Pontine and thalamic influences on fluid rewards: III. Anticipatory contrast for sucrose and corn oil

Physiology and Behavior

Volumn 105, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 595-606

  Liang, Nu Chu ^a   Norgren, Ralph ^a   Grigson, Patricia S ^a  

^a PENN STATE COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Anticipatory contrast effect; Orosensory stimulation; Parabrachial nucleus; Sham feeding; Thalamic orosensory area

Indexed keywords

CORN OIL; IBOTENIC ACID; SUCROSE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BRAIN STEM INJURY; CONTROLLED STUDY; MALE; NONHUMAN; PARABRACHIAL NUCLEUS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; SHAM FEEDING; SPRAGUE DAWLEY RAT; TASTE; THALAMUS;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CONDITIONING, OPERANT; CORN OIL; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; DRINKING BEHAVIOR; FOOD PREFERENCES; MALE; MOTIVATION; PONS; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; REACTION TIME; REWARD; SACCHARIN; SUCROSE; SWEETENING AGENTS; THALAMUS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 82155185271     PISSN: 00319384     EISSN: 1873507X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.06.008     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Liang N.C., Freet C.S., Grigson P.S., Norgren R. Pontine and thalamic influences on fluid rewards: I. Operant responding for sucrose and corn oil. Physiol Beahv 2011.
2. Liang N.C., Norgren R., Grigson P.S. Lesions of the parabrachial nuclei, but not the orosensory thalamus, disrupt operant responding for sucrose and corn oil in rats. in abstract 197.20 2008, Society for Neuroscience, Washington, DC.
3. Liang N.-C., Grigson P.S., Norgren R. Pontine and thalamic influences on fluid rewards: II. Sucrose and corn oil conditioned aversion. Physiol Beahv 2011.
4. Flaherty C.F. Incentive relativity 1996, Cambridge Univ. Press, New York.
5. Flaherty C.F., Cheke S. Anticipation of incentive gain. Anim Learn Behav 1982, 10(2):177-182.
6. Lucas G.A., Gawley D.J., Timberlake W. Anticipatory contrast as a measure of time horizons in the rats: some methodological determinants. Anim Learn Behav 1988, 16(4):377-382.
7. Lucas G.A., Timberlake W. Negative anticipatory contrast and preference conditioning: flavor cues support preference conditioning, and environmental cues support contrast. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 1992, 18(1):34-40.
8. Flaherty C.F., Turovsky J., Krauss K.L. Relative hedonic value modulates anticipatory contrast. Physiol Behav 1994, 55(6):1047-1054.
9. Flaherty C.F., Rowan G.A. Anticipatory contrast: within-subjects analysis. Anim Learn Behav 1985, 13:2-5.
10. Flaherty C.F., Coppotelli C., Grigson P.S., Mitchell C., Flaherty J.E. Investigation of the devaluation interpretation of anticipatory negative contrast. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 1995, 21(3):229-247.
11. Timberlake W., Engle M. Decremental carryover effects of sucrose ingestion in the negative anticipatory contrast procedure in rats. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 1995, 21(4):304-317.
12. Flaherty C.F., Grigson P.S., Cheke S., Hnat K. Deprivation state and temporal horizons in anticipatory contrast. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 1991, 17(4):503-518.
13. Flaherty C.F., Rowan G.A. Successive, simultaneous, and anticipatory contrast in the consumption of saccharin solutions. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 1986, 12(4):381-393.
14. Weatherford S.C., Greenberg D., Gibbs J., Smith G.P. The potency of D-1 and D-2 receptor antagonists is inversely related to the reward value of sham-fed corn oil and sucrose in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1990, 37(2):317-323.
15. Liang N.C., Hajnal A., Norgren R. Sham feeding corn oil increases accumbens dopamine in the rat. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2006, 291(5):R1236-R1239.
16. Hajnal A., Smith G.P., Norgren R. Oral sucrose stimulation increases accumbens dopamine in the rat. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2004, 286(1):R31-R37.
17. Smith G.P. Sham feeding in rats with chronic, reversible gastric fistulas. Current protocols in neuroscience 1999, 1-6. Wiley, New York.
18. Booth D.A. Conditioned satiety in the rat. J Comp Physiol Psychol 1972, 81(3):457-471.
19. Sclafani A., Nissenbaum J.W. Is gastric sham feeding really sham feeding?. Am J Physiol 1985, 248(3 Pt 2):R387-R390.
20. Waite P. Trigeminal sensory system. The rat nervous system 2004, 817-851. Academic Press, San Diego. G. Paxinos (Ed.).
21. Jongen-Relo A.L., Feldon J. Specific neuronal protein: a new tool for histological evaluation of excitotoxic lesions. Physiol Behav 2002, 76(4-5):449-456.
22. Mungarndee S.S., Lundy R.F., Norgren R. Expression of Fos during sham sucrose intake in rats with central gustatory lesions. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2008, 295(3):R751-R763.
23. Reilly S., Bornovalova M., Trifunovic R. Excitotoxic lesions of the gustatory thalamus spare simultaneous contrast effects but eliminate anticipatory negative contrast: evidence against a memory deficit. Behav Neurosci 2004, 118(2):365-376.
