Ecological conditions influence sentinel decisions

Animal Behaviour

Volumn 82, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1435-1441

  Hollen L I ^a   Bell, M B V ^b   Wade, H M ^c   Rose, R ^c   Russell, A ^c   Niven, F ^c   Ridley, A R ^d   Radford, A N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^c Pied Babbler Research Project   (South Africa)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN   (South Africa)

Author keywords

Behavioural variation; Decision making; Environment; Information; Pied babbler; Sentinel; Turdoides bicolor; Vocal communication

Indexed keywords

ANTIPREDATOR DEFENSE; BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY; COOPERATIVE BREEDING; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FORAGING BEHAVIOR; GRASSLAND; GROUP BEHAVIOR; HABITAT QUALITY; HABITAT STRUCTURE; PASSERINE; PREDATION RISK; SIGNALING; VIGILANCE; VOCALIZATION; WIND PROFILE;

AVES; TURDOIDES BICOLOR;

EID: 82355181006     PISSN: 00033472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.09.028     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Arenz C.L., Leger D.W. The antipredator vigilance of adult and juvenile thirteen-lined ground squirrels (Sciuridae: Spermophilus tridecemlineatus): visual obstruction and simulated hawk attacks. Ethology 1997, 103:945-953.
2. Baayen, R. H. 2010. languageR: data sets and functions with 'Analyzing Linguistic Data: A practical introduction to statistics'. R package version 1.0. http://cran.r-project.org/package%3DlanguageR.
3. Bates, D. & Maechler, M. 2010. lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999375-37. http://cran.r-project.org/package%3Dlme4.
4. Bednekoff P.A. Mutualism among safe selfish sentinels: a dynamic game. American Naturalist 1997, 150:373-392.
5. Bell M.B.V., Radford A.N., Rose R., Wade H.M., Ridley A.R. The value of constant surveillance in a risky environment. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 2009, 276:2997-3005.
6. Bell M.B.V., Radford A.N., Smith R.A., Thompson A., Ridley A.R. Bargaining babblers: vocal negotiation of cooperative behaviour in a social bird. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 2010, 277:3223-3228.
7. Blumstein D.T., Fernández-Juricic E., LeDee O., Larsen E., Rodriguez-Prieto I., Zugmeyer C. Avian risk assessment: effects of perching height and detectability. Ethology 2004, 110:273-285.
8. Carr J.M., Lima S.L. High wind speeds decrease the responsiveness of birds to potentially threatening moving stimuli. Animal Behaviour 2010, 80:215-220.
9. Clutton-Brock T.H., O'Riain M.J., Brotherton P.N.M., Gaynor D., Kansky R., Griffin A.S., Manser M. Selfish sentinels in cooperative mammals. Science 1999, 284:1640-1644.
10. Devereux C.L., Whittingham M.J., Fernandez-Juricic E., Vickery J.A., Krebs J.R. Predator detection and avoidance by starlings under differing scenarios of predation risk. Behavioral Ecology 2006, 17:303-309.
11. Dolby A.S., Grubb T.C. Effects of winter weather on horizontal vertical use of isolated forest fragments by bark-foraging birds. Condor 1999, 101:408-412.
12. Elliot R.D. The exclusion of avian predators from aggregations of nesting lapwings Vanellus vanellus. Animal Behaviour 1985, 33:308-314.
13. Emlen S.T. An evolutionary theory of the family. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 1995, 92:8092-8099.
14. Fernández-Juricic E., Erichsen J.T., Kacelnik A. Visual perception and social foraging in birds. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 2004, 19:25-31.
15. Gaston A.J. Social behaviour within groups of jungle babblers, Turdoides striatus. Animal Behaviour 1977, 25:828-848.
16. Gotmark F., Andersson M. Predation by sparrowhawks decreases with increased breeding density in a songbird, the great tit. Oecologia 2005, 142:177-183.
17. Griesser M., Nystrand M. Vigilance and predation of forest-living bird species depend on large-scale habitat structure. Behavioral Ecology 2009, 20:709-715.
18. Griffiths R., Double M.C., Orr K., Dawson R.J.G. A DNA test to sex most birds. Molecular Ecology 1998, 7:1071-1075.
19. Hamilton W.D. The genetical evolution of social behaviour. Journal of Theoretical Biology 1964, 7:1-52.
20. Hamilton W.D. Geometry for the selfish herd. Journal of Theoretical Biology 1971, 31:295-311.
21. Hilton G.M., Ruxton G.D., Cresswell W. Choice of foraging area with respect to predation risk in redshanks: the effects of weather and predator activity. Oikos 1999, 87:295-302.
22. Hollén L.I., Radford A.N. The development of alarm call behaviour in mammals and birds. Animal Behaviour 2009, 78:791-800.
23. Hollén L.I., Bell M.B.V., Radford A.N. Cooperative sentinel calling? Foragers gain increased biomass intake. Current Biology 2008, 18:576-579.
24. Hollén, L. I., Bell, M. B. V., Russell, A., Niven, F., Ridley, A. R. & Radford, A. N. 2011. Calling by concluding sentinels: coordinating cooperation or revealing risk. PLoS ONE, published online 3 October 2011, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0025010.
25. Johnstone R.A. Conspiratorial whispers and conspicuous displays: games of signal detection. Evolution 1998, 52:1554-1563.
26. Kilner R., Johnstone R.A. Begging the question: are offspring solicitation behaviours signals of need?. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 1997, 12:11-15.
27. Klump G.M., Shalter M.D. Acoustic behaviour of birds and mammals in the predator context. I: Factors affecting the structure of alarm signals. II: The functional significance and evolution of alarm signals. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 1984, 66:189-226.
28. Kokko H., Johnstone R.A., Clutton-Brock T.H. The evolution of cooperative breeding through group augmentation. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 2001, 268:187-196.
