Minimally invasive lumbar fusion

Seminars in Spine Surgery

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 235-241

  Schoenfeld, Andrew J ^a  

^a Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso   (United States)

Author keywords

Lumbar fusion; Minimally invasive surgery

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DEGENERATION; LAMINECTOMY; LENGTH OF STAY; LUMBAR FUSION; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; MORBIDITY; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSEUDARTHROSIS; SPINE FUSION; SPINE INJURY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; VERTEBRAL CANAL STENOSIS;

EID: 82155166219     PISSN: 10407383     EISSN: 15584496     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/j.semss.2011.05.004     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Oppenheimer J.H., DeCastro I., McDonnell D.E. Minimally invasive spine technology and minimally invasive spine surgery: A historical review. Neurosurg Focus 2009, 27:E9.
2. Foley K.T., Gupta S.K., Justis J.R., et al. Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation of the lumbar spine. Neurosurg Focus 2001, 10:E4.
3. Fourney D.R., Dettori J.R., Norvell D.C., et al. Does minimal access tubular assisted spine surgery increase or decrease complications in spinal decompression or fusion?. Spine 2010, 35:S57-S65.
4. Smith W.D., Anson J.A., Kaplan S.S., et al. XLIF corpectomy. Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF) 2008, 259-274. Quality Medical Publishing, St Louis, MO. J.A. Goodrich, I.J. Volcan (Eds.).
5. Villavicencio A.T., Burneikiene S., Roeca C.M., et al. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Surg Neurol Int 2010, 1:12.
6. Ntoukas V., Muller A. Minimally invasive approach versus traditional open approach for one level posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Minim Invas Neurosurg 2010, 53:21-24.
7. Schwender J.D., Holly L.T., Rouben D.P., et al. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): Technical feasibility and initial results. J Spinal Disord Tech 2005, 18(suppl 1):S1-S6.
8. Epstein N.E. How often is minimally invasive minimally effective: What are the complication rates for minimally invasive surgery?. Surg Neurol 2008, 70:386-389.
9. Wu R.H., Fraser J.F., Hartl R. Minimal access versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: Meta-analysis of fusion rates. Spine 2010, 35:2273-2281.
10. Harris E.B., Massey P., Lawrence J., et al. Percutaneous techniques for minimally invasive posterior lumbar fusion. Neurosurg Focus 2008, 25:E12.
11. Isaacs R.F., Podichetty V.K., Santiago P., et al. Minimally invasive microendoscopy-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with instrumentation. J Neurosurg Spine 2005, 3:98-105.
12. Kim J.S., Kang B.U., Lee S.H., et al. Mini-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion augmented by percutaneous pedicle screw fixation: A comparison of surgical outcomes in adult low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis. J Spinal Disord Tech 2009, 22:114-121.
13. Park P., Foley K.T. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with reduction of spondylolisthesis: Technique and outcomes after a minimum of 2 years' follow-up. Neurosurg Focus 2008, 25:E16.
14. Scheufler K.M., Dohmen H., Vougioukas V.I. Percutaneous transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar instability. Neurosurgery 2007, 60(ONS suppl 2):ONS203-ONS213.
15. Goodrich J.A., Volcan I.J., Schaffa T.D., et al. Basic concepts: Applied anatomy of extreme lateral interbody fusion. Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF) 2008, 17-30. Quality Medical Publishing, St Louis, MO. J.A. Goodrich, I.J. Volcan (Eds.).
16. Knight R.Q., Schwaegler P., Hanscom D., et al. Direct lateral lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative conditions: Early complication profile. J Spinal Disord Tech 2009, 22:34-37.
17. Ozgur B.M., Aryan H.E., Pimenta L., et al. Extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF): A novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J 2006, 6:435-443.
18. Aryan H.E., Newman C.B., Gold J.J., et al. Percutaneous axial lumbar interbody fusion (AxiaLIF) of the L5-S1 segment: Initial clinical and radiographic experience. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2008, 51:225-230.
19. Rosen D.S., Ferguson S.D., Ogden A.T., et al. Obesity and self-reported outcome after minimally invasive lumbar spinal fusion surgery. Neurosurgery 2008, 63:956-960.
20. Arts M.P., Brand R., van den Akker M.E., et al. Tubular discectomy vs conventional microdiskectomy for sciatica: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2009, 302:149-158.