Evidence for a subtractive component in motion adaptation

Vision Research

Volumn 51, Issue 21-22, 2011, Pages 2312-2316

  Morgan, M J ^a   Chubb, C ^b   Solomon, J A ^c  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR NEUROLOGICAL RESEARCH   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c CITY UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Calibration; Contrast discrimination; Flicker; Motion adaptation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; CONTRAST; CONTROLLED STUDY; MOTOR COORDINATION; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECALIBRATION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SPATIAL DISCRIMINATION; TEMPORAL SUMMATION; VISUAL ADAPTATION; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION;

ADAPTATION, OCULAR; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; HUMANS; MOTION PERCEPTION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SENSORY THRESHOLDS;

EID: 82455188091     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: 18785646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.09.002     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Barlow H.B., Hill R.M. Evidence for a physiological explanation of the waterfall phenomenon and figural after-effects. Nature 1963, 200:1345-1347.
2. Blake R., et al. Strength of early visual adaptation depends on visual awareness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2006, 103(12):4783-4788.
3. Brainard D.H. The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision 1997, 10:433-436.
4. Efron B. The jackknife, the bootstrap and other resampling plans 1982, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia.
5. Foley J.M., Chen C.C. Analysis of the effects of pattern adaption on pattern pedestal effects: A two-process model. Vision Research 1997, 37:2781-2788.
6. Gibson J.J. Perception of curved lines. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1933, 16:26-31.
7. Gibson J.J., Radner M. Adaptation and contrast in the perception of tilted lines. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1937, 20:453-469.
8. Harris L., Morgan M., Still A. Moving and the motion aftereffect. Nature 1981, 293:139-141.
9. Hassenstein B., Reichardt W. Systemtheoretische Analyse der Zeir-, Reihenfolgen- und Vorzeichenauswertung bei der Bewgungsperzeptiion des Russelkafers Chlorophanus. Zeitshchrift fur Naturforschung B 1956, 11:513-525.
10. Heeger D.J., et al. Motion opponency in visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience 1999, 19:7162-7174.
11. Hoel P.G., Port S.C., Stone C.J. Introduction to statistical theory 1971, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
12. Keck M.J., Palella T.D., Pantle A. Motion aftereffect as a function of the contrast of sinusoidal gratings. Vision Research 1976, 16:187-191.
13. Kohn A., Movshon J. Neuronal adaptation to visual motion in area MT of the Macaque. Neuron 2003, 39:681-691.
14. Legge G.E., Foley J.M. Contrast masking in human vision. Journal of the Optical Society of America 1980, 70(12):1458-1471.
15. The motion aftereffect: A modern perspective 1998, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. G. Mather, F. Verstraten, S. Anstis (Eds.).
16. Leopold D., O'Toole A., Vetter T., Blanz V. Prototype-references shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects. Nature Neuroscience 2001, 4:89-94.
17. Morgan M. Wohlgemuth was right: Distracting attention from the adapting stimulus does not decrease the motion after-effect. Vision Research 2011, 50(20):2169-2175.
18. Morgan M., Chubb C., Solomon J.A. Predicting the motion after-effect from sensitivity loss. Vision Research 2006, 46(15):2412-2420.
19. Reichardt W. Autocorrelation, a principle for the evaluation of sensory information by the central nervous system. Sensory communication 1961, Wiley, New York. W.A. Rosenblith (Ed.).
20. Rezec A., Krekelberg B., Dobkins K.R. Attention enhances adaptability: Evidence from motion adaptation experiments. Vision Research 2004, 44(26):3035-3044.
21. Schwartz S., et al. Attentional load and sensory competition in human vision: Modulation of fMRI responses by load at fixation during task-irrelevant stimulation in the peripheral visual field. Cerebral Cortex 2005, 15(6):770-786.
22. Sekuler R., Ganz L. Aftereffect of seen motion with a stabilized retinal image. Science 1963, 139:419-420.
23. Sekuler R., Pantle A. A model for aftereffects of seen movement. Vision Research 1967, 7:427-439.
24. Snowden R., Treue S., Erickson R., Andersen R. The response of area MT and V1 neurons to transparent motion. Journal of Neuroscience 1991, 11(9):2768-2785.
25. Solomon J.A., Chubb C., John A., Morgan M. Stimulus contrast and the Reichardt detector. Vision Research 2005, 45(16):2109-2117.
26. Sutherland N.S. Figural aftereffects and apparent size. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1961, 13:222-228.
27. Watson A.B., Pelli D.G. QUEST: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method. Perception and Psychophysics 1983, 33(2):113-120.
28. Webster M.A., Georgeson M.A., Webster S.M. Neural adjustments to image blur. Nature Neuroscience 2002, 5(9):839-840.