Landmark identification errors on cone-beam computed tomography-derived cephalograms and conventional digital cephalograms

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 140, Issue 6, 2011, Pages

  Chang, Zwei Chieng ^a,b   Hu, Fu Chang ^b   Lai, Eddie ^a,b   Yao, Chung Chen ^a,b   Chen, Mu Hsiung ^b   Chen, Yi Jane ^a,b  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANATOMIC LANDMARK; ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MULTILEVEL ANALYSIS; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; STATISTICAL MODEL; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANATOMIC LANDMARKS; CEPHALOMETRY; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ERRORS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MULTILEVEL ANALYSIS; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 82455217210     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.06.024     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Y.J. Chen, S.K. Chen, J.C. Yao, and H.F. Chang The effects of differences in landmark identification on the cephalometric measurements in traditional versus digitized cephalometry Angle Orthod 74 2004 155 161
2. M.W. Vannier Craniofacial computed tomography scanning: technology, applications and future trends Orthod Craniofac Res 6 Suppl 1 2003 23 30
3. K. Maki, N. Inou, A. Takanishi, and A.J. Miller Computer-assisted simulations in orthodontic diagnosis and the application of a new cone beam x-ray computed tomography Orthod Craniofac Res 6 Suppl 1 2003 95 101
4. G.R. Swennen, and F. Schutyser Three-dimensional cephalometry: spiral multi-slice vs cone-beam computed tomography Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 130 2006 410 416
5. D.J. Halazonetis From 2-dimensional cephalograms to 3-dimensional computed tomography scans Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 127 2005 627 637
6. O.J. van Vlijmen, T. Maal, S.J. Berge, E.M. Bronkhorst, C. Katsaros, and A.M. Kuijpers-Jagtman A comparison between 2D and 3D cephalometry on CBCT scans of human skulls Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 39 2010 156 160
7. M.A. Silva, U. Wolf, F. Heinicke, A. Bumann, H. Visser, and E. Hirsch Cone-beam computed tomography for routine orthodontic treatment planning: a radiation dose evaluation Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 133 2008 640 645
8. L. Lou, M.O. Lagravre, S. Compton, P.W. Major, and C. Flores-Mir Accuracy of measurements and reliability of landmark identification with computed tomography (CT) techniques in the maxillofacial area: a systematic review Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 104 2007 402 411
9. J.B. Ludlow, M. Gubler, L. Cevidanes, and A. Mol Precision of cephalometric landmark identification: cone-beam computed tomography vs conventional cephalometric views Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 136 2009 312.e1-10
10. V. Kumar, J.B. Ludlow, A. Mol, and L. Cevidanes Comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms Dentomaxillofac Radiol 36 2007 263 269
11. V. Kumar, J. Ludlow, L.H. Soares Cevidanes, and A. Mol In vivo comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms Angle Orthod 78 2008 873 879
12. D. Grauer, L.S. Cevidanes, M.A. Styner, I. Heulfe, E.T. Harmon, and H. Zhu Accuracy and landmark error calculation using cone-beam computed tomography-generated cephalograms Angle Orthod 80 2010 286 294
13. K.Y. Liang, and S.L. Zeger Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models Biometrika 73 1986 13 22
14. S.L. Zeger, and K.Y. Liang Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes Biometrics 42 1986 121 130
15. P.M. Cattaneo, C.B. Bloch, D. Calmar, M. Hjortshoj, and B. Melsen Comparison between conventional and cone-beam computed tomography-generated cephalograms Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 134 2008 798 802
16. M. Lamichane, N.K. Anderson, P.H. Rigali, E.B. Seldin, and L.A. Will Accuracy of reconstructed images from cone-beam computed tomography scans Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 136 2009 156.e1-6
17. O.J. van Vlijmen, S.J. Berge, G.R. Swennen, E.M. Bronkhorst, C. Katsaros, and A.M. Kuijpers-Jagtman Comparison of cephalometric radiographs obtained from cone-beam computed tomography scans and conventional radiographs J Oral Maxillofac Surg 67 2009 92 97
18. M. Moshiri, W.C. Scarfe, M.L. Hilgers, J.P. Scheetz, A.M. Silveira, and A.G. Farman Accuracy of linear measurements from imaging plate and lateral cephalometric images derived from cone-beam computed tomography Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 132 2007 550 560
19. Y.J. Chen, S.K. Chen, H.W. Huang, C.C. Yao, and H.F. Chang Reliability of landmark identification in cephalometric radiography acquired by a storage phosphor imaging system Dentomaxillofac Radiol 33 2004 301 306
20. L. Ritter, R.A. Mischkowski, J. Neugebauer, T. Dreiseidler, M. Scheer, and E. Keeve The influence of body mass index, age, implants, and dental restorations on image quality of cone beam computed tomography Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 108 2009 e108-16