24. Reilly S., Pritchard T.C. Gustatory thalamus lesions in the rat: II. Aversive and appetitive taste conditioning. Behav Neurosci 1996, 110(4):746-759.
25. Schroy P.L., Wheeler R.A., Davidson C., Scalera G., Twining R.C., Grigson P.S. Role of gustatory thalamus in anticipation and comparison of rewards over time in rats. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2005, 288(4):R966-R980.
26. Sclafani A., Azzara A.V., Touzani K., Grigson P.S., Norgren R. Parabrachial nucleus lesions block taste and attenuate flavor preference and aversion conditioning in rats. Behav Neurosci 2001, 115(4):920-933.
27. Flynn F.W., Grill H.J., Schulkin J., Norgren R. Central gustatory lesions: II. Effects on sodium appetite, taste aversion learning, and feeding behaviors. Behav Neurosci 1991, 105(6):944-954.
28. Reilly S., Trifunovic R. Progressive ratio performance in rats with gustatory thalamus lesions. Behav Neurosci 1999, 113(5):1008-1019.
29. Reilly S., Trifunovic R. Gustatory thalamus lesions eliminate successive negative contrast in rats: evidence against a memory deficit. Behav Neurosci 2003, 117(3):606-615.
30. Nomura T., Ogawa H. The taste and mechanical response properties of neurons in the parvicellular part of the thalamic posteromedial ventral nucleus of the rat. Neurosci Res 1985, 3(2):91-105.
31. Norgren R., Leonard C.M. Ascending central gustatory pathways. J Comp Neurol 1973, 150(2):217-237.
32. Norgren R., Wolf G. Projections of thalamic gustatory and lingual areas in the rat. Brain Res 1975, 92(1):123-129.
33. Ogawa H., Hayama T., Ito S. Response properties of the parabrachio-thalamic taste and mechanoreceptive neurons in rats. Exp Brain Res 1987, 68(3):449-457.
34. Lundy R., Norgren R. Gustatory system. The rat nervous system 2004, 891-921. Academic, New York. G. Paxinos (Ed.).
35. Emmers R. Synaptic relationships between the ascending trigeminal fibers and the third order lingual relay neurons of the rat thalamus. Exp Neurol 1975, 48(3 Pt 1):586-594.
36. Emmers R., Benjamin R.M., Blomquist A.J. Thalamic localization of afferents from the tongue in albino rat. J Comp Neurol 1962, 118:43-48.
37. Kosar E., Grill H.J., Norgren R. Gustatory cortex in the rat. II. Thalamocortical projections. Brain Res 1986, 379(2):342-352.
38. Kosar E., Grill H.J., Norgren R. Gustatory cortex in the rat. I. Physiological properties and cytoarchitecture. Brain Res 1986, 379(2):329-341.
39. Geddes R.I., Han L., Baldwin A.E., Norgren R., Grigson P.S. Gustatory insular cortex lesions disrupt drug-induced, but not lithium chloride-induced, suppression of conditioned stimulus intake. Behav Neurosci 2008, 122(5):1038-1050.
40. Jadhav S.P., Feldman D.E. Texture coding in the whisker system. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2010, 20(3):313-318.
41. Pfaffmann C., Norgren R., Grill H.J. Sensory affect and motivation. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1977, 290:18-34.
42. Shimura T., Norgren R., Grigson P.S. Brainstem lesions and gustatory function: I. The role of the nucleus of the solitary tract during a brief intake test in rats. Behav Neurosci 1997, 111(1):155-168.
43. Reilly S., Grigson P.S., Norgren R. Parabrachial nucleus lesions and conditioned taste aversion: evidence supporting an associative deficit. Behav Neurosci 1993, 107(6):1005-1017.
44. Spector A.C. Gustatory function in the parabrachial nuclei: implications from lesion studies in rats. Rev Neurosci 1995, 6(2):143-175.
45. Spector A.C., Grill H.J., Norgren R. Concentration-dependent licking of sucrose and sodium chloride in rats with parabrachial gustatory lesions. Physiol Behav 1993, 53(2):277-283.
46. Grigson P.S., Reilly S., Shimura T., Norgren R. Ibotenic acid lesions of the parabrachial nucleus and conditioned taste aversion: further evidence for an associative deficit in rats. Behav Neurosci 1998, 112(1):160-171.
47. Spector A.C., Norgren R., Grill H.J. Parabrachial gustatory lesions impair taste aversion learning in rats. Behav Neurosci 1992, 106(1):147-161.
48. Di Lorenzo P. Long-delay learning in rats with parabrachial pontine lesions. Chem Senses 1988, 13(2).
49. Norgren R., Li B., Tesche J., Grigson P.S. Learned aversions to corn oil in rats with lesions of the parabrachial nuclei. Benjamin Franklin/Lafayette Seminar: LaNapoule, France 1999.
50. Salamone J.D., Correa M., Mingote S., Weber S.M. Nucleus accumbens dopamine and the regulation of effort in food-seeking behavior: implications for studies of natural motivation, psychiatry, and drug abuse. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2003, 305(1):1-8.
51. Salamone J.D., Wisniecki A., Carlson B.B., Correa M. Nucleus accumbens dopamine depletions make animals highly sensitive to high fixed ratio requirements but do not impair primary food reinforcement. Neuroscience 2001, 105(4):863-870.
52. Grigson P.S., Hajnal A. Once is too much: conditioned changes in accumbens dopamine following a single saccharin-morphine pairing. Behav Neurosci 2007, 121(6):1234-1242.
53. Genn R.F., Ahn S., Phillips A.G. Attenuated dopamine efflux in the rat nucleus accumbens during successive negative contrast. Behav Neurosci 2004, 118(4):869-873.