Entropy and Laplacian images: Structural representations for multi-modal registration

Medical Image Analysis

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 1-17

  Wachinger, Christian ^a   Navab, Nassir ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Entropy; Laplacian eigenmaps; Multi modal registration; Structural representation

Indexed keywords

ALTERNATIVE APPROACH; DATA SETS; IMAGE REPRESENTATIONS; INTENSITY DIFFERENCE; L2 DISTANCES; LAPLACIAN EIGENMAPS; LAPLACIANS; MANIFOLD LEARNING; MULTI-MODAL IMAGE; MULTIMODAL REGISTRATION; MUTUAL INFORMATIONS; OPTIMAL APPROXIMATION; OPTIMIZATION STRATEGY; RUNTIMES; SIMILARITY CALCULATION; SIMILARITY METRICS; STRUCTURAL REPRESENTATION;

COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; ENTROPY; LAPLACE TRANSFORMS; OPTIMIZATION;

MODAL ANALYSIS;

ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; ENTROPY; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; MACHINE LEARNING; MORPHOMETRICS; MULTI MODAL REGISTRATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ALGORITHMS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BRAIN; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SUBTRACTION TECHNIQUE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 82355161020     PISSN: 13618415     EISSN: 13618423     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2011.03.001     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Andronache A., von Siebenthal M., Székely G., Cattin P. Non-rigid registration of multi-modal images using both mutual information and cross-correlation. Medical Image Analysis 2008, 12:3-15.
2. Arandjelovic, O., Cipolla, R., 2007. A manifold approach to face recognition from low quality video across illumination and pose using implicit super-resolution. In: ICCV.
3. Belkin M., Niyogi P. Laplacian eigenmaps for dimensionality reduction and data representation. Neural Computatu=ion 2003, 15.
4. Benhimane, S., Malis, E., 2004. Real-time image-based tracking of planes using efficient second-order minimization. In: IEEE/RSJ, pp. 943-948.
5. Buzug T., Weese J., Fassnacht C., Lorenz C. Image registration: convex weighting functions for histogram-based similarity measures. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1997, 203-212.
6. Collignon, A., Vandermeulen, D., Suetens, P., Marchal, G., 1995. 3D multi-modality medical image registration using feature space clustering. In: Computer Vision, Virtual Reality and Robotics in Medicine.
7. Du S., Zheng N., Ying S., Liu J. Affine iterative closest point algorithm for point set registration. Pattern Recognition Letters 2010, 31:791-799.
8. Gerber, S., Tasdizen, T., Joshi, S., Whitaker, R., 2009. On the manifold structure of the space of brain images. In: MICCAI.
9. Haber E., Modersitzki J. Intensity gradient based registration and fusion of multi-modal images. Methods of Information in Medicine 2007, 46:292-299.
10. Hamm, J., Davatzikos, C., Verma, R., 2009. Efficient large deformation registration via geodesics on a learned manifold of images. In: MICCAI, pp. 680-687.
11. Kadir T., Brady M. Saliency, scale and image description. International Journal of Computer Vision 2001, 45:83-105.
12. Learned-Miller E.G. Data driven image models through continuous joint alignment. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 2006, 28:236-250.
13. Lee, C., Elgammal, A., 2007. Modeling view and posture manifolds for tracking. In: ICCV.
14. Lee, D., Hofmann, M., Steinke, F., Altun, Y., Cahill, N., Scholkopf, B., 2009. Learning similarity measure for multi-modal 3d image registration. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 186 -193.
15. Li S., Wang H., Soh W. Robust estimation of rotation angles from image sequences using the annealing M-estimator. Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision 1998, 8:181-192.
16. Lowe D.G. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. International Journal of Computer Vision 2004, 60:91-110.
17. Maintz J., van den Elsen P., Viergever M. Comparison of edge-based and ridge-based registration of CT and MR brain images. Medical Image Analysis 1996, 1:151-161.
18. Maintz, J., van der Elsen, P., Viergever, M., 1997. Registration of 3D medical images using simple morphological tools. In: International Conference on Information Processing in Medical Imaging, pp.204-217.
19. Mansoury S., Pasha E. Determination of maximum entropy probability distribution via Burg's measure of entropy. Applied Mathematical Sciences 2008, 2:2851-2858.
