The influence of working memory features on some formal aspects of translation performance

Benjamins Translation Library

Volumn 45, Issue , 2003, Pages 97-119

  Rothe Neves, Rui ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF MINAS GERAIS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 82455198492     PISSN: 09297316     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1075/btl.45.09rot     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (46)

1. Alves, F. (1995). Zwischen Schweigen und Sprechen: Wie bildet sich eine transkulturelle Brücke?; Eine psycholinguistisch orientierte Untersuchung von Übersetzungsvorgängen zwischen portugiesischen und brasilianischen Übersetzern. Hamburg: Dr. Kovac.
2. Alves, F. (1997). A formacąõ de tradutores a partir de uma abordagem cognitiva: Reflexões de um projeto de ensino. TradTerm, 4(2), 19-40.
3. Andrews, G. & Halford, G. S. (1994). Relational complexity and sentence processing. Proceedings of the 21st Annual Experimental Psychology Conference. Sydney: University of Sydney.
4. Baddeley, A. D. & Hitch, G. J. (1994). Developments in the concept of working memory. Neuropsychology, 8(4), 485-493.
5. Baddeley, A. D., Logie, R., Nimmo-Smith, I. & Brereton, N. (1985). Components of fluent reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 119-131.
6. Bausch, K.-R. (1977). Zur Übertragbarkeit der Übersetzung als Fertigkeit auf die Übersetzung als Übungsform. Die neueren Sprachen, 26, 517-535.
7. Carroll, J. (1964). Language and Thought. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
8. Case, R., Kurland, D. M. & Goldberg, J. (1982). Operational efficiency and the growth of short-term memory span. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 33, 386-404.
9. Daneman, M. (1991). Working memory as a predictor of verbal fluency. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 20(6), 445-464.
10. Daneman, M. & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450-466.
11. Daneman, M. & Green, I. (1986). Individual differences in comprehending and producing words in context. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 1-18.
12. Daneman, M. & Merikle, P. M. (1996). Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3(4), 422-433.
13. Danks, J. H., Shreve, G. M., Fountain, S. B., & McBeath, M. K. (Eds.). (1997). Cognitive processes in translation and interpreting. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
14. Darò, V. & Fabbro, F. (1994). Verbal memory during simultaneous interpretation: Effects of phonological interference. Applied Linguistics, 15, 365-381.
15. De Groot, A. M. B. (1997). The cognitive study of translation and interpretation. In J. H. Danks, G. M. Shreve, S. B. Fountain, & M. K. McBeath (Eds.), Cognitive processes in translation and interpretation (pp. 25-56). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
16. Dillinger, M. L. (1989). Component process of Simultaneous Interpreting. Montreal: McGill University (unpubl. Doctoral thesis).
17. Gerloff, P. (1987). Identifying the unit of analysis in translation: Some uses of think aloud protocol data. In C. Færch & G. Kasper (Ed.), Introspection in Second Language Research (pp. 135-158). Philadelphia:MultilingualMatters.
18. Gernsbacher, M. A. (Ed.). (1994).Handbook of Psycholinguistics. San Diego: Academic Press.
19. Gile, D. (1997). Conference interpreting as a cognitivemanagement problem. In J.H. Danks, G.M. Shreve, S. B. Fountain, &M. K.McBeath (Eds.), Cognitive Processes in Translation and Interpretation (pp. 196-214). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
20. Goldman-Rakic, P. (1996). Regional and cellular fractionation of working memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 93, 13473-13480.
21. Just, M. A. & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 91, 122-149.
22. Kowal, S. & O'Connell, D. C. (1987).Writing as language behavior:myths, models, methods. In A. Matsuhashi, (Ed.), Writing in Real Time: Modelling Production Processes (pp. 108-132). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
