How to date pregnancy?;Comment déterminer la date de début de grossesse?

Journal de Gynecologie Obstetrique et Biologie de la Reproduction

Volumn 40, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 726-733

  Salomon, L J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

Author keywords

Consensus; CRL; LMP; Pregnancy; Term; Ultrasound

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONCEPTION; MATERNAL WELFARE; MEASUREMENT; PREGNANCY;

CHRONOLOGY AS TOPIC; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; GROWTH CHARTS; HUMANS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY TESTS; PREGNANCY, MULTIPLE; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, PRENATAL;

EID: 82455210926     PISSN: 03682315     EISSN: 17730430     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2011.09.016     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. A. Ferreira-Poblete The probability of conception on different days of the cycle with respect to ovulation: an overview Adv Contracept 2-3 1997 83 95 (Pubitemid 27384573)
2. A.J. Wilcox, C.R. Weinberg, and D.D. Baird Timing of sexual intercourse in relation to ovulation. Effects on the probability of conception, survival of the pregnancy, and sex of the baby N Engl J Med 333 1995 1517 1521
3. L.J. Salomon, J.P. Bernard, M. Duyme, I. Buvat, and Y. Ville The impact of choice of reference charts and equations on the assessment of fetal biometry Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 25 2005 559 565 (Pubitemid 40835459)
4. T.H. Nguyen, T. Larsen, G. Engholm, and H. Møller Evaluation of ultrasound-estimated date of delivery in 17,450 spontaneous singleton births: do we need to modify Naegele's rule? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 14 1999 23 28 (Pubitemid 29410490)
5. H.K. Gjessing, P. Grottum, and S.H. Eik-Nes A direct method for ultrasound prediction of day of delivery: a new, population-based approach Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 30 2007 19 27 (Pubitemid 47074847)
6. L.J. Salomon, C. Pizzi, A. Gasparrini, J.P. Bernard, and Y. Ville Prediction of the date of delivery based on first trimester ultrasound measurements: An independent method from estimated date of conception J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 23 2010 1 9
7. D.A. Savitz, J.W. Terry, N. Dole, J.M. Thorp, A.M. Siega-Riz, and A.H. Herring Comparison of pregnancy dating by last menstrual period, ultrasound scanning, and their combination Am J Obstet Gynecol 187 2002 1660 1666 (Pubitemid 36026704)
8. A. Boyce, M.J. Mayaux, and D. Schwartz Classical and true gestational postmaturity Am J Obstet Gynecol 125 1976 911 914
9. M. Saito, K. Yazawa, A. Hashiguchi, T. Kumasaka, N. Nishi, and K. Kato Time of ovulation and prolonged pregnancy Am J Obstet Gynecol 112 1972 31 38
10. A.J. Wilcox, D. Dunson, and D.D. Baird The timing of the fertile window in the menstrual cycle: day-specific estimates from a prospective study BMJ 321 2000 1259 1262
11. B. Scarpa, and D.B. Dunson Bayesian selection of predictors of conception probabilities across the menstrual cycle Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 1 2006 30 37 (Pubitemid 44610893)
12. C.D. Lynch, L.W. Jackson, and G.M. Buck Louis Estimation of the day-specific probabilities of conception: current state of the knowledge and the relevance for epidemiological research Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 1 2006 3 12 (Pubitemid 44610890)
13. Y. Liu, E.B. Gold, B.L. Lasley, and W.O. Johnson Factors affecting menstrual cycle characteristics Am J Epidemiol 160 2004 131 140 (Pubitemid 38962999)
