Priming and the Obama effect on public evaluations of the United States

Political Psychology

Volumn 32, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 989-1006

  Dragojlovic, Nicolas Isak ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Anti Americanism; Canada; Obama; Political awareness; Priming

Indexed keywords

EID: 82155175471     PISSN: 0162895X     EISSN: 14679221     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2011.00849.x     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Ai, C., & Norton, E. C. (2003). Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Economics Letters, 80(1), 123-129.
2. Brambor, T., Clark, W. R., & Golder, M. (2006). Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analysis. Political Analysis, 14(1), 63-82.
3. Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007). Framing public opinion in competitive democracies. American Political Science Review, 101(4), 637-656.
4. Datta, M. (2008). Anti-Americanism and support for the U.S.-led war in Iraq. Presented at the annual meeting of the Western Political Science Association, San Diego.
5. Datta, M. (2009). The decline of American soft power in the United Nations. International Studies Perspectives, 10(3), 266-285.
6. Decoster, J., & Claypool, H. M. (2004). A meta-analysis of priming effects on impression formation supporting a general model of informational biases. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(1), 2-27.
7. Druckman, J. N. (2004). Priming the vote: Campaign effects in a U.S. Senate election. Political Psychology, 25(4), 577-594.
8. Druckman, J. N., & Holmes, J. W. (2004). Does presidential rhetoric matter? Priming and presidential approval. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 34(4), 755-778.
9. Druckman, J. N., Jacobs, L. R., & Ostermeier, E. (2004). Candidate strategies to prime issues and image. Journal of Politics, 66(4), 1180-1202.
10. Druckman, J. N., & Kam, C. K. (2011). Students as experimental participants: A defense of the "narrow data base." In J. N. Druckman, D. P. Green, J. H. Kuklinski, & A. Lupia (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of experimental political science (pp. 41-57). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Farnsworth, S., Soroka, S., & Young, L. (2010). The international two-step flow in foreign news: Canadian and U.S. television news coverage of U.S. affairs. The International Journal of Press Politics, 15(4), 401-419.
12. Gartner, S. S. (2008). The multiple effects of casualties on public support for war: An experimental approach. American Political Science Review, 102(1), 95-106.
13. Goldsmith, B. E., & Horiuchi, Y. (2009). Spinning the globe? U.S. public diplomacy and foreign public opinion. Journal of Politics, 71(3), 863-875.
14. Goldsmith, B. E., & Horiuchi, Y. (2010). In search of soft power: Does foreign public opinion matter for U.S. foreign policy? Sydney: University of Sydney and The Australian National University.
15. Isernia, P. (2007). Anti-Americanism in Europe during the Cold War. In P. Katzenstein & R. Keohane (Eds.), Anti-Americanisms in world politics (pp. 57-92). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
16. Johnston, A. I., & Stockmann, D. (2007). Chinese attitudes toward the United States and Americans. In P. J. Katzenstein & R. O. Keohane (Eds.), Anti-Americanisms in world politics (pp. 157-195). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
17. Katzenstein, P. J., & Keohane, R. O. (2007). The political consequences of anti-Americanism. In P. J. Katzenstein & R. O. Keohane (Eds.), Anti-Americanisms in world politics (pp. 273-305). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
18. King, G., Tomz, M., & Wittenberg, J. (2000). Making the most of statistical analyses: Improving interpretation and presentation. American Journal of Political Science, 44(2), 341-355.
19. Kohut, A., Wike, R., Carriere-Kretschmer, E., & Holzwart, K. (2008). Global public opinion the Bush years (2001-2008): America's image, Muslims and Westerners, global economy, rise of China. Washington, DC: The Pew Global Attitudes Project, Pew Research Center.
20. Kohut, A., Wike, R., Carriere-Kretschmer, E., Holzwart, K., & Poushter, J. (2009). Most Muslim publics not so easily moved: Confidence in Obama lifts U.S. image around the world. 25-nation Pew Global Attitudes Survey. Washington, DC: The Pew Global Attitudes Project.
21. Krosnick, J. A., & Brannon, L. A. (1993). The impact of the Gulf War on the ingredients of presidential evaluations: Multidimensional effects of political involvement. American Political Science Review, 87(4), 963-975.
22. Lynch, M. (2007). Anti-Americanisms in the Arab world. In P. J. Katzenstein & R. O. Keohane (Eds.), Anti-Americanisms in world politics (pp. 196-226). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
23. Miller, J. M., & Krosnick, J. A. (2000). News media impact on the ingredients of presidential evaluations: Politically knowledgeable citizens are guided by a trusted source. American Journal of Political Science, 44(2), 301-315.
24. Mintz, A., Redd, S. B., & Vedlitz, A. (2006). Can we generalize from student experiments to the real world in political science, military affairs, and international relations? Journal of Conflict Resolution, 50(5), 757-776.
25. Nelson, T. E., Oxley, Z. M., & Clawson, R. A. (1997). Toward a psychology of framing effects. Political Behavior, 19(3), 221-246.
26. Nisbet, E. C., Nisbet, M. C., Scheufele, D. A., & Shanahan, J. E. (2004). Public diplomacy, television news, and Muslim opinion. Press/Politics, 9(2), 11-37.
27. Nossal, K. R. (2005). Anti-Americanism in Canada. Budapest, Hungary: Center for Policy Studies, Central European University.
28. Nye, J. (2004). Soft power: The means to success in world politics. New York: Public Affairs.
29. Petty, R. E., DeMarree, K. G., Brinol, P., Horcajo, J., & Strathman, A. J. (2008). Need for cognition can magnify or attenuate priming effects in social judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(7), 900-912.
30. Schatz, E., & Levine, R. (2010). Framing, public diplomacy, and anti-Americanism in Central Asia. International Studies Quarterly, 54(3), 855-869.
31. Scheufele, D. A., & Tewksbury, D. (2007). Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 9-20.
32. Tomz, M., Wittenberg, J., & King, G. (2001). Clarify: Software for interpreting and presenting statistical results. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University. 〈〉.
33. Zaller, J., & Feldman, S. (1992). Theory of the survey response: Answering questions versus revealing preferences. American Journal of Political Science, 36(3), 579-616.
34. Zaller, J. R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.