Tactile perception: Do distinct subpopulations explain differences in mislocalization rates of stimuli across fingertips?

Neuroscience Letters

Volumn 505, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 1-5

  Warren, Jay P ^a   Tillery, Stephen I Helms ^a,b  

^a Arizona State University   (United States)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Electrocutaneous; Electrotactile; Fingertips; Perceptual subpopulations; Touch

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FINGER; HUMAN; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TACTILE STIMULATION; TOUCH;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BIOPHYSICS; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; FINGERS; FOREARM; HUMANS; ILLUSIONS; PHYSICAL STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; SKIN; TOUCH; TOUCH PERCEPTION;

EID: 82455208984     PISSN: 03043940     EISSN: 18727972     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2011.04.057     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Danilov Y.P., Tyler M.E., Kaczmarek K.A. Electrotactile vision: achievements, problems, perspective. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2008, 69:162-163.
2. Flach R., Haggard P. The cutaneous rabbit revisited. J. Exp. Psychology - Human Percept. Perform. 2006, 32:717-732.
3. Geldard F.A. Cutaneous stimuli, vibratory and saltatory. J. Invest. Dermatol. 1977, 69:83-87.
4. Geldard F.A., Sherrick C.E. The cutaneous saltatory area and its presumed neural basis. Percept. Psychophys. 1983, 33:299-304.
5. Miyazaki M., Hirashima M., Nozaki D. The "cutaneous rabbit" hopping out of the body. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30:1856-1860.
6. Montgomery D.C. Design and Analysis of Experiments 2009, John Wiley and Sons Inc. 7th ed.
7. Warren J.P., Santello M., Helms Tillery S.I. Electrotactile stimuli delivered across fingertips inducing the cutaneous rabbit effect. Expt. Brain Res. 2010, 206(4):419-426.