14. M.J. Keulers, C.J.C.M. Hamilton, A. Franx, J.L.H. Evers, and R.S.G.M. Bots The length of the fertile window is associated with the chance of spontaneously conceiving an ongoing pregnancy in subfertile couples Hum Reprod 22 2007 1652 1656 (Pubitemid 47055155)
15. R. Ecochard, H. Boehringer, M. Rabilloud, and H. Marret Chronological aspects of ultrasonic, hormonal, and other indirect indices of ovulation BJOG 108 2001 822 829 (Pubitemid 32695315)
16. D.B. Dunson, C.R. Weinberg, D.D. Baird, J.S. Kesner, and A.J. Wilcox Assessing human fertility using several markers of ovulation Stat Med 20 2001 965 978 (Pubitemid 32249093)
17. D.B. Dunson, D.D. Baird, A.J. Wilcox, and C.R. Weinberg Day-specific probabilities of clinical pregnancy based on two studies with imperfect measures of ovulation Hum Reprod 14 1999 1835 1839 (Pubitemid 29358709)
18. J.G. Westergaard, B. Teisner, J.G. Grudzinskas, and T. Chard Single measurements of chorionic gonadotropin and schwangerschafts protein for assessing gestational age and predicting the day of delivery J Reprod Med 30 1985 57 60 (Pubitemid 15161551)
19. P.N. Lohstroh, J.W. Overstreet, D.R. Stewart, S.T. Nakajima, J.R. Cragun, and S.P. Boyers Secretion and excretion of human chorionic gonadotropin during early pregnancy Fertil Steril 83 2005 1000 1011
20. Cole LA. Individual deviations in human chorionic gonadotropin concentrations during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol [Internet] 2011 [cité 2011 mars 26]; Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ 21324434.
21. D.G. Altman, and L.S. Chitty New charts for ultrasound dating of pregnancy Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 10 1997 174 191 (Pubitemid 27472452)
22. C.S. Hoffman, L.C. Messer, P. Mendola, D.A. Savitz, A.H. Herring, and K.E. Hartmann Comparison of gestational age at birth based on last menstrual period and ultrasound during the first trimester Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 22 2008 587 596
23. S. Saltvedt, H. Almstrom, M. Kublickas, M. Reilly, L. Valentin, and C. Grunewald Ultrasound dating at 12-14 or 15-20 weeks of gestation? A prospective cross-validation of established dating formulae in a population of in-vitro fertilized pregnancies randomized to early or late dating scan Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 24 2004 42 50 (Pubitemid 38932246)
24. A. Skalkidou, H. Kieler, O. Stephansson, N. Roos, S. Cnattingius, and B. Haglund Ultrasound pregnancy dating leads to biased perinatal morbidity and neonatal mortality among post-term-born Girls Epidemiology 21 2010 791 796
25. J.S. Bagratee, L. Regan, V. Khullar, C. Connolly, and J. Moodley Reference intervals of gestational sac, yolk sac and embryo volumes using three-dimensional ultrasound Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 34 2009 503 509
26. G. Grisolia, K. Milano, G. Pilu, C. Banzi, C. David, and S. Gabrielli Biometry of early pregnancy with transvaginal sonography Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 3 1993 403 411
27. A.B. Caughey, J.M. Nicholson, and A.E. Washington First- vs second-trimester ultrasound: the effect on pregnancy dating and perinatal outcomes Am J Obstet Gynecol 198 2008 [703.e1-5-703.e5-6]
28. H.P. Robinson, and J.E. Fleming A critical evaluation of sonar crown-rump length measurements Br J Obstet Gynaecol 82 1975 702 710
29. J. Gardosi, T. Vanner, and A. Francis Gestational age and induction of labour for prolonged pregnancy Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104 1997 792 797 (Pubitemid 27319455)
30. B. Blondel, I. Morin, R.W. Platt, M.S. Kramer, R. Usher, and G. Bréart Algorithms for combining menstrual and ultrasound estimates of gestational age: consequences for rates of preterm and postterm birth BJOG 109 2002 718 720 (Pubitemid 37329287)
