Books and canon building in sociology: The case of mind, self, and society

Journal of Classical Sociology

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 356-377

  da Silva, Filipe Carreira ^a   Vieira, Mónica Brito ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LISBON   (Portugal)

Author keywords

canon formation; history of books; Mead; sociological classics

Indexed keywords

EID: 82155195614     PISSN: 1468795X     EISSN: 17412897     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1468795X11415148     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Abbott ADepartment and Discipline: Chicago Sociology at One Hundred. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1999:.
2. Alexander JCStructure and meaning. Alexander JC, ed. New York: Columbia University Press; 1989:8-67.
3. Alexander JC.Iconic consciousness: The material of meaning.Environment and Planning D: Society and Space. 2008;26:782-794.
4. Baehr P,O'Brien M.Founders, classics and the concept of a canon.Current Sociology. 1994;42 (1): 1-147.
5. Baert P,Silva FCSocial Theory in the Twentieth Century and Beyond. Cambridge: Polity; 2010:.
6. Barbalet JWeber, Passion and Profits: 'The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism' in Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011:.
7. Becker HSOutsiders. New York: Free Press; 1963:.
8. Blumer HMan and Society. A Substantial Introduction to the Social Sciences. Schmidt E, ed. New York: Prentice-Hall; 1937:144-198.
9. Blumer H.Sociological implications of the thought of G.H. Mead.American Journal of Sociology. 1966;71:535-544.
10. Blumer HSymbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1969:.
11. Blumer H.Mead and Blumer: The convergent methodological perspectives of social behaviorism and symbolic interactionism.American Sociological Review. 1980;45 (3): 409-419.
12. Camic C.Three departments in search of a discipline: Localism and interdisciplinary interaction in American sociology, 1890-1940.Social Research. 1995;62 (4): 1003-1033.
13. Reclaiming the Sociological Classics: The State of the Scholarship. Camic C, ed. Oxford: Blackwell; 1997:.
14. Camic C.Classics in what sense?.Social Psychology Quarterly. 2008;71 (4): 324-330.
15. Connell RW.Why is classical theory classical?.American Journal of Sociology. 1997;102 (2): 1511-1557.
16. Cook GAGeorge Herbert Mead: The Making of a Social Pragmatist. Urbana: University of Illinois Press; 1993:.
17. Coser LMasters of Sociological Thought: Ideas in Historical and Social Context. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich; 1971:.
18. Coser LThe Future of Sociological Classics. Rhea B, ed. London: George Allen & Unwin; 1981:170-194.
19. Darnton R.What is the history of books?.Daedalus. 1982;111 (3): 65-83.
20. Durkheim ÉThe Elementary Forms of Religious Life. New York: Free Press; 1995 [1912]:.
21. Faris E.Review of Mind, Self, and Society.American Journal of Sociology. 1936;41:909-913.
22. Fine GA.The sad demise, mysterious disappearance, and glorious triumph of symbolic interactionism.Annual Review of Sociology. 1993;19:61-87.
23. Fisher B,Strauss A.The Chicago tradition and social change: Thomas, Park and their successors.Symbolic Interaction. 1978;1 (2): 5-23.
24. Fisher B,Strauss A.George Herbert Mead and the Chicago tradition of sociology.Symbolic Interaction. 1979;2 (1): 9-26.
25. Gehlen AMan: His Nature and Place in the World. New York: Columbia University Press; 1988 [1950]:.
26. Goffman EFrame Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1974:.
27. A Historian Reads Max Weber: Essays on the Protestant Ethic. Gosh P, ed. Wiesbaden: HarrassowitzVerlag; 2008:.
28. Habermas J.A philosophico-political profile.New Left Review. 1985;151:76-77.
29. Habermas JThe Theory of Communicative Action: Volume 2. Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason. Cambridge: Polity; 1987 [1981]:.
30. Honneth A,Joas HSocial Action and Human Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1988:.
31. How AR.The author, the text and the canon.Journal of Classical Sociology. 2007;7 (1): 5-22.
32. Jauss H-R.Literary history as a challenge to literary theory.New Literary History. 1970;2 (1): 7-37.
33. Joas HSocial Theory Today. Giddens ATurner J, ed. Cambridge: Polity; 1987:82-115.
34. Joas HPragmatism and Social Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1993:.
35. Joas HThe Creativity of Action. Cambridge: Polity; 1996 [1992]:.
