Muted differences: Entrenching legitimacy of the Bosnian statehood?

Cooperation and Conflict

Volumn 46, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 460-481

  Berg, Eiki ^a   Solvak, Mihkel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TARTU   (Estonia)

Author keywords

Bosnia and Herzegovina; legitimacy; partition; power sharing; Republika Srpska

Indexed keywords

EID: 82555194485     PISSN: 00108367     EISSN: 14603691     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0010836711422465     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Beetham DDefining and Measuring Democracy. London: Sage; 1994:.
2. Beetham D,Lord CLegitimacy and the EU. London: Longman; 1998:.
3. Belloni R.Bosnia: Dayton is dead! Long live Dayton!.Nationalism and Ethnic Politics. 2009;15:355-75.
4. Berg E,Ben-Porat G.Introduction: Power-sharing vs. partition. Themed section on partition/conflict resolution.Nations and Nationalism. 2008;14 (1): 29-37.
5. Bieber F.After Dayton, Dayton? The evolution of an unpopular peace.Ethnopolitics. 2006a;5 (1): 15-31.
6. Bieber F.Bosnia-Herzegovina: Slow progress towards a functional state.Southeast European & Black Sea Studies. 2006b;6 (1): 43-64.
7. Bieber F (2006c) Bosnia-Herzegovina: Ethnicity, inequality and public sector governance. In: Bangura Y (ed.) Ethnic Inequalities and Public Sector Governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
8. Bose SBosnia after Dayton: Nationalist Partition and International Intervention. London: Hurst & Co; 2002:.
9. Bose S.The Bosnian State a decade after Dayton.International Peacekeeping. 2005;12 (3): 322-35.
10. Buchanan A (1998) Democracy and secession. In: Moore M (ed.) National Self-Determination and Secession. New York: Oxford University Press.
11. Buchanan A.Political legitimacy and democracy.Ethics. 2002;11 (2): 689-719.
12. Buzan B,Waever O,de Wilde JSecurity: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner; 1998:.
13. Caspersen N.Good fences make good neighbours? A comparison of conflict-regulation strategies in postwar Bosnia.Journal of Peace Research. 2004;41 (5): 569-88.
14. Chandler D.The limits of peacebuilding: International regulation and civil society development in Bosnia.International Peacekeeping. 1999;6 (1): 109-25.
15. Chandler D.Introduction: Peace without politics.International Peacekeeping. 2005;12 (3): 307-21.
16. Coicaud J-MLegitimacy and Politics: A Contribution to the Study of Political Right and Political Responsibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002:.
17. Cox M (2001) State-Building and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Lessons from Bosnia. Centre for Applied Studies in International Negotiations (CASIN). Geneva.
18. DervisbegovicN (2006) Serbs do not see their future in Bosnia (12September). Available at: http://www.daytonproject.org/about/article.php?id=162 (accessed 16 January).
19. European Values Study (2008) Study No. 4800. Available at: http://www.europeanvaluesstudy.eu/evs/surveys/survey-2008.html (accessed 17 June 2011).
20. Fuchs D, Guidorossi G and Svensson P. (1995) Support for the democratic system. In: Klingemann H-D and Fuchs D (eds) Citizens and the State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21. Håkansson P,Sjöholm F.Who do you trust? Ethnicity and trust in Bosnia and Herzegovina.Europe-Asia Studies. 2007;59 (6): 961-76.
22. Hansen A.Political legitimacy, confidence-building and the Dayton Peace Agreement.International Peacekeeping. 1997;4 (2): 74-90.
23. Haupt C (2006) Dayton-Bosnia and Herzegovina at a Crossroads. Paper presented at the 12th Workshop of the PfP Consortium Study Group Regional Stability in South East Europe on 'International Peace Plans for the Balkans-A Success?' organized by the Austrian Ministry of Defence at the Chateau Rothschild in Reichenau, Austria, 5-8 May.
24. Hayden R (1998) Bosnia: The contradictions of 'democracy' without consent. East European Constitutional Review, Spring, pp. 47-51.