31. R. Bukowski, G. Saade, F.D. Malone, G. Hankins, and M.E. D'Alton A decrease in postdate pregnancies is an additional benefit of first trimester screening for aneuploidy Am J Obstet Gynecol 185 2001 S148
32. Haute Autorité de santé. Déclenchement artificiel du travail partir de 37 semaines d'aménorrhée 2008
33. J. Gardosi Dating of pregnancy: time to forget the last menstrual period Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 9 1997 367 368
34. J. Gardosi, and R.T. Geirsson Routine ultrasound is the method of choice for dating pregnancy Br J Obstet Gynaecol 105 1998 933 936 (Pubitemid 28442316)
35. M. Mongelli, M. Wilcox, and J. Gardosi Estimating the date of confinement: ultrasonographic biometry versus certain menstrual dates Am J Obstet Gynecol 174 1996 278 281 (Pubitemid 26037724)
36. G.E. Chalouhi, J.P. Bernard, G. Benoist, B. Nasr, Y. Ville, and L.J. Salomon A comparison of first trimester measurements for prediction of delivery date J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 24 2011 51 57
37. L.J. Salomon, M. Bernard, R. Amarsy, J.P. Bernard, and Y. Ville The impact of crown-rump length measurement error on combined Down syndrome screening: a simulation study Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 33 2009 506 511
38. P. Taipale, and V. Hiilesmaa Predicting delivery date by ultrasound and last menstrual period in early gestation Obstet Gynecol 97 2001 189 194 (Pubitemid 32126331)
39. G.E. Chalouhi, J.P. Bernard, G. Benoist, B. Nasr, Y. Ville, and L.J. Salomon A comparison of first trimester measurements for prediction of delivery date J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 24 2011 51 57 [Epub 2010 Mar 30]
40. S. Campbell, S.L. Warsof, D. Little, and D.J. Cooper Routine ultrasound screening for the prediction of gestational age Obstet Gynecol 65 1985 613 620 (Pubitemid 15123925)
41. L.J. Salomon, J.P. Bernard, M. Duyme, A. Dorion, and Y. Ville Revisiting first-trimester fetal biometry Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 22 2003 63 66 (Pubitemid 36886452)
42. www.sfape.com. 2011.
43. M. D'Alton, and J. Cleary-Goldman First and second trimester evaluation of risk for fetal aneuploidy: the secondary outcomes of the FASTER Trial Semin Perinatol 29 2005 240 246 (Pubitemid 41133564)
44. P. Taipale, M. Ammälä, R. Salonen, and V. Hiilesmaa Learning curve in ultrasonographic screening for selected fetal structural anomalies in early pregnancy Obstet Gynecol 101 2003 273 278 (Pubitemid 36170128)
45. D.S. Sahota, T.Y. Leung, T.N. Leung, O.K. Chan, and T.K. Lau Fetal crown-rump length and estimation of gestational age in an ethnic Chinese population Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 33 2009 157 160
46. C. Bottomley, A. Daemen, F. Mukri, A.T. Papageorghiou, E. Kirk, and A. Pexsters Assessing first trimester growth: The influence of ethnic background and maternal age Hum Reprod 24 2009 284 290
47. R. Hackmon, K.B. Le Scale, J. Horani, A. Ferber, and M.Y. Divon Is severe macrosomia manifested at 11-14 weeks of gestation? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 32 2008 740 743
48. T.Y. Leung, D.S. Sahota, L.W. Chan, L.W. Law, T.Y. Fung, and T.N. Leung Prediction of birth weight by fetal crown-rump length and maternal serum levels of pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A in the first trimester Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 31 2008 10 14 (Pubitemid 351211924)
49. R.L. Deter, J.E. Buster, P.R. Casson, and S.A. Carson Individual growth patterns in the first trimester: evidence for difference in embryonic and fetal growth rates Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 13 1999 90 98 (Pubitemid 29106250)
