A logic for because

Review of Symbolic Logic

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 445-465

  Schnieder, Benjamin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 82455175618     PISSN: 17550203     EISSN: 17550211     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1755020311000104     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Allen, R. E. (1970). Plato's 'Euthyphro' and the Earlier Theory of Forms. London: Routledge.
2. Ambrose, A. (1956). On entailment and logical necessity. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 56,241-258.
3. Audi, P. (manuscript). Grounding. Toward a theory of the in-virtue-or-relation. Unpublished manuscript.
4. Batchelor, R. (2010). Grounds and consequences. Grazer Philosophische Studien, 80, 65-77.
5. Bender, E., & Kathol, A. (2001). Constructional Effects of "Just Because... Doesn't Mean..." Berkeley Linguistics Society: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting, 27, 13-25.
6. Bolzano, B. (1837). Wissenschaftslehre, (4 Vols.) Sulzbach, Germany: Seidel. Reprinted in Bernard Bolzano Gesamtausgabe I.11-I.14. Stuttgart, Germany: Frommann-Holzboog (1985ff.).
7. Bromberger, S. (1962). An approach to explanation. In Butler, R. J., editor. Analytical Philosophy, Vol. 2. Oxford, UK: Blackwell, pp. 72-105.
8. Correia, F. (2005). Existential Dependence and Cognate Notions. Munich, Germany: Philosophia.
9. Correia, F. (2010). Grounding and truth-functions. Logique & Analyse, 53, 251-279.
10. Cross, C. B. (1991). Explanation and the theory ofquestions. Erkenntnis, 34, 237-260.
11. Dowe, P. (2000). Causality and explanation. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 51, 165-174.
12. Dretske, F. (1972). Contrastive statements. Philosophical Review, 81,411-437.
13. Fine, K. (1994). Essence and modality. Philosophical Perspectives, 8, 1-16.
14. Fine, K. (2000). Neutral relations. Philosophical Review, 109, 1-33.
15. Fine, K. (2001). The question ofrealism. Philosophers' Imprint, 1, 1-30.
16. Fine, K. (forthcoming) A guide to ground. To appear in a volume on grounding edited by Fabrice Correia and Benjamin Schnieder for CUP.
17. Glanzberg, M. (2005). Focus: A case study on the semantics-pragmatics boundary. In Szabó, Z. G., editor. Semantics versus Pragmatics. Oxford, UK: OUP, pp. 72-110.
18. Hempel, C. (1965). Aspects of Scientific Explanation. New York, NY: Free Press.
19. Hesslow, G. (1981). The transitivity of causation. Analysis, 41, 130-133.
20. Hornsby, J. (2005). Truth without truthmaking entities. In Beebee, H., and Dodd, J., editors. Truthmakers: The Contemporary Debate. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press, pp. 33-47.
21. Horwich, P. (2008). Being and truth. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 32, 258-273.
22. Kac, M. B. (1972). Clauses of saying and the interpretation of because. Language, 48, 626-632.
23. Kim, J. (1974). Noncausal connections Noûs, 8, 41-52.
24. Kitcher, P. (1981). Explanatory unification. Philosophy of Science, 48, 507-531.
25. Künne, W. (2003). Conceptions of Truth. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
26. Lewis, D. (1986). Causal explanation. In his Philosophical Papers II. Oxford, UK: OUP, pp. 214-240.
27. Mc Queen, D. (1971). Evidence for necessary propositions. Mind, 80, 56-69.
28. Morreal, J. (1979). The evidential use of because. Papers in Linguistics, 12, 231-238.
29. Nickel, B. (2010). How general do theories of explanation have to be? Noûs, 44, 305-328.
30. Owens, D. J. (1992). Causes and Coincidences. Cambridge, MA: CUP.
31. Pelletier, F J. (1999). A briefhistory ofnatural deduction. History and Philosophy of Logic, 20, 1-31.
32. Railton, P(1981). Probability, explanation, and information. Synthese, 48, 233-256.
33. Read, S. (2000). Truthmakers and the disjunction thesis. Mind, 109, 67-79.
34. Rodriguez-Pereyra, G. (2005). Why truthmakers. In Beebee, H., and Dodd, J., editors. Truthmakers: The Contemporary Debate. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press, pp. 17-31.
35. Rodriguez-Pereyra, G. (2006) Truthmaking, entailment, and the conjunction thesis. Mind, 115, 957-982.
36. Rosen, G. (2010). Metaphysical dependence: Grounding and reduction. In Hale, B., and Hoffmann, A., editors. Modality. Oxford, UK: OUP, pp. 109-135.
37. Schaffer, J. (2003). Is there a fundamental level? Noûs, 37, 498-517.
38. Schaffer, J. (2009). On what grounds what. In Chalmers, D., Manley, D., and Wasserman, R., editors. Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology. Oxford, UK: OUP, pp. 347-383.
39. Schaffer, J. (2010). The least discerning and most promiscuous truthmaker. Philosophical Quarterly, 60, 307-324.
40. Schnieder, B. (2006). Truth-making without truth-makers. Synthese, 152, 21-47.
41. Schnieder, B. (2008). Truth-functionality. Review of Symbolic Logic, 1, 64-72.
42. Sharvy, R. (1972). Euthyphro 9d-11b: Analysis and definition in Plato and others. Noûs, 6, 119-137.
43. Sharvy, R. (1986). Plato's causal logic and the third man. Noûs, 20, 507-530.
44. Simons, P. (1987). Parts. Oxford, UK: OUP.
45. Tatzel, A. (2002). Bolzano's theory of ground and consequence. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 43, 1-25.
46. van Fraassen, B. (1980). The Scientific Image. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
47. Woodward, J. (1984). Explanatory asymmetries. Philosophy of Science, 51, 421-442.