The Limits of Protest Event Data and Repertoires for the Analysis of Contemporary Feminism

Politics and Gender

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 616-622

  Bagguley, Paul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 82455250823     PISSN: 1743923X     EISSN: 17439248     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1743923X10000401     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. Andrew Merrindahl. 2009. “Looking Back at Thinking Ahead: Feminist Institution-Building in Australia.” Presented at the International Political Science Association Congress, Santiago, Chile.
2. Bagguley Paul. 2002. “Contemporary British Feminism: A Social Movement in Abeyance?” Social Movement Studies 1: 169–85.
3. Costain Anne N. 1992. Inviting Women's Rebellion: A Political Process Interpretation of the Women's Movement. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
4. Danzger M. Herbert. 1975. “Validating Conflict Data.” American Sociological Review, 40: 570–84.
5. Earl Jennifer, Andrew Martin, McCarthy John D., and Soule Sarah A. 2004. “The Use of Newspaper Data in the Study of Collective Action.” Annual Sociological Review 30: 65–80.
6. Grey Sandra. 2009. “Arguing as ‘Special Interests’: Fraught Interactions Between New Zealand Social Movements and the New Public Sector.” Presented at the International Political Science Association Congress, Santiago, Chile.
7. Katzenstein Mary Fainsod. 1990. “Feminism within American Institutions: Unobtrusive Mobilization in the 1980 s.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 16: 27–54.
8. Koopmans Ruud, and Statham Paul. 1999. “Political Claims Analysis: Integrating Protest Event and Political Discourse Approaches.” Mobilization 4: 203–21.
9. Lester M. 1980. “Generating Newsworthiness: The Interpretive Construction of Public Events.” American Sociological Review 45: 984–94.
10. McCarthy John D., McPhail Clark, and Smith Jackie. 1996. “Images of Protest: Dimensions of Selection Bias in Media Coverage of Washington Demonstrations, 1982 and 1991.” American Sociological Review 61: 478–99.
11. Oliver Pamela A., and Maney Gregory M. 2000. “Political Processes and Local Newspaper Coverage of Protest Events: From Selection Bias to Triadic Interactions.” American Journal of Sociology 106: 463–505.
12. Olzack Susan. 1989. “Analysis of Events in the Study of Collective Action.” Annual Review of Sociology 15: 119–41.
13. Ortiz D., Myers Daniel J., Wall N. Eugene, and Diaz Maria-Elena D. 2005. “Where Do We Stand with Newspaper Data?” Mobilization 10 (3): 397–419.
14. Rucht Dieter, 2003. “Interactions between Social Movements and States in Comparative Perspective.” In Women's Movements Facing the Reconfigured State, ed. Banaszak Lee Ann, Beckwith Karen, and Rucht Dieter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Sawer Marian, and Grey Sandra. 2008. “Introduction.” In Women's Movements: Flourishing or in Abeyance? ed. Grey Sandra and Sawer Marian. London: Routledge.
16. Soule Sarah, McAdam Doug, McCarthy John D., and Su Yang. 1999. “Protest Events: Cause or Consequence of State Action? The U.S. Women's Movement and Federal Congressional Activities, 1956–1979.” Mobilization 4: 239–56.
17. Taylor Verta, and Van Dyke Nella. 2004. “‘Get Up, Stand Up’: Tactical Repertoires of Social Movements.” In The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, ed. Snow David A., Soule Sara A., and Kriesi Hanspeter. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
18. Tilly Charles. 1995. “Contentious Repertoires in Great Britain, 1758–1834.” In Repertoires and Cycles of Collective Action, ed. Mark Traugott. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
19. Tilly Charles. 2004. Social Movements: 1768–2004. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.