PSL-based online monitoring of digital systems

Applications of Specification and Design Languages for SoCs: Selected papers from FDL 2005

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 5-22

  Borrione, Dominique ^a   Liu, Miao ^a   Ostier, Pierre ^a   Fesquet, Laurent ^a  

^a TIMA LABORATORY   (France)

Author keywords

monitor; property; PSL

Indexed keywords

EID: 82755166753     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-4998-9_1     Document Type: Chapter

References (15)

1. Abardanel, Y., Beer, I., Gluhovsky, L., Keidar, S., and Wolfsthal, Y. (2000) FoCs: automatic generation of simulation checkers from formal specifications. In: Emerson, E. A. and Sistla, A. P. (eds) Computer Aided Verification 12th International Conference, CAV 2000, vol. 1855 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, Chicago, IL ISBN: 3-540-67770-4, also available from http://www.haifa.il. ibm.com/projects/verification/RB-Homepage/ps/checkers. ps.
2. Accellera (2003) Property Specification Language Reference Manual. Accellera, version 1.01 edition.
3. Accellera (2004) Property Specification Language Reference Manual. Accellera, version 1.1 edition.
4. Beer, I., Ben-David, S., Eisner, C., and Landver, A. (1996) RuleBase: an industry-oriented formal verification tool. In: Proceedings of the 33st Conference on Design Automation. ASM Press, Las Vegas, NV, pp. 655-660.
5. Claessen, K. and Martensson, J. (2004) An operational semantics for weak PSL. In: Hu, A. J. and Martin, A. K. (eds) Formal Methods in Computer-Aided Design: 5th International Conference, FMCAD 2004, vol. 3312 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer Austin, TX, pp. 337-351.
6. Cohen, B., Venkataramanan, S., and Kumari, A. (2004) Using PSL/Sugar for Formal and Dynamic Verification. Los Angeles, CA. VhdlCohen Publishing, 2nd edn.
7. Daniele, M., Giunchiglia, F., and Vardi, M. (1999) Improved automata generation for linear temporal logic. In: Halbwachs, N. and Peled, D. (eds). Computer Aided Verification: 11th International Conference, CAV'99, vol. 1633 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, Trento, Italy, pp. 249-260. ISBN: 3-540-66202-2.
8. Formal Methods Group (2000) Guide to Sugar formal specification language. Technical Report Version 1.3.1, IBM Haifa Research Laboratory, http://www.haifa.il.ibm.com/projects/verification/sugar/literature.html.
9. Foster, H., Krolnik, A., and Lacey, D. (2003) Assertion-Based Design. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
10. Gascard, E. (2005) From sequential extended regular expressions to deterministic finite automata. In: Proceedings of the ITI 3rd International Conference on Information & Communications Technology (ICICT 2005). IEEE, Cairo, Egypt.
11. Gastin, P. and Oddoux, D. (2001) Fast LTL to büchi automata translation. In: Berry, G., Comon, H., and Finkel, A. (eds) Computer Aided Verification: 13th International Conference, CAV 2001, vol. 2102 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, Paris, France, pp. 53-65.
12. Gordon, M., Hurd, J., and Slind, K. (2003) Executing the formal semantics of the accellera property specification language by mechanised theorem proving. In: Geist, D. and Tronci, E. (eds) Correct Hardware Design and Verification Methods: 12th IFIP WG 10.5 Advanced Research Working Conference, CHARME 2003, vol. 2860 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, L'Aquila, Italy, pp. 200-215.
13. IBM (2005) Sugar-Based tools. IBM Haifa Research Laboratory, http://www.haifa.il.ibm.com/projects/verification/sugar/tools. html.
14. Liu, M. (2004) Generation of a verification environment for the standard property specification language. Unpublished research report, TIMA, Grenoble, France.
15. Sebastiani, R and Tonetta, S. (2003) More deterministic vs. smaller büchi automata for efficient LTL model checking. In: Geist, D. and Tronci, E. (eds) Correct Hardware Design and Verification Methods: 12th IFIP WG 10.5 Advanced Research Working Conference, CHARME 2003, vol. 2860 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, L'Aquila, Italy, pp. 126-140.