Torn between admiration and distrust: European strategy research and the american challenge

Organization Science

Volumn 22, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1655-1662

  Lampel, Joseph ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Competition; Europe; Funding; Strategy research; United States

Indexed keywords

EID: 82455188616     PISSN: 10477039     EISSN: 15265455     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1100.0608     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Andrews, K. R. 1971. The Concept of Corporate Strategy. Dow Jones-Irwin, Homewood, IL.
2. Ansoff, H. I. 1965. Coporate Strategy. McGraw-Hill, New York.
3. Antunes, D., H. Thomas. 2007. The competitive (dis)advantages of European business schools. Long Range Planning 40(3) 382-404.
4. Augier, M., M. Prietula. 2007. Historical roots of the A Behavioral Theory of the Firm model at GSIA. Organ. Sci. 18(3) 507-522.
5. Barry, J., J. Chandler, H. Clark. 2001. Between the ivory tower and the academic assembly line. J. Management Stud. 38(1) 87-101.
6. Barnard, J. W. 1998. Reflections on Britain's research assessment exercise. J. Legal Ed. 48(4) 467-495.
7. Bedeian, A. G. 2003. The manuscript review process: The proper roles of authors, referees, and editors. J. Management Enquiry 12(4) 331-338.
8. Bedeian, A. G. 2004. Peer review and the social construction of knowledge in the management discipline. Acad. Management Learn. Ed. 3(2) 198-216.
9. Bence, V., C. Oppenheim. 2004. The influence of peer review on the research assessment exercise. J. Inform. Sci. 30(4) 347-368.
10. Ben-David, J. 1971. The Scientist's Role in Society. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
11. Bettis, R. A. 1991. Strategic management and the straightjacket: An editorial essay. Organ. Sci. 2(3) 315-319.
12. Bourdieu, P. 2004. Science of Science and Reflexivity. Polity Press, Cambridge, UK.
13. Boyd, B. K., S. Finkelstein, S. Gove. 2005. How advanced is the strategy paradigm? The role of particularism and universalism in shaping research outcomes. Strategic Management J. 26(9) 841-854.
14. Bunting, C. 2005. Early careers spent grinding teeth, not cutting them. Times Higher Ed. Suppl. (February 25) 18.
15. Caswill, C. 1992. Academies, Research Councils And Universities: Their Role in Modern Europe. Academia Europaea, London.
16. Chandler, A. D., Jr. 1962. Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the American Industrial Enterprise. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
17. Council of Europe. 1995-1997. Social sciences and the challenge of transition. Accessed October 2006, http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/highereducation/CompletedActivities/SocialSciences_EN.asp.
18. Courpasson, D., Z. Guedri. 2007. Les professeurs-chercheurs en management face à la performance scientifique. Revue Francaise de Gestion 33(178-179) 173-194.
19. Cunningham, R., ed. 1999. Interdisciplinarity and the Organization of Knowledge in Europe. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
20. Daft, R. L., V. Buenger. 1990. Hitching a ride on a fast train to nowhere: The past and future of strategic management research. J. W. Fredrickson, ed. Perspectives on Strategic Management. Harper Business, New York, 81-103.
21. Daft, R. L., A. Y. Lewin. 2008. Rigor and relevance in organization studies: Idea migration and academic journal evolution. Organ. Sci. 19(1) 177-183.
22. Furrer, O., H. Thomas, A. Goussevskaia. 2008. The structure and evolution of the strategic management field: A content analysis of 26 years of strategic management research. Internat. J. Management Rev. 10(1) 1-23.
23. Hafsi, T., H. Thomas. 2005. The field of strategy: In search of a walking stick. Eur. Management J. 23(5) 507-519.
24. Hambrick, D. C., M.-J. Chen. 2005. New academic fields as social movements: The case of strategic management. Acad. Management Best Paper Proc., Honolulu, Academy of Management, Briarcliff Manor, NY.
25. Hoskisson, R. E., M. A. Hitt, W. P. Wan, D. Yiu. 1999. Theory and research in strategic management: Swings of a pendulum. J. Management 25(3) 417-456.
26. Jemison, D. B. 1981. The importance of an integrative approach to strategic management research. Acad. Management Rev. 6(4) 601-608.
27. Johnson, G., A. Langley, L. Melin, R. Whittington. 2007. Strategy as Practice: Research Directions and Resources. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