23. Laukkanen, J. (1996). Affective and attitudinal factors in translation processes. Target, 8(2): 257-274.
24. Levy, C. M. & Ransdell, S. (Eds.). (1996). The Science of Writing; theories, methods, individual differences, and applications. Hillsdale/New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25. Lezak, M. D. (1995). Neuropsychological assessment. 3rd ed. Oxford:OUP.
26. Masson, M. E. J. & Miller, J. A. (1983). Working memory and individual differences in comprehension and memory of text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(2), 314-318.
27. Mayr, U., Kliegl, R., & Krampe, R. T. (1996). Sequential and coordinative processing dynamics in figural transformations across the life span. Cognition, 59, 61-90.
28. Padilla, P., Bajo, M. T., Canãs, J. J., & Padilla, F. (1995). Cognitive processes of memory in simultaneous interpretation. In J. Tommola (Ed.), Topics in interpreting research (pp. 61-71). Turku: University of Turku/Centre for translation and interpreting.
29. Perini, M. A. (1998). Gramática Descritiva do Português. 3.ed. Saõ Paulo: Ática.
30. Ransdell, S. E. & Levy, M. C. (1996). Working memory constraints on writing quality and fluency. In Levy & Ransdell Eds. (pp. 93-101).
31. Ransdell, S. E., Arecco, M. R., & Levy, C. M. (2001). Bilingual long-term working memory loads on writing quality and fluency. Applied Psycholinguistics, 22, 113-128.
32. Ransdell, S. E. & Gilroy, L. (2001). The effects of background music on word processed writing. Computers in Human Behavior, 17, 141-148.
33. Rothe-Neves, R. (2001).Medidas em tempo real para pesquisas experimentais emtraducąõ: Explorando o programa Translog. In A. Pagano (Ed.), Metodologias de Pesquisa em Traducąõ (pp. 41-67). Belo Horizonte: Faculdade de Letras, UFMG.
34. Rothe-Neves, R. (2002). Características cognitivas e desempenho em traducąõ: Investigacąõ em tempo real. [Cognitive characteristics and performance in translation: An on-line investigation] Belo Horizonte: FALE/UFMG. (unpubl. PhD thesis).
35. Rothe-Neves, R. (in press). Translation Quality Assessment for Research Purposes: An Empirical Approach. Cadernos de Traducąõ, special issue on translation process analysis.
36. Rothe-Neves, R. (in prep.). How long should a writing pause be?.
37. Salthouse, T. A. & Babcock, R. L. (1991). Decomposing adult age differences in working memory. Developmental Psychology, 27(5), 763-776.
38. Schilperoord, J. (1996). It's about Time. Temporal Aspects of Cognitive Processes in Text Production. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
39. Séguinot, C. (1997). Accounting for variability in translation. In Danks et al. Eds. (pp. 104-119).
40. Shreve, G. M., Schäffner, C., Danks, J. H., & Griffin, J. (1993). Is there a special kind of reading for translation?: An empirical investigation of reading in the translation process. Target, 5(1), 21-41.
41. Singer, M. & Ritchot, K. F. M. (1996). The role of working memory capacity and knowledge access in text inference processing. Memory and Cognition, 24(6), 733-743.
42. Titone, R. (1971). Psicolinguistica Applicata. Roma: Armando Armando.
43. Tomitch, L. M. B. (2000). Individual differences in working memory capacity and the recall of predicted elements in the text. Lenguas Modernas, 26-27, 31-51.
44. Tommola, J. & Hyönä, J. (1996). The effect of training on cognitive load during simultaneous interpreting. Proceedings of the Federation of Interpreters and Translators, Vol. 2. Melbourne.
45. Westerman, S. J., Davies, D. R., Glendon, A. I., Stammers, R. B., & Matthews, G. (1998). Ageing andword processing competence: Compensation or compilation? British Journal of Psychology, 89, 579-597.
46. Wood, G. M. O., Carvalho, M. R. S., Rothe-Neves, R., & Haase, V. G. (2001). Validacąõ da Bateria de Avaliacąõ da Memória de Trabalho (BAMT-UFMG). Psicologia: Reflexaõ e Crítica, 14(2), 325-341.