50. M. Thorsell, M. Kaijser, H. Almstrom, and E. Andolf Expected day of delivery from ultrasound dating versus last menstrual period-obstetric outcome when dates mismatch BJOG 115 2008 585 589 (Pubitemid 351357588)
51. G.C.S. Smith First-trimester determination of complications of late pregnancy JAMA 303 2010 561 562
52. G.C. Smith, M.F. Smith, M.B. McNay, and J.E. Fleming First-trimester growth and the risk of low birth weight N Engl J Med 339 1998 1817 1822 (Pubitemid 29005786)
53. G.C. Smith First trimester origins of fetal growth impairment Semin Perinatol 28 2004 41 50 (Pubitemid 38298828)
54. N.G. Pedersen, F. Figueras, K.R. Wøjdemann, A. Tabor, and J. Gardosi Early fetal size and growth as predictors of adverse outcome Obstet Gynecol 112 2008 765 771
55. D.O. Mook-Kanamori, E.A.P. Steegers, P.H. Eilers, H. Raat, A. Hofman, and V.W.V. Jaddoe Risk factors and outcomes associated with first-trimester fetal growth restriction JAMA 303 2010 527 534
56. P. Leelapatana, W.J. Garrett, and P.S. Warren Early growth retardation in the first trimester: is it characteristic of the chromosomally abnormal fetus? Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 32 1992 95 97
57. A. Drugan, M.P. Johnson, N.B. Isada, W. Holzgreve, I.E. Zador, and M.P. Dombrowski The smaller than expected first-trimester foetus is at increased risk for chromosome anomalies Am J Obstet Gynecol 167 1992 1525 1528 (Pubitemid 23009281)
58. R. Bukowski, G.C.S. Smith, F.D. Malone, R.H. Ball, D.A. Nyberg, and C.H. Comstock Fetal growth in early pregnancy and risk of delivering low birth weight infant: prospective cohort study BMJ 334 2007 836
59. L.J. Salomon Early fetal growth: concepts and pitfalls Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 35 2010 385 389
60. L.J. Salomon, S. Hourrier, R. Fanchin, Y. Ville, and P. Rozenberg Is first-trimester crown-rump length associated with birthweight? BJOG 118 2011 1223 1228
61. K. Tunón, S.H. Eik-Nes, and P. Grøttum Fetal outcome in pregnancies defined as post-term according to the last menstrual period estimate, but not according to the ultrasound estimate Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 14 1999 12 16 (Pubitemid 29410488)
62. A. Saari-Kemppainen, O. Karjalainen, P. Ylostalo, and O.P. Heinonen Ultrasound screening and perinatal mortality: controlled trial of systematic one-stage screening in pregnancy. The Helsinki ultrasound trial Lancet 336 1990 387 391 (Pubitemid 20252435)
63. U. Waldenström, O. Axelsson, S. Nilsson, G. Eklund, O. Fall, and S. Lindeberg Effects of routine one-stage ultrasound screening in pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial Lancet 2 1988 585 588
64. B.G. Ewigman, J.P. Crane, F.D. Frigoletto, M.L. LeFevre, R.P. Bain, and D. McNellis Effect of prenatal ultrasound screening on perinatal outcome. RADIUS Study Group N Engl J Med 329 1993 821 827 (Pubitemid 23267208)
65. M.S. Kramer, F.H. McLean, M.E. Boyd, and R.H. Usher The validity of gestational age estimation by menstrual dating in term, preterm, and postterm gestations JAMA 260 1988 3306 3308
66. K.A. Bennett, J.M.G. Crane, P. O'shea, J. Lacelle, D. Hutchens, and J.A. Copel First trimester ultrasound screening is effective in reducing postterm labor induction rates: a randomized controlled trial Am J Obstet Gynecol 190 2004 1077 1081 (Pubitemid 38561528)
67. S. Saltvedt, H. Almström, M. Kublickas, M. Reilly, L. Valentin, and C. Grunewald Ultrasound dating at 12-14 or 15-20 weeks of gestation? A prospective cross-validation of established dating formulae in a population of in-vitro fertilized pregnancies randomized to early or late dating scan Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 24 2004 42 50 (Pubitemid 38932246)
68. W.J. Ott Accurate gestational dating: revisited Am J Perinatol 11 1994 404 408 (Pubitemid 24375033)