25. Hayden R.'Democracy' without a demos? The Bosnian constitutional experiment and the intentional construction of nonfunctioning states.East European Politics and Societies. 2005;19 (2): 226-59.
26. Kaufmann C.Possible and impossible solutions to ethnic civil wars.International Security. 1996;20:136-75.
27. Kostovicova D.Republika Srpska and its boundaries in Bosnian Serb geographical narratives in the post-Dayton period.Space & Polity. 2004;8 (6): 267-87.
28. Lipset MS.Some social requisites of democracy, economic development and political legitimacy.American Political Science Review. 1959;59:69-105.
29. Lipset MS.A comparative analysis of the social requisites of democracy.International Social Science Journal. 1993;135 (2): 155-75.
30. MarkoJ (2005) Post-conflict reconstruction through state- and nation-building: The case of Bosnia and Herzegovina. European Diversity and Autonomy Papers EDAP 4/2005. Available at: www.eurac.edu/edap (accessed 16 January 2011).
31. Marko J (2006) Constitutional reform in Bosnia and Herzegovina 2005-06. European Yearbook of Minority Issues 5. Brill.
32. Mearshimer J,Van Evara S.When peace means war.The New Republic. 1995;:.
33. Norris P (1999) Introduction: The growth of critical citizens. In: Norris P (ed.) Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34. Obradovic D.Policy legitimacy and the European Union.Journal of Common Market Studies. 1996;34 (2): 191-221.
35. O'Loughlin J,Tuathail GÓ.Accounting for separatist sentiment in Bosnia-Herzegovina and the North Caucasus of Russia: A comparative analysis of survey responses.Ethnic and Racial Studies. 2009;32 (4): 591-615.
36. Ó Tuathail G,O'Loughlin J,Djipa D.Bosnia-Herzegovina ten years after Dayton: Constitutional change and public opinion.Eurasian Geography and Economics. 2006;47 (1): 61-75.
37. Rothstein B.Creating political legitimacy: Electoral democracy versus quality of government.American Behavioral Sciences. 2009;53 (3): 311-30.
38. Schnekener U.Making power-sharing work: Lessons from successes and failures in ethnic conflict regulation.Journal of Peace Research. 2002;39 (2): 203-28.
39. SimonJ (1996) Popular Conceptions of Democracy in Post-Communist Europe. University of Strathclyde Studies in Public Policy, No. 273.
40. Sisk TPower Sharing and International Mediation in Ethnic Conflicts. Washington D.C.: USIP; 1996:.
41. Sisk T (2003) Power-sharing after civil wars: Matching problems to solutions. In: Darby J and MacGinty R (eds) Contemporary Peacemaking: Conflict, Violence and Peace Processes. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
42. Stroschein S.Examining ethnic violence and partition in Bosnia-Herzegovina.Ethnopolitics. 2005;4 (1): 49-64.
43. The Economist. Balkan Scheming:; 2009:.
44. The Financial Times, Ethnic tensions stretch Bosnia's power grid to breaking point (by Neil MacDonald), 4November2009.
45. The Silent Majority Speaks, Oxford Research International2007. Available at: www.undp.ba (accessed 16 January 2011).
46. Tir J.Dividing countries to promote peace: Prospects for long-term success of partitions.Journal of Peace Research. 2005;42 (5): 545-62.
47. TraynorI (2006) Serb move may trigger new war. The Guardian, 6September. Available at: http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,1865633,00.html#article_continue (accessed 16 January 2011).
48. UNDP, Early Warning System Annual Reports2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009. Available at: http://www.undp.ba/ (accessed 16 January 2011).
49. UNDP, Early Warning System Research 2000-2006. Special edition. Available at: http://www.undp.ba/upload/publications/5%20Years%20EWS%20Research-web%20edition.pdf (accessed 17 June 2011).
50. Weber MEconomy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 1978:.
51. Whitt S.Institutions and ethnic trust: Evidence from Bosnia.Europe-Asia Studies. 2010;62 (2): 271-92.
52. World Values Survey (1998, 2001). Available at: http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/ (accessed 17 June 2011).