28. Lampel, J., J. A. C. Baum. 2010. The globalization of strategy research: Permanent pluralism or prelude to a new synthesis?. J. A. C. Baum, J. Lampel, eds. The Globalization of Strategy Research: Advances in Strategic Management, Vol. 27. Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK, xiii-xxxii.
29. Lampel, J., Z. Shapira. 1995. Progress and its discontents: Data scarcity and the limits of falsification in strategic management. Adv. Strategic Management 12A 113-150.
30. Lock, K., K. Golden-Biddle, M. S. Feldman. 2008. Making doubt generative: Rethinking the role of doubt in the research process. Organ. Sci. 19(6) 907-918.
31. Macdonald, S., J. Kam. 2007. Ring a ring o' roses: Quality journals and gamesmanship in management studies. J. Management Stud. 44(4) 640-655.
32. Mahoney, J. T. 1993. Strategic management and determinism: Sustaining the conversation. J. Management Stud. 30(1) 173-191.
33. Miner, J. 2003. Commentary on Arthur Bedeian's "The manuscript review process: The proper roles of authors, referees, and editors." J. Management Inquiry 12(4) 339-343.
34. Mintzberg, H., B. Ahlstrand, J. Lampel. 2009. Strategy Safari: Complete Guide Through the Wilds of Strategic Management, 2nd ed. Pearson Education, Harlow, UK.
35. Muller-Camen, M., S. Salzgeber. 2005. Changes in academic work and the chair regime: The case of German business administration academics. Organ. Stud. 26(2) 271-290.
36. Nag, R., D. C. Hambrick, M.-J. Chen. 2007. What is strategic management, really? Inductive derivation of a consensus definition of the field. Strategic Management J. 28(9) 935-955.
37. Osigweh, C. A. B. 1989. Concept fallibility in organization science. Acad. Management Rev. 14(4) 579-594.
38. Peirce, C. S. 1934. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce: Pragmatisms and Pragmaticism, Vol. 5. Edited by C. Hartshorne and P. Weiss. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
39. Pfeffer, J. 2007. A modest proposal: How we might change the process and product of managerial research. Acad. Management J. 50(6) 1334-1345.
40. Ramos-Rodriguez, A.-R., J. Ruiz-Navarro. 2004. Changes in the intellectual structure of strategic management research: A bibliometric study of the Strategic Management Journal, 1980-2000. Strategic Management J. 25(10) 981-1004.
41. Rescher, N. 1976. Peirce's Philosophy of Science: Critical Studies in His Theory of Induction and Scientific Method. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, IN.
42. Rumelt, R. P., D. E. Schendel, D. J. Teece. 1994. Fundamental issues in strategy. R. P. Rumelt, D. E. Schendel, D. J. Teece, eds. Fundamental Issues in Strategy: A Research Agenda. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
43. Schendel, D. E., C. W. Hofer. 1979. Theory building and theory testing in strategic management. D. E. Schendel, C. W. Hofer, eds. Strategic Management: A New View of Business Policy and Planning. Little Brown and Company, Boston, 382-393.
44. Servan-Schreiber, J.-J. 1967. Le Défi Américain. Denoël, Paris.
45. Sousa, C. A. A., P. H. J. Hendriks. 2007. That obscure object of desire: The management of academic knowledge. Minerva 45(3) 259-274.
46. Starbuck, W. H. 2005. How much better are the most-prestigious journals? The statistics of academic publications. Organ. Sci. 16(2) 180-200.
47. Starkey, K., N. Tiratsoo. 2007. The Business School and the Bottom Line. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
48. Staw, B. M. 1985. Repairs on the road to relevance and rigor: Some unexplored issues in publishing organizational research. L. L. Cummings, P. J. Forst, eds. Publishing in the Organizational Sciences. Irwin, Homewood, IL, 96-107.
49. Symon, G., A. Buehring, P. Johnson, C. Cassell. 2008. Positioning qualitative research as resistance to the institutionalization of the academic labour process. Organ. Stud. 29(10) 1315-1336.
50. Thietart, R.-A. 2009. The research challenge of French business schools: The case of the Grandes Écoles. J. Management Development 28(8) 711-717.
51. Thomas, H., A. Wilson. 2009. An analysis of the environment and competitive dynamics of management research. J. Management Dev. 28(8) 668-684.
52. Wensley, R. 2009. Research in UK business schools or management research in the UK? J. Management Development 28(8) 718-727.