A comparison of scope for growth (SFG) and dynamic energy budget (DEB) models applied to the blue mussel (Mytilus edulis)

Journal of Sea Research

Volumn 66, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 403-410

  Filgueira, Ramón ^a,b   Rosland, Rune ^c   Grant, Jon ^b  

^a INSTITUTO DE INVESTIGACIONES MARINAS   (Spain)

^b DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

Author keywords

DEB; Modeling; Mussel growth; Mytilus edulis; SFG

Indexed keywords

BIVALVE; CALIBRATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DATA SET; ECOLOGICAL THEORY; ECOSYSTEM RESPONSE; ENERGY BUDGET; ENVIRONMENTAL GRADIENT; FOOD AVAILABILITY; FOOD INTAKE; FUNCTIONAL RESPONSE; GROWTH MODELING; MARINE ENVIRONMENT; METABOLISM; MODEL TEST; OPTIMIZATION; PARAMETERIZATION; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; TROPHIC CONDITIONS;

BIVALVIA; MYTILUS EDULIS;

EID: 82655166705     PISSN: 13851101     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.seares.2011.04.006     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Bacher C., Gangnery A. Use of dynamic energy budget and individual based models to simulate the dynamics of cultivated oyster populations. J. Sea Res. 2006, 56:140-155.
2. Bayne B.L., Iglesias J.I.P., Hawkins A.J.S., Navarro E., Héral M., Deslous-Paoli J.M. Feeding behaviour of the mussel, Mytilus edulis: responses to variations in quantity and organic content of the seston. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K. 1993, 73:813-829.
3. Bourlès Y., Alunno-Bruscia M., Pouvreau S., Tollu G., Leguay D., Arnaud C., Goulletquer P., Kooijman S.A.L.M. Modelling growth and reproduction of the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas: advances in the oyster-DEB model through application to a coastal pond. J. Sea Res. 2009, 62:62-71.
4. Brigolin D., Dal Maschio G., Rampazzo F., Giani M., Pastres R. An individual-based population dynamic model for estimating biomass yield and nutrient fluxes through an off-shore mussel (Mytilus galloprovincialis) farm. Estuar. Coast. Shelf S. 2009, 82:365-376.
5. Davenport J., Smith R., Packer M. Mussels Mytilus edulis: significant consumers and destroyers of mesozooplankton. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2000, 198:131-137.
6. Duarte P., Fernández-Reiriz M.J., Filgueira R., Labarta U. Modelling mussel growth in ecosystems with low suspended matter loads. J. Sea Res. 2010, 64:273-286.
7. Ferreira J.G., Hawkins A.J.S., Monteiro P., Moore H., Service M., Pascoe P.L., Ramos L., Sequeira A. Integrated assessement of ecosystem-scale carrying capacity in shellfish growing areas. Aquaculture 2008, 275:138-151.
8. Filgueira R., Grant J. A box model for ecosyste-level management of mussel culture carrying capacity in a coastal bay. Ecosystems 2009, 12:1222-1233.
9. Gallegos C.L. Microzooplankton grazing on phytoplankton in the Rhode River, Maryland: nonlinear feeding kinetics. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 1989, 57:23-33.
10. Gangnery A., Chabirand J.M., Lagarde F., Le Gall P., Oheix J., Bacher C., Buestel D. Growth model of the Pacific oyster, Crassostrea gigas, cultured in Thau Lagoon (Méditerranée, France). Aquaculture 2003, 215:267-290.
11. Garen P., Robert S., Bougrier S. Comparison of growth of mussels, Mytilus edulis, on longline, pole and bottom culture sites in the Pertuis Breton, France. Aquaculture 2004, 232:511-524.
12. Grangeré K., Ménesguen A., Lefebvre S., Bacher C., Pouvreau S. Modelling the influence of environmental factors on the physiological status of the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas in an estuarine embayment; The Baie des Veys (France). J. Sea Res. 2009, 62:147-158.
13. Grant J., Bacher C. Comparative models of mussel bioenergetics and their validation at field culture sites. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 1998, 219:21-44.
14. Grant J., Dowd M., Thompson K., Emerson C., Hatcher A. Perspectives on field studies and related biological models of bivalve growth. Bivalve Filter Feeders and Marine Ecosystem Processes 1993, 371-420. Springer-Verlag, New York. R. Dame (Ed.).
