Prevention of antisocial behavior in children - Ethical implications of a neurobiological approach;Prävention antisozialen verhaltens bei kindern - Ethische implikationen eines neurobiologischen ansatzes

Nervenheilkunde

Volumn 30, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 992-996

  Horstkötter, Dorothee ^a   Berghmans, R ^a   De Wert, G ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Antisocial behavior; Children; Ethics; Prevention

Indexed keywords

ANTISOCIAL BEHAVIOR; CHILD; CHILD PSYCHIATRY; ETHICS; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; NEUROBIOLOGY; REVIEW;

EID: 82455184292     PISSN: 07221541     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (20)

1. Shirtcliff EA, Vitacco MJ, Graf AR, Gostisha AJ, Merz JL, Zahn-Waxler C. Neurobiology of empathy and callousness: Implications for the development of antisocial behavior. Behavioral Sciences and the Law 2009; 27: 137-71.
2. Baker LA, Bezdijan S, Raine A. Behavioral genetics: The science of antisocial behavior. In: Farahany NA, Herausgeber. The impact of behavioral sciences on criminal law. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press 2009; 3-44.
3. Fishbein DH. The science, treatment, and prevention of antisocial behaviors. Kingston, NJ: Civic Research Institute 2000.
4. Hodgins S, Viding E, Plodowski A. The neurobiological basis of violence. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press 2009.
5. Dreßing H, Sartorius A, Meyer-Lindenberg A. Welche Bedeutung hat die neurobiologische Forschung für die forensische Psychiatrie? Forensische Psychiatrie, Psychologie, Kriminologie 2007; 1: 241-8.
6. Beauchaine TP, Neuhaus E, Brenner SL, Gatzke- Kopp L. Ten good reasons to consider biological processes in prevention and intervention research. Development and Psychopathology 2008; 20: 745-74. (Pubitemid 352005781)
7. van Goozen SHM, Fairchild G. How can the study of biological processes help designing new interventions for children with severe antisocial behavior? Development and Psychopathology 2008; 20: 941-73. (Pubitemid 352003605)
8. Fishbein DH. How can neurobiological research inform prevention strategies? In: Fishbein DH (ed.). The science, treatment, and prevention of antisocial behaviors: Application to the criminal justice system. Kingston, NJ: Civic Research Institute 2000.
9. Sterzer P. Born to be criminal? What to make of early biological risk factors for criminal behavior. American Journal of Psychiatry 2010; 167: 1-3.
10. Blank RH. Policy implications of the new neuroscience. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2007; 16: 169-80.
11. Farahany NA (Hrsg.). The impact of behavioral sciences on criminal law. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press 2009.
12. Illes J (Hrsg.). Neuroethics: Defining the issues in theory, practice, and policy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press 2006.
13. Glannon W. Bioethics and the brain. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press 2007.
14. Singh I, Rose N. Biomarkers in psychiatry. Nature 2009; 460: 202-7.
15. Skolnick Weisberg D, Keil FC, Goodstein J, Rawson E, Gray JR. The seductive allure of neuroscience explanations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2008; 20: 470-7. (Pubitemid 351317605)
16. Moffitt TE. The new look of behavioral genetics in developmental psychopathology: Gene-environment interplay in antisocial behavior. Psychological Bulletin 2005; 131: 533-54. (Pubitemid 41168495)
17. McCrory E, De Brito SA, Viding E. Research Review: The neurobiology and genetics of maltreatment and adversity. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 2010; 51: 1079-95.
18. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of bioethics. 6th ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press 2008.
19. Farrington DP, Welsh BC. Saving children from a life of crime, Early risk factors and effective interventions. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press 2007.
20. Centrum voor Criminaliteitspreventie en Veiligheid. Trendsignalement 2010, Ontwikkelingen in maatschappelijke veiligheid. Utrecht, NL 2010.