29. Krause J., Ruxton G.D. Living in Groups 2004, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
30. Lazarus J., Symonds M. Contrasting effects of protective and obstructive cover on avian vigilance. Animal Behaviour 1992, 43:519-521.
31. Lehmann L., Rousset F. How life history and demography promote or inhibit the evolution of helping behaviours. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 2010, 365:2599-2617.
32. Lengagne T., Slater P.J.B. The effects of rain on acoustic communication: tawny owls have good reason for calling less in wet weather. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 2002, 269:2121-2125.
33. Lima S.L., Dill L.M. Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Canadian Journal of Zoology 1990, 68:619-640.
34. Manser M.B. Response of foraging group members to sentinel calls in suricates, Suricata suricatta. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 1999, 266:1013-1019.
35. Mateo J.M. Ecological and hormonal correlates of antipredator behaviour in adult Belding's ground squirrels (Spermophilus beldingi). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 2007, 62:37-49.
36. Mathevon N., Aubin T., Dabelsteen T. Song degradation during propagation: importance of song post for the wren Troglodytes troglodytes. Ethology 1996, 102:397-412.
37. Metcalfe N.B. The effects of habitat on the vigilance of shorebirds: is visibility important?. Animal Behaviour 1984, 32:981-985.
38. Nelson-Flower M.J., Hockey P.A.R., O'Ryan C., Raihani N.J., du Plessis M.A., Ridley A.R. Monogamous dominant pairs monopolize reproduction in the cooperatively breeding pied babbler. Behavioral Ecology 2011, 22:559-565.
39. Palombit R.A. A preliminary study of vocal communication in wild long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis). II. Potential of calls to regulate intergroup spacing. International Journal of Primatology 1992, 13:183-207.
40. Quinn J.L., Whittingham M.J., Butler S.J., Cresswell W. Noise, predation risk compensation and vigilance in the chaffinch Fringilla coelebs. Journal of Avian Biology 2006, 37:601-608.
41. R Development Core Team R: a Language and Environment for Statistical Computing 2010, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.r-project.org/.
42. Radford A.N. Vocal mediation of foraging competition in the cooperatively breeding green woodhoopoe, Phoeniculus purpureus. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 2004, 56:279-285.
43. Radford A.N., du Plessis M.A. Territorial vocal rallying in the green woodhoopoe: factors affecting contest length and outcome. Animal Behaviour 2004, 68:803-810.
44. Radford A.N., Ridley A.R. Recruitment calling: a novel form of parental care in a cooperatively breeding species. Current Biology 2006, 16:1700-1704.
45. Radford A.N., Ridley A.R. Individuals in foraging groups may use vocal cues when assessing their need for anti-predator vigilance. Biology Letters 2007, 3:249-252.
46. Radford A.N., Ridley A.R. Close calling regulates spacing between foraging competitors in the group-living pied babbler. Animal Behaviour 2008, 75:519-527.
47. Radford A.N., Hollén L.I., Bell M.B.V. The higher the better: sentinel height influences foraging success in a social bird. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 2009, 276:2437-2442.
48. Radford A.N., Bell M.B.V., Hollén L.I., Ridley A.R. Singing for your supper: sentinel calling by kleptoparasites mitigates the cost to victims. Evolution 2011, 65:900-906.
49. Raihani N.J., Ridley A.R. Adult vocalizations during provisioning: offspring response and postfledging benefits in the wild pied babblers. Animal Behaviour 2007, 74:1303-1309.
50. Rasa O.A.E. Coordinated vigilance in dwarf mongoose family groups: the 'Watchman's Song' hypothesis and the costs of guarding. Ethology 1986, 71:340-344.
51. Ridley A.R., Raihani N.J. Facultative response to a kleptoparasite by the cooperatively breeding pied babbler. Behavioral Ecology 2007, 18:324-330.
52. Ridley A.R., Raihani N.J., Bell M.B.V. Experimental evidence that sentinel behaviour is affected by risk. Biology Letters 2010, 6:445-448.
53. Townsend S.W., Zöttl M., Manser M.B. All clear? Meerkats attend to contextual information in close calls to coordinate vigilance. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 2011, 65:1927-1934. 10.1007/s00265-011-1202-6.
54. Whittingham M.J., Evans K.L. The effect of habitat structure on predation risk of birds in agricultural landscapes. Ibis 2004, 146:210-220.
55. Whittingham M.J., Butler S., Quinn J.L., Cresswell W. The effect of limited visibility on vigilance behaviour and speed of predator detection: implications for the conservation of granivorous passerines. Oikos 2004, 106:377-385.
56. Wickler W. Coordination of vigilance in bird groups: the 'watchman's song' hypothesis. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 1985, 69:250-253.
57. Wiley R.H., Richards D.G. Adaptations for acoustic communication in birds: sound transmission and signal detection. Acoustic Communication in Birds 1982, 132-181. Academic Press, New York. D.E. Kroodsma, E.H. Miller (Eds.).
58. Woo K.L., Burke D., Peters R.A. Motion sensitivity of the Jacky dragon, Amphibolurus muricatus: random-dot kinematograms reveal the importance of motion noise for signal detection. Animal Behaviour 2009, 77:307-315.
59. Wright J., Berg E., de Kort S.R., Khazin V., Maklakov A.A. Cooperative sentinel behaviour in the Arabian babbler. Animal Behaviour 2001, 62:973-979.
60. Wright J., Berg E., de Kort S.R., Khazin V., Maklakov A.A. Safe selfish sentinels in a cooperative bird. Journal of Animal Ecology 2001, 70:1070-1079.