20. Mikolajczyk K., Schmid C. A performance evaluation of local descriptors. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 2005, 27:1615-1630.
21. Modersitzki, J.,2009. FAIR: flexible algorithms for image registration. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM).
22. Myronenko, A., Song, X., 2009. Image registration by minimization of residual complexity. In: IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).
23. Padfield, D., 2010. Masked FFT registration. In: Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).
24. Peng, Y., Ganesh, A., Wright, J., Xu, W., Ma, Y., 2010. RASL: robust alignment by sparse and low-rank decomposition for linearly correlated images. In: Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).
25. Penney G., Weese J., Little J., Desmedt P., Hill D., Hawkes D. A comparison of similarity measures for use in 2-d-3-d medical image registration. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 1998, 17:586-595.
26. Penney G., Griffin L., King A., Hawkes D. A novel framework for multi-modal intensity-based similarity measures based on internal similarity. SPIE 2008, 6914.
27. Pizarro, D., Bartoli, A., 2007. Shadow resistant direct image registration. In: SCIA, pp. 928-937.
28. Reddy B., Chatterji B. An FFT-based technique for translation, rotation, and scale-invariant image registration. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 1996, 5:1266-1271.
29. Roche A., Malandain G., Pennec X., Ayache N. The correlation ratio as a new similarity measure for multimodal image registration. Proc. of First Int. Conf. on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI'98) 1998, 1115-1124. Springer Verlag, Cambridge, USA.
30. Rohde, G.K., Wang, W., Peng, T., Murphy, R.F., 2008. Deformation-based nonlinear dimension reduction: applications to nuclear morphometry. In:ISBI.
31. Roweis S.T., Saul L.K. Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding. Science 2000, 290:2323-2326.
32. Rényi, A., 1961. On measures of entropy and information. In: Proc. Fourth Berkeley Symp. Math. Stat. and Probability, pp. 547-561.
33. Shechtman, E., Irani, M., 2007. Matching local self-similarities across images and videos. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.
34. Sizintsev, M., Derpanis, K., Hogue, A., 2008. Histogram-based search: a comparative study. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.
35. Tenenbaum J., Silva V., Langford J. A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction. Science 2000, 290:2319.
36. Wachinger, C., Navab, N., 2009. Similarity metrics and efficient optimization for simultaneous registration. In: IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).
37. Wachinger, C., Navab, N., 2010a. Manifold learning for multi-modal image registration. In: 11st British Machine Vision Conference (BMVC).
38. Wachinger, C., Navab, N., 2010b. Structural image representation for image registration. In: CVPR Workshops, IEEE Computer Society Workshop on Mathematical Methods in Biomedical Image Analysis (MMBIA), San Francisco, California.
39. Wachinger, C., Wein, W., Navab, N., 2007. Three-dimensional ultrasound mosaicing. In: International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI), Brisbane, Australia.
40. Wachinger, C., Mateus, D., Keil, A., Navab, N., 2010a. Manifold learning for patient position detection in MRI. In: IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
41. Wachinger, C., Yigitsoy, M., Navab, N., 2010b. Manifold learning for image-based breathing gating with application to 4D ultrasound. In: International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI), Beijing, China.
42. Wei, Y., Tao, L., 2010. Efficient histogram-based sliding window. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.
43. Wein W., Brunke S., Khamene A., Callstrom M., Navab N. Automatic CT-ultrasound registration for diagnostic imaging and image-guided intervention. Medical Image Analysis 2008, 12:577-585.
44. Wells W., Viola P., Atsumi H., Nakajima S., Kikinis R. Multi-modal volume registration by maximization of mutual information. Medical Image Analysis 1996, 1:35-51.
45. Yi, Z., Soatto, S., 2009. Nonrigid registration combining global and local statistics. In: CVPR, pp.2200-2207.
46. Zhang, Q., Souvenir, R., Pless, R., 2006. On manifold structure of cardiac MRI data: application to segmentation. In: CVPR, vol. 1, pp. 1092-1098.
47. Zöllei, L., Learned-Miller, E., Grimson, E., Wells, W., 2005. Efficient population registration of 3D data. In: Computer Vision for Biomedical Image Applications, ICCV.