69. C.B. Benson, and P.M. Doubilet Sonographic prediction of gestational age: accuracy of second- and third-trimester fetal measurements AJR Am J Roentgenol 157 1991 1275 1277
70. F.P. Hadlock, R.L. Deter, R.B. Harrist, and S.K. Park Estimating fetal age: computer-assisted analysis of multiple fetal growth parameters Radiology 152 1984 497 501 (Pubitemid 14093784)
71. F.A. Chervenak, D.W. Skupski, R. Romero, M.K. Myers, M. Smith-Levitin, and Z. Rosenwaks How accurate is fetal biometry in the assessment of fetal age? Am J Obstet Gynecol 178 1998 678 687 (Pubitemid 28196873)
72. F.P. Hadlock, R.L. Deter, R.B. Harrist, and S.K. Park Computer assisted analysis of fetal age in the third trimester using multiple fetal growth parameters J Clin Ultrasound 11 1983 313 316 (Pubitemid 13037403)
73. M.R. Chavez, C.V. Ananth, J.C. Smulian, S. Lashley, E.V. Kontopoulos, and A.M. Vintzileos Fetal transcerebellar diameter nomogram in singleton gestations with special emphasis in the third trimester: a comparison with previously published nomograms Am J Obstet Gynecol 189 2003 1021 1025 (Pubitemid 37373891)
74. A.S. Vinkesteijn, P.G. Mulder, and J.W. Wladimiroff Fetal transverse cerebellar diameter measurements in normal and reduced fetal growth Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 15 2000 47 51 (Pubitemid 33108667)
75. th week of gestation from fetal kidney length measurements Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 19 2002 592 597 (Pubitemid 34626125)
76. A.G. Gottlieb, and H.L. Galan Nontraditional sonographic pearls in estimating gestational age Semin Perinatol 32 2008 154 160 (Pubitemid 351636321)
77. E. Quarello, J. Stirnemann, Y. Ville, and L. Guibaud Assessment of fetal Sylvian fissure operculization between 22 and 32 weeks: a subjective approach Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 32 2008 44 49
78. B.R. Cohn, E.Y. Fukuchi, B.N. Joe, M.G. Swanson, J. Kurhanewicz, and J. Yu Calculation of gestational age in late second and third trimesters by ex-vivo magnetic resonance spectroscopy of amniotic fluid Am J Obstet Gynecol 203 2010 76.e1 76.e10
79. D.G. Altman, and L.S. Chitty Charts of fetal size: 1. Methodology Br J Obstet Gynaecol 101 1994 29 34 (Pubitemid 24204771)
80. T. Dias, S. Mahsud-Dornan, B. Thilaganathan, A. Papageorghiou, and A. Bhide First-trimester ultrasound dating of twin pregnancy: are singleton charts reliable? BJOG 117 2010 979 984
81. J. Gardosi, T. Mul, A. Francis, J. Hall, and S. Fishel Comparison of second trimester biometry in singleton and twin pregnancies conceived with assisted reproductive techniques Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104 1997 737 740 (Pubitemid 27278361)
82. L.J. Salomon, and Y. Ville First-trimester crown-rump-length (CRL) discrepancy: much ado about nothing? Am J Obstet Gynecol 193 2005 592 593 [author reply 593-594]
83. L.J. Salomon, O. Cavicchioni, J.P. Bernard, M. Duyme, and Y. Ville Growth discrepancy in twins in the first trimester of pregnancy Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 26 2005 512 516 (Pubitemid 41634537)
84. Comité national technique de l'échographie de dépistage prénatal. Report from the national technic commitee for prenatal ultrasound screening. 2005.
85. P. Crowley Interventions for preventing or improving the outcome of delivery at or beyond term Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000 CD000170
86. P. Sladkevicius, S. Saltvedt, H. Almström, M. Kublickas, C. Grunewald, and L. Valentin Ultrasound dating at 12-14 weeks of gestation. A prospective cross-validation of established dating formulae in in-vitro fertilized pregnancies Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 26 2005 504 511 (Pubitemid 41634536)