15. Grant J., Curran K.J., Guyondet T.L., Tita G., Bacher C., Koutitonsky V., Dowd M. A box model of carrying capacity for suspended mussel aquaculture in Lagune de la Grande-Entrée, Iles-de-la-Madeleine. Québec. Ecol. Model. 2007, 200:193-206.
16. Hawkins A.J.S., Duarte P., Fang J.G., Pascoe P.L., Zhang J.H., Zhang X.L., Zhu M.Y. A functional model of responsive suspension-feeding and growth in bivalve shellfish, configured and validated for the scallop Chlamys farreri during culture in China. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2002, 281:13-40.
17. Jones C.G., Lawton J.H., Shachak M. Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos 1994, 69:373-386.
18. Kooijman S.A.L.M. Energy budgets can explain body size relations. J. Theor. Biol. 1986, 121:269-282.
19. Kooijman S.A.L.M. Dynamic Energy and Mass Budgets in Biological Systems 2000, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 419pp.
20. Kooijman S.A.L.M. Pseudo-faeces production in bivalves. J. Sea Res. 2006, 56:103-106.
21. Kremer J., Nixon S.W. A Coastal Marine Ecosystem: Simulation and Analysis 1978, Springer-Verlag, New York, 217 pp.
22. Maar M., Bolding K., Petersen J.K., Hansen J.L.S., Timmermann K. Local effects of blue mussels around turbine foundations in an ecosystem model of Nysted off-shore wind farm. Denmark. J. Sea Res. 2009, 62:159-174.
23. Nisbet R.M., Muller E.B., Lika K., Kooijman S.A.L.M. From molecules to ecosystems through dynamic energy budget models. J. Anim. Ecol. 2000, 69:913-926.
24. Officer C.B., Smayda T.J., Mann R. Benthic filter feeding: a natural eutrophication control. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 1982, 9:203-210.
25. Pastres R., Solidoro C., Cossarini G., Canu D.M., Dejak C. Managing the rearing of Tapes philippinarum in the lagoon of Venice: a decision support system. Ecol. Model. 2001, 138:231-245.
26. Pouvreau S., Bourlès Y., Lefebvre S., Gangnery A., Alunno-Bruscia M. Application of a dynamic energy budget to the Pacific oyster, Crassostrea gigas, under various environmental conditions. J. Sea Res. 2006, 56:156-167.
27. Ren J.S. Effect of food quality on energy uptake. J. Sea Res. 2009, 62:72-74.
28. Ren J.S., Schiel D.R. A dynamic energy budget model: parameterisation and application to the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas in New Zealand waters. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2008, 361:42-48.
29. Ren J.S., Ross A.H., Hadfields M.G., Hayden B.J. An ecosystem model for estimating potential shellfish culture production in sheltered coastal waters. Ecol. Model. 2010, 221:527-539.
30. Rosland R., Strand Ø., Alunno-Bruscia M., Bacher C., Strohmeier T. Applying Dynamic Energy Budget (DEB) theory to simulate growth and bio-energetics of blue mussels under low seston conditions. J. Sea Res. 2009, 62:49-61.
31. Strohmeier T., Strand Ø., Cranford P. Clearance rates of the great scallop (Pecten maximus) and blue mussel (Mytilus edulis) at low seston concentrations. Mar. Biol. 2009, 156:1781-1795.
32. Trottet A., Roy S., Tamigneaux E., Lovejoy C., Tremblay R. Impact of suspended mussels (Mytilus edulis L.) on plankton communities in a Magdalen Islands lagoon (Quebec, Canada): a mesocosm approach. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2008, 365:103-115.
33. van der Meer J. An introduction to Dynamic Energy Budget (DEB) models with special emphasis on parameter estimation. J. Sea Res. 2006, 56:85-102.
34. van der Veer H.W., Cardoso J.F.M.F., van der Meer J. The estimation of DEB parameters for various Northeast Atlantic bivalve species. J. Sea Res. 2006, 56:107-124.
35. Willows R.I. Optimal digestive investment: a model for filter feeders experiencing variable diets. Limnol. Oceanogr. 1992, 37:829-847.
36. Winberg G.G. Rate of metabolism and food requirements of fishes. Transl. Ser. Fish. Res. Board Can. 1960, 194:1-202.
37. Zar J.H. Biostatistical Analysis 1984, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.