Large-eddy simulations of convection-driven dynamos using a dynamic scale-similarity model (Geophysical and Astrophysical Fluid Dynamics, 106, 3, 250-276, 10.1080/03091929.2011.590806);Large-eddy simulations of convection-driven dynamos using a dynamic scale-similarity model

Geophysical and Astrophysical Fluid Dynamics

Volumn 106, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 250-276

  Matsui, Hiroaki ^a   Buffett, Bruce A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Large eddy simulation; Magnetohydrodynamics; Numerical dynamo; Sub grid scale model

Indexed keywords

ERROR CORRECTION; HEAT FLUX; INTERACTIVE DEVICES; MAGNETOHYDRODYNAMICS;

CONVECTION DRIVEN DYNAMOS; DIMENSIONLESS NUMBER; FILTERING OPERATIONS; MAGNETIC PRANDTL NUMBERS; NUMERICAL DYNAMOS; SPATIAL DIFFERENTIATION; SUB-GRID-SCALE MODELS; TIME-DEPENDENT COEFFICIENTS;

LARGE EDDY SIMULATION;

ERROR ANALYSIS; GEODYNAMO; HEAT FLUX; LARGE EDDY SIMULATION; MAGNETIC FIELD; MAGNETOHYDRODYNAMICS; MANTLE CONVECTION; MODELING; SPATIAL RESOLUTION;

EID: 82455209158     PISSN: 03091929     EISSN: 10290419     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03091929.2012.702998     Document Type: Erratum

References (23)

1. Braginsky, SI and Meytlis, VP. 1990. Local turbulence in the Earth's core. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dynam., 55: 71-87.
2. Buffett, BA. 2003. A comparison of subgrid-scale models for large-eddy simulations of convection in the Earth's core. Geophys. J. Int., 153: 753-765.
3. Chen, Q and Jones, CA. 2008. Similarity and dynamic similarity models for large-eddy simulations of a rotating convection-driven dynamo. Geophys. J. Int., 172: 103-114.
4. Christensen, UR, Olson, P and Glatzmaier, GA. 1999. Numerical modelling of the geodynamo: a systematic parameter study. Geophys. J. Int., 138: 393-409.
5. Germano, M. 1986. A proposal for a redefinition of the turbulent stresses in the filtered Navier-Stokes equations. Phys. Fluids, 29: 2323-2324.
6. Germano, M, Piomelli, U, Moin, P and Cabot, WH. 1991. A dynamic subgrid-scale eddy viscosity model. Phys. Fluids A, 3: 1760-1765.
7. Ghosal, S and Moin, P. 1995. The basic equations for the large eddy simulation of turbulent flows in complex geometry. J. Comput. Phys., 118: 24-37.
8. Glatzmaier, GA and Roberts, PH. 1995. A three-dimensional self-consistent computer simulation of a geomagnetic field reversal. Nature, 377: 203-209.
9. Kuang, W and Bloxham, J. 1997. An Earth-like numerical dynamo model. Nature, 389: 371-374.
10. Kuang, W. and Bloxham, J., Numerical modeling of magnetohydrodynamic convection in a rapidly rotating spherical shell: weak and strong field dynamo action. J. Comput. Phys. 1999, 153, 51-81
11. Leonard, A. 1974. Energy cascade in large-eddy simulations of turbulent fluid flows. Adv. Geophys., 18: 237-248.
12. Matsui, H and Buffett, BA. 2005. Sub-grid scale model for convection-driven dynamos in a rotating plane layer. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 153: 108-123.
13. Matsui, H and Buffett, BA. 2007a. Commutation error correction for large eddy simulations of convection driven dynamos. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dynam., 101: 429-449.
14. Matsui, H and Buffett, BA. 2007b. A dynamic scale-similarity model for dynamo simulations in a rotating plane layer. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dynam., 101: 451-468.
15. Matsushima, M. 2001. Expression of turbulent heat flux in the Earth's core in terms of a second moment closure model. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 128: 137-148.
16. Matsushima, M, Nakajima, T and Roberts, PH. 1999. The anisotoropy of local turbulence in the Earth's core. Earth Planets Space, 51: 277-286.
17. Meneveau, C and Katz, J. 2000. Scale-invariance and turbulence models for large-eddy simulation. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 32: 1-32.
18. Phillips, CG and Ivers, DJ. 2001. Special interactions of rapidly-rotating anisotropic turbulent viscous and thermal diffusion in the Earth's core. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 128: 93-107.
19. Phillips, CG and Ivers, DJ. 2003. Strong field anisotropic diffusion models for the Earth's core. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 140: 13-28.
20. Piomelli, U. 1993. High Reynolds number calculations using the dynamic subgrid-scale stress model. Phys. Fluids A, 5: 1484-1490.
21. Sakuraba, A. and Kono, M., Effect of the inner core on the numerical solution of the magnetohydrodynamic dynamo. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 1999, 111, 105-121
22. Shimizu, H and Loper, DE. 1997. Time and length scales of buoyancy-driven flow structures in a rotating hydromagnetic fluid. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 104: 307-329.
23. Vasilyev, OV, Lund, TS and Moin, P. 1998. A general class of commutative filters for LES in complex geometries. J. Comput. Phys., 146: 82-104.