exploratory Learning Continuum

Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications

Volumn 125, Issue , 2005, Pages 563-570

  Rosé, Carolyn ^a   Aleven, Vincent ^a   Carey, Regan ^a   Robinson, Allen ^a  

^a Carnegie Mellon University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SPEECH PROCESSING; STUDENTS;

DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS; DIALOGUE SYSTEMS; EXPLORATORY LEARNING; LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS; PROBLEM-SOLVING;

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION;

EID: 82755188475     PISSN: 09226389     EISSN: 18798314     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Aleven V., Koedinger, K. R., & Popescu, O. (2003). A Tutorial Dialogue System to Support Self-Explanation: Evaluation and Open Questions. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, AI-ED 2003.
2. Charney, D.H., & Reder, L.M. (1986). Designing tutorials for computer users: Effects of the form and spacing of practice on skill learning. Human Computer Interaction, 2, 297-317.
3. Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256-273.
4. Forbus, K. D. (1999). CyclePad: An Articulate Virtual Laboratory for Engineering Thermodynamics. Artificial Intelligence 114(1-2): 297-347.
5. Graesser, A. C., Bowers, C. A., Hacker, D.J., & Person, N. K. (1998). An anatomy of naturalistic tutoring. In K. Hogan & M. Pressley (Eds.), Scaffolding of instruction. Brookline Books.
6. Graesser, A., VanLehn, K., the TRG, & the NLT. (2002). Why2 Report: Evaluation of Why/Atlas, Why/AutoTutor, and Accomplished Human Tutors on Learning Gains for Qualitative Physics Problems and Explanations, LRDC Tech Report, (2002) University of Pittsburgh.
7. Graesser, A. C., Jackson, G. T., Mathews, E. C., Mitchell, H. H., Olney, A., Ventura, M., Chipman, P., Franceschetti, D., Hu, X., Louwerse, M. M., Person, N. K., and the Tutoring Research Group, (2003). Why/AutoTutor: A Test of Learning Gains from a Physics Tutor with Natural Language Dialog. Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society.
8. Klahr & Nigam (2004). The equivalence of learning paths in early science instruction: effects of direct instruction and discovery learning, Psychological Science, 2004.
9. Leutner, D. (1993). Guided discovery learning with computer-based simulation games: effects of adaptive and non-adaptive instructional support. Learning and Instruction, 3, 113-132.
10. Mayer, R. E. (2004). Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The Case for Guided Methods of Instruction, American Psychologist 59(1), pp 14-19.
11. McNeil, N. M., & Alibali, M. W. (2000). Learning mathematics from procedural instruction: Externally imposed goals influence what is learned. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 734-744.
12. Person, N., Bautista, L., Graesser, A., Mathews, E., & The Tutoring Research Group (2001). In J. D. Moore, C. L. Redfield, & W. L. Johnson (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence in Education: AI-ED in the Wired and Wireless Future, Proceedings of AI-ED 2001 (pp. 286-293). Amsterdam, IOS Press.
13. Rosé, C. P., Jordan, P., Ringenberg, M., Siler, S., VanLehn, K., & Weinstein, A. (2001). Interactive Conceptual Tutoring in Atlas-Andes, In J. D. Moore, C. L. Redfield, & W. L. Johnson (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence in Education: AI-ED in the Wired and Wireless Future, Proceedings of AI-ED 2001 (pp. 256-266). Amsterdam, IOS Press.
14. Rosé, C. P., Torrey, C., Aleven, V., Robinson, A., Wu, C. & Forbus, K. (2004). CycleTalk: Towards a Dialogue Agent that Guides Design with an Articulate Simulator, Proceedings of the Intelligent Tutoring Systems Conference.
15. Shute, Valerie J. and Glaser, Robert, (1990). "A Large Scale Evaluation Of An Intelligent Discovery World: Smithtown", Interactive Learning Environments 1, 51-77.
16. Tuovinen, J. E., & Sweller, J. (1999). A comparison of cognitive load associated with discovery learning and worked examples. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 334-341.