Rating: How difficult is it?

RecSys'11 - Proceedings of the 5th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 149-156

  Sparling, E Isaac ^a   Sen, Shilad ^b  

^a Socialcast   (United States)

^b MACALESTER COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

rating scales; recommender systems; user studies

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE LOADS; FACEBOOK; ONLINE SURVEYS; PRODUCT REVIEWS; RATING SCALE; USER STUDY;

RECOMMENDER SYSTEMS; STARS; SURVEYS;

RATING;

EID: 82555183094     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2043932.2043961     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. G. Adomavicius and A. Tuzhilin. Toward the next generation of recommender systems: A survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions. IEEE transactions on knowledge and data engineering, pages 734-749, 2005. (Pubitemid 40860454)
2. G. Al Mamunur Rashid and J. Riedl. Learning preferences of new users in recommender systems: an information theoretic approach. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, 10(2), 2008.
3. A. Bader-Natal. Incorporating game mechanics into a network of online study groups. In AIED 2009: 14 th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education Workshops Proceedings, page 109. Citeseer, 2009.
4. C. Boutilier, R. Zemel, and B. Marlin. Active collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the Nineteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pages 98-106. Citeseer, 2003.
5. R. Brunken, J. L. Plass, and D. Leutner. Direct measurement of cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1):53-61, 2003. (Pubitemid 36400004)
6. D. Cosley, S. K. Lam, I. Albert, J. A. Konstan, and J. Riedl. Is seeing believing?: how recommender system interfaces affect users' opinions. In Proceedings of SIGCHI, pages 585-592. ACM New York, NY, USA, 2003.
7. J. Gwizdka. Distribution of cognitive load in web search. Arxiv preprint arXiv:1005.1340, 2010.
8. F. M. Harper, X. Li, Y. Chen, and J. A. Konstan. An economic model of user rating in an online recommender system. In User Modeling 2005, pages 307-316. 2005.
9. J. L. Herlocker, J. A. Konstan, A. Borchers, and J. Riedl. An algorithmic framework for performing collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of SIGIR, page 237. ACM, 1999.
10. G. A. C. Jr and J. P. Peter. Research design effects on the reliability of rating scales: a meta-analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, XXI(1):360-375, November 1984.
11. J. Liu, Y. Cao, C. Y. Lin, Y. Huang, and M. Zhou. Low-quality product review detection in opinion summarization. In Proceedings of EMNLP-CoNLL, page 334-342, 2007.
12. F. Paas, J. E. Tuovinen, H. Tabbers, and P. W. M. V. Gerven. Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive load theory. Educational psychologist, 38(1):63-71, 2003. (Pubitemid 36400005)
13. J. Patrick, R. Pruchno, and M. Rose. Recruiting research participants: a comparison of the costs and effectiveness of five recruitment strategies. The Gerontologist, 38(3):295, 1998.
14. C. C. Preston and A. M. Colman. Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences. Acta Psychologica, 104(1):1-15, 2000.
15. A. Rashid, I. Albert, D. Cosley, S. Lam, S. McNee, J. Konstan, and J. Riedl. Getting to know you: learning new user preferences in recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces, pages 127-134. ACM, 2002.