The Persistence of Epistemic Objects Through Scientific Change

Erkenntnis

Volumn 75, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 413-429

  Chang, Hasok ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 82455187917     PISSN: 01650106     EISSN: 15728420     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10670-011-9340-9     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Allchin, D. (1992). Phlogiston after oxygen. Ambix, 39, 110-116.
2. Arabatzis, T. (2006). Representing electrons: A biographical approach to theoretical entities. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
3. Bensaude-Vincent, B. (1996). Between history and memory: Centennial and bicentennial images of Lavoisier. Isis, 87, 481-499.
4. Cardwell, D. S. L. (Ed.). (1968). John Dalton and the progress of science. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
5. Chang, H. (2004). Inventing temperature: Measurement and scientific progress. New York: Oxford University Press.
6. Chang, H. (2008). Contingent transcendental arguments for metaphysical principles. In M. Massimi (Ed.), Kant and philosophy of science today (pp. 113-133). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Chang, H. (2009a). "Operationalism", Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Online at http://plato. stanford. edu/entries/operationalism.
8. Chang, H. (2009b). We have never been whiggish (about phlogiston). Centaurus, 51, 239-264.
9. Chang, H. (2010). The hidden history of phlogiston: How philosophical failure can generate historiographical refinement. HYLE-International Journal for Philosophy of Chemistry, 16, 47-79.
10. 2O? Evidence, pluralism and realism. Dordrecht: Springer.
11. Conant, J. B. (1957). The overthrow of the phlogiston theory: The Chemical Revolution of 1775-1789. In J. B. Conant (Ed.), Harvard case histories in experimental science (Vol. 1, pp. 65-115). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12. Daston, L. (Ed.). (2000). Biographies of scientific objects. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
13. Elliott, J. (1780). Philosophical observations on the senses of vision and hearing; to which are added, a treatise on harmonic sounds, and an essay on combustion and animal heat. London: J. Murray.
14. Hoyningen-Huene, P. (2008). Thomas Kuhn and the Chemical Revolution. Foundations of Chemistry, 10, 101-115.
15. Kellert, S. H., Longino, H. E., & Waters, C. K. (Eds.). (2006). Scientific pluralism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
16. Klein, U. (1994). Origin of the concept of chemical compound. Science in Context, 7(2), 163-204.
17. Klein, U. (1996). The chemical workshop tradition and the experimental practice: Discontinuities within continuities. Science in Context, 9(3), 251-287.
18. Klein, U., & Lefèvre, W. (2007). Materials in eighteenth-century science. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press.
19. Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
20. Lavoisier, A.-L. (1789). Traité élémentaire de chimie. Paris: Cuchet.
21. Lavoisier, A.-L. (1965). Elements of chemistry, with an introduction by D. McKie. New York: Dover (reprint of R. Kerr's English translation (1790) of Lavoisier 1789).
22. Lewis, G. N. (1926). The anatomy of science. New Haven: Yale University Press.
23. McEvoy, J. G. (1997). Positivism, whiggism, and the Chemical Revolution: A study in the historiography of chemistry. History of Science, 35, 1-33.
24. Odling, W. (1871). On the revived theory of phlogiston (address at the Royal Institution, 28 April 1871). Proceedings of the Royal Institution of Great Britain, 6, 315-325.
25. Partington, J. R., & McKie, D. (1937-1939). Historical studies on the phlogiston theory. Annals of Science, 2, 361-404; 3, 1-58, 337-371; 4, 113-149 (in four parts).
26. Rheinberger, H.-J. (1997). Toward a history of epistemic things: Synthesizing proteins in the test tube. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
27. Rheinberger, H.-J. (2005). A reply to David Bloor: 'Toward a sociology of epistemic things'. Perspectives on Science, 13, 406-410.
28. Siegfried, R. (2002). From elements to atoms: A history of chemical composition. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.
29. Stanford, P. K., & Kitcher, P. (2000). Refining the causal theory of reference for natural kind terms. Philosophical Studies, 97, 99-129.
30. Sudduth, W. M. (1978). Eighteenth-century identifications of electricity with phlogiston. Ambix, 25, 131-147.