Attitudes of UK and Australian farmers towards monitoring activity with satellite technologies: Lessons to be learnt

Space Policy

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 202-212

  Purdy, Ray ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 82155195906     PISSN: 02659646     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.spacepol.2011.09.011     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Purdy R. Using earth observation for better regulatory compliance and enforcement of environmental laws. JEL 2010, 22(1):59-87.
2. Purdy R. Satellite Monitoring of Environmental Laws: Lessons to be Learnt from Australia 2010, UCL Report.
3. Smith D. Electronic mentoring of offenders: the Scottish experience. Criminology and Criminal Justice 2001, 1(2):201-214. E.g.
4. Blincoe K.M., Jones A.P., Sauerzapf V., Haynes R. Speeding drivers' attitudes and perceptions of speed cameras in rural England. Accid Anal Prev 2006, 38(2):371-378. E.g.
5. Ditton J Crime and the City. Public attitudes towards Open-Street CCTV in Glasgow. Brit J Criminol 2000, 40(4):692-709. E.g.
6. Statement by Storry, M., South Australian government. Personal Communication, 12 November 2009.
7. Statement by Kerr D., National Farmers Federation (Australia). Personal Communication, 19 November 2009.
8. Statement by survey respondent [Pa273].
9. Statement by survey respondent [Pa262].
10. Statement by survey respondent [Pa292].
11. Statement by survey respondent [Pa186].
12. Statement by survey respondent [Pa143].
13. Statement by survey respondent [Pa208].
14. Statement by survey respondent [Pa46].
15. Statement by survey respondent [Op184987].
16. Statement by survey respondent [Pa393].
17. Statement by survey respondent [Pa316].
18. Statement by survey respondent [Pa050].
19. Statement by survey respondent [Pa110].
20. Bartel R. Compliance and complicity: an assessment of the success of land clearance legislation in New South Wales. EPLJ 2003, 20(2):116-141.
21. Bricknell S. Environmental Crime in Australia. Research and Public Policy Series No. 109 2010, Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra.
22. Sheridan P. The Trading of Property Rights in Queensland for Political Power. An address to the Property Rights Australia Annual Conference 2009, Rockhampton, 27 June, 2009.
23. House of Commons Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee 2006, Rural Payments Agency. Fifth Report. HC 840, House of Commons, London.
24. Kerber R. When is a satellite photo an unreasonable Search?. Wall Street Journal January 27, 1998, New York: Dow Jones and Co.
25. Purdy R. op cite n2 2010.
26. Department of the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs v Nicholas John Dixon Chard Scheduled for Reading Magistrates Court 2001, [case dropped before court hearing].
27. Farm Facts: National Farmer's Federation <>; [accessed 3.04.11]. http://www.nff.org.au/farm-facts.html.
28. House of Lords Common Agricultural Policy: Single Farm Payment. House of Lords Written Answers 1 1 December 2009, vol. 715 (8). House of Lords, London.
29. Schmitt E. Liberties Advocates Fear Abuse of Satellite Images. The New York Times August 17, 2007, Arthur Ochs Sulzberger, New York.
30. Warrick J. Domestic Use of Spy Satellites to Widen. The Washington Post August 16 2007, News World Media Development, Washington D.C.
31. Crandall C. Why Aren't We using that Intel Stuff? Using Reconnaissance satellite imagery in Domestic Disaster Prevention and response. BYU L Rev 2011, 2(1):1831-1867.
32. A 2011 Report from the US Congress, Examining the Possibility of Using Satellites to Support Law Enforcement, Considered that this 'Raised Serious Concerns Among Members of Congress and Individuals and Groups Concerning the Possibility of Using Intelligence Resources as a Weapon Against US Persons' 2011, See, Best Jr R.A. and Elsea J.K. Satellite Surveillance: Domestic Issues, Congressional Research Service Report 7-5700, CRS, Washington D.C.
33. Doldirina C. What is Privacy?. Current Legal Issues for Satellite Earth Observation: Treaty Verification and Law Enforcement Through Satellite Observation, Privacy Conflicts from High Resolution Imaging 2010, European Space Policy Institute, Vienna. M. Sánchez Aranzamendi, R. Sandau, K. Schrogl (Eds.).
34. NSWCCA 31 (New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal) 2003, Director-General of Department of Land and Water Conservation v Greentree.
35. FCA 741 (Federal Court of Australia) 2004, Minister for the Environment & Heritage v Greentree (No 2).
36. Statement by Peterson A., PricewaterhouseCoopers (Australia). Personal Communication, 21 January 2010.
37. Statement by Lewis A., Geoscience Australia. Personal Communication, 18 November 2009.
38. Statement by Kay S., JRC, European Commission. Personal Communication, 5 December 2007.
39. Hines N., Webster P. Taxman Loses Sensitive Personal Data on 25 m People November 20, 2007, The Times; London: News Corporation.
40. Australian Law Reform Commission For Your Information: Australian Privacy Law and Practice 2008, Report 108, ALRC, Sydney.
41. Statement by Kay S., op cite n38.
42. Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General. 'Arable Area Payments Scheme,' 19 February 1999, HC 223 Session 1998-1999, National Audit Office.
43. House of Commons Committee of Public Records, 'Tackling Common Agricultural Policy Irregularities, House of Commons Papers No. 406 (Session 1997-98) 1996-97, HC268.
44. Purdy R. op cite n2.
45. Bbc EU Austerity Drive Country by Country 31 March 2011, BBC News Website, [accessed 3.04.11]. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/10162176.
46. Purdy R. Legal and privacy issues of spy in the sky satellites. MJLS 1999, 3(1):63-79.
47. Slonecker E.M., Shaw D.M., Lillesand T.M. Emerging legal and Ethical issues in advanced remote sensing. Photogram Eng Remote Sensing 1998, 64(6):589-595.
48. ISO standards are technical agreements, which provide the framework for compatible technology worldwide. See, International Organization for Standardization. Document Management - Information Stored Electronically - Recommendations for Trustworthiness and Reliability 2009, ISO, Geneva, Technical Report ISO/TR 15801. 2nd ed.
49. British Standards Institution Evidential Weight and Legal Admissibility of Electronic Information 2008, BS 10008:2008, BSI, London.
50. Statement by survey respondent [Pa174].
51. Statement by survey respondent [Pa137].