36. Joas H,Knobl WSocial Theory: Twenty Introductory Lectures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010:.
37. Lamont M.How to become a dominant French philosopher: The case of Jacques Derrida.American Journal of Sociology. 1988;93 (3): 584-622.
38. Lewis JDPhilosophy, Social Theory and the Thought of George Herbert Mead. Aboulafia M, ed. Albany: SUNY Press; 1981:109-135.
39. Lewis JD,Smith RLAmerican Sociology and Pragmatism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1980:.
40. Luhmann NSocial Systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 1995 [1984]:.
41. McPhail C,Rexroat C.Mead vs Blumer: The divergent methodological perspectives of social behaviorism and symbolic interactionism.American Sociological Review. 1979;44 (3): 449-467.
42. Mead GHMind, Self, and Society: From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist. Morris C, ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1934:.
43. Mead GHEssays in Social Psychology. Deegan MJ, ed. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction; 2001:.
44. Menand LThe Metaphysical Club: A Story of Ideas in America. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux; 2001:.
45. Merton RKSocial Theory and Social Structure. New York: Free Press; 1968:.
46. Mills CW.The professional ideology of social pathologists.American Journal of Sociology. 1942;49 (2): 165-180.
47. Mills CWThe Sociological Imagination. London: Oxford University Press; 1959:.
48. Morrione TGeorge Herbert Mead and Human Conduct. Blumer H, ed. CA: AltaMira; 2004:.
49. Morris CWMind, Self, and Society: From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist. Mead GHMorris C, ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1934:v-xxxvi.
50. Morris CWThe Pragmatic Movement in American Philosophy. New York: George Braziller; 1970:.
51. Orbach H.The genesis of Mind, Self, and Society: Mead's social psychology and Charles Morris' presentation of it. Paper presented at the Society for the Study of Symbolic Interaction Annual Meeting; 1983 Detroit; 1983.
52. Orgel S.What is a text?.Research Opportunities in Renaissance Drama. 1981;26:3-6.
53. Parker D.Why bother with Durkheim? Teaching sociology in the 1990s.Sociological Review. 1997;45 (1): 122-146.
54. Parsons TThe Structure of Social Action: A Study in Social Theory with Special Reference to a Group of Recent European Writers. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1937:.
55. Reed I,Alexander JC.Social science as reading and performance: A cultural-sociological understanding of epistemology.European Journal of Social Theory. 2009;12 (1): 21-41.
56. Ricoeur PHermeneutics and the Human Sciences: Essays on Language, Action and Interpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1981:.
57. Riesman DAbundance for What?. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction; 1993 1955:418-441.
58. Ritzer GSociological Theory. Oxford: Blackwell; 2010:.
59. Seidman SContested Knowledge: Social Theory Today. Oxford: Blackwell; 2008:.
60. Shalin D.Pragmatism and social interactionism.American Sociological Review. 1986;51 (1): 9-29.
61. Sherman LW.Uses of the masters.The American Sociologist. 1974;9 (4): 176-181.
62. Silva FCMead and Modernity: Science, Selfhood and Democratic Politics. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books; 2008:.
63. Skinner Q.Meaning and understanding in the history of ideas.History and Theory. 1969;8 (1): 3-52.
64. Tucker C.Herbert Blumer: A pilgrimage with pragmatism.Symbolic Interaction. 1988;11 (1): 99-124.
65. Tugendhat EPhilosophy, Social Theory and the Thought of George Herbert Mead. Aboulafia M, ed. New York: SUNY Press; 1991:169-200.
66. The New Blackwell Companion to Social Theory. Turner BS, ed. Oxford: Blackwell; 2008:.
67. Vieira MBThe Elements of Representation in Hobbes: Aesthetics, Theatre, Law, and Theology in the Construction of Hobbes's Theory of the State. Leiden: Brill; 2009:.
68. Waples D.The Graduate Library School at Chicago.The Library Quarterly. 1931;1 (1): 26-36.
69. Webb RKThe British Working Class Reader, 1790-1848. New York: George Allen & Unwin; 1955:.
70. Woelfel J.Comment on the Blumer-Bales dialogue concerning the interpretation of Mead's thought.American Journal of Sociology. 1967;72 (4): 409.
71. Wolin S.Max Weber: Legitimation, method, and the politics of theory.Political Theory. 1981;9 (3): 401-424.
72. Zerubavel EHidden Rhythms. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1981:.