GGP (Global Geodynamics Project): An International Network of Superconducting Gravimeters to Study Time-Variable Gravity

International Association of Geodesy Symposia

Volumn 135, Issue , 2010, Pages 627-635

  Crossley, D ^a   Hinderer, J ^b  

^a Saint Louis University School of Science and Engineering   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE STRASBOURG EOST   (France)

Author keywords

GGP; GRACE; Gravimetry; IRIS; Superconducting gravimeter

Indexed keywords

CONTINENTAL HYDROLOGIES; GGP; GLOBAL GEODYNAMICS PROJECTS; GRACE; INTERNATIONAL NETWORKS; IRIS; SUPERCONDUCTING GRAVIMETER; TIME-VARIABLE GRAVITY;

GEODETIC SATELLITES; GRAVIMETERS; GRAVIMETRIC ANALYSIS; HYDROLOGY; OBSERVATORIES; SEISMOLOGY; TECTONICS; TIME VARYING NETWORKS;

GEODYNAMICS;

EID: 82555171251     PISSN: 09399585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-10634-7_83     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Amalvict, M. and J. Hinderer (2007). Is the calibration factor stable in time? Proceedings of the First Asian Workshop on SGs, Taiwan, http://space.cv.nctu.edu.tw/SG/Amalvict_CalibrationSG.pdf.
2. Crossley, D. (2004). Preface to the global geodynamics project. J. Geodyn., 38, 225-236.
3. Crossley D., C. de Linage, J. Hinderer, and J.-P. Boy (2007). GRACE Solutions for the gravity field over Central Europe compared to the surface field as recorded by the GGP network. Eos Trans. AGU, 88(52), Fall Meet. Suppl., Abstract U21C-0625.
4. Crossley, D. and J. Hinderer (2008). The contribution of GGP superconducting gravimeters to GGOS. In: Sideris M.G. (ed.), Observing our changing Earth, IAG Symposia, Vol. 133, pp. 841-852, Springer Verlag, Berlin.
5. Crossley D., J. Hinderer, G. Casula, O. Francis, H.-T. Hsu, Y. Imanishi, G. Jentsch, J. Kaarianen, J. Merriam, B. Meurers, J. Neumeyer, B. Richter, K. Shibuya, T. Sato, and T. van Dam (1999). Network of superconducting gravimeters benefits a number of disciplines. EOS, Trans. Am. Geophys. U., 80, 121-126.
6. Crossley, D., H. Xu, and T. Van Dam (1998). Comprehensive analysis of 2 years of data from Table Mountain, Colorado. Proceedings of the 13th Int. Symp. Earth Tides, Ducarme, B., and Paquet, P. (eds), pp. 659-668. Royal Observatory of Brussels.
7. Harnisch G., M. Harnisch, and R. Falk (2006). Hydrological influences on the gravity variations recorded at Bad Homburg. Bull. d'Inf. Marees Terr., 142, 11331-11342.
8. Hinderer, J., D. Crossley, and R. Warburton (2007). Superconducting gravimetry. In: Herring, T. and G. Schubert (eds.), Treatise on geophysics, Vol 3, Elsevier.
9. Imanishi, Y., T. Sato, T. Higashi, W. Sun, and S. Okubo (2004). A network of superconducting gravimeters detects submicrogal coseismic gravity changes. Science, 306, 476-478.
10. Kroner, C., O. Dierks, J. Neumeyer, and H. Wilmes (2005). Analysis of observations with dual sensor superconducting gravimeters. Phys. Earth Planet. Int., 153(4), 210-219.
11. Kroner, C. and T. Jahr (2006). Hydrological experiments around the superconducting gravimeter at Moxa Observatory. J. Geodyn., 41, 268-275.
12. Lambert, A., Courtier, N., and T. S. James (2006). Long-term monitoring by absolute gravimetry: tides to postglacial rebound. J. Geodynamics, 41, 307-317.
13. Larson, K. and T. van Dam (2000). Measuring postglacial rebound with GPS and absolute gravity. GRL, 27, 3925-3928.
14. Longuevergne, L., G. Ferhat, P. Ulrich, J.-P. Boy, N. Florsch, and J. Hinderer (2007). Towards physical modeling of local-scale hydrological contribution of soils for precise gravimetric corrections in Strasbourg. Proceedings of the First Asian Workshop on SGs, http://space.cv.nctu.edu.tw/SG/longuevergne_taiwan_2007.pdf, Taiwan.
15. Naujoks, M., C. Kroner, T. Jahr, P. Krause, and A. Weise (2007). Gravimetric 3D modeling and observation of time-dependent gravity variations to improve small-scale hydro-logical modeling, poster, session HW2004, IUGG XXIV General Assembly, Perugia, Italy.
16. Plag, H.-P. (2008). The Global Geodetic Observing System (GGOS): A Key Component in the Global Earth Observation System of Systems, IAG Symposium Gravity, Geoid, and Earth Obseration, Chania, Crete, 23-27 June.
17. Plag, H.-P., C. Kreemer, and W. Hammond (2007). Combination of GPS-observed vertical motion with absolute gravity changes constrain the tie between reference frame origin and Earth center of mass, in: Report of the Seventh SNARF Workshop, held in Monterrey, California, 28 March, 2007.
18. Richter, B. (1987). Das supraleitende Gravimeter, Deutsche Geodät. Komm., Reihe C, 329, Frankfurt am Main, p. 124.
19. Rosat, S., W. Sun, and T. Sato (2007). Geographical variations of the 0S0 normal mode amplitude: predictions and observations after the Sumatra-Andaman earthquake. Earth Planet. Space, 59, 307-311.
20. Wenzel, H.-G. (1996). The nanogal software: Earth tide processing package ETERNA 3.30. Bull. Inf. Mar. Terr., 124, 9425-9439.
21. Wziontek, H., R. Falk, H. Wilmes, and P. Wolf (2006). Rigorous combination of superconducting and absolute gravity measurements with respect to instrumental properties. Bull. d'Inf. Marees Terr., 142, 11417-11422.
22. Xu, Y., D. Crossley, and R. Herrmann (2008). Amplitude and Q of 0S0 from the Sumatra earthquake as recorded on superconducting gravimeters and seismometers. Seis. Res. Lett., 79(6), 797-805.
23. Zerbini, S., B. Richter, F. Rocca, T. van Dam, and F. Matonti (2007). A combination of space and terrestrial geodetic techniques to monitor land subsidence: case study, the southeastern Po Plain, Italy. J. Geophys. Res., 112, B05401, doi: 10.1029/2006JB004338.