|
|
Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 30-34
|
|
Microendoscopic versus open discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a prospective randomised study.
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
ADULT;
ARTICLE;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
CONVALESCENCE;
ENDOSCOPE;
ENDOSCOPY;
EQUIPMENT DESIGN;
FEMALE;
FOLLOW UP;
HUMAN;
INSTRUMENTATION;
INTERVERTEBRAL DISK HERNIA;
INTERVERTEBRAL DISKECTOMY;
LAMINECTOMY;
LUMBAR VERTEBRA;
MALE;
METHODOLOGY;
MICROSURGERY;
MIDDLE AGED;
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY;
PHYSIOLOGY;
PROSPECTIVE STUDY;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;
SPINAL CORD;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
ADULT;
DISKECTOMY;
ENDOSCOPES;
ENDOSCOPY;
EQUIPMENT DESIGN;
FEMALE;
FOLLOW-UP STUDIES;
HUMANS;
INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DISPLACEMENT;
LAMINECTOMY;
LUMBAR VERTEBRAE;
MALE;
MICROSURGERY;
MIDDLE AGED;
PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
RECOVERY OF FUNCTION;
SPINAL CORD;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
|
|
EID: 82255177100
PISSN: 10225536
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1177/230949901101900107 Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (95)
|
|
References (0)
|
