Mobile phones are a viable option for surveying young Australian women: A comparison of two telephone survey methods

BMC Medical Research Methodology

Volumn 11, Issue , 2011, Pages

  Liu, Bette ^a   Brotherton, Julia M L ^b   Shellard, David ^c   Donovan, Basil ^a,d   Saville, Marion ^b   Kaldor, John M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^b VICTORIAN CYTOLOGY SERVICE   (Australia)

^c Hunter Valley Research Foundation   (Australia)

^d SYDNEY EYE HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

Cellular phone; HPV vaccine; mobile phone; survey methods; telephone surveys

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MOBILE PHONE; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICS; TELEPHONE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AUSTRALIA; CELLULAR PHONE; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEYS; HUMANS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TELEPHONE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 82055163960     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712288     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-159     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Sex in Australia: The rationale and methods of the Australian Study of Health and Relationships. Smith A, Rissel C, Richters J, et al. Aust N Z J Public Health 2003 27 106 17 10.1111/j.1467-842X.2003.tb00797.x 14696700 (Pubitemid 36526881)
2. The NSW Health Survey Program: Overview and methods, 1996-2000. Williamson M, Baker D, Jorm L, Sydney: Department of Health 2001
3. Communications Reports. Australian Communications and Media Authority, http://www.acma.gov.au/WEB/STANDARD/pc=PC-100897
4. How do we reach them? Comparing random samples from mobile and landline phones. Steffens P, Tonelli M, Davidsson P, Proceedings of AGSE Entrepreneurship Research Exchange Melbourne: Swinburne University of Technology 2011
5. Sampling and coverage issues of telephone surveys used for collecting health information in Australia: results from a face-to-face survey from 1999 to 2008. Dal Grande E, Taylor A, BMC Med Res Methodol 2010 10 77 10.1186/1471-2288-10-77 20738884
6. The Consumer Experience 2010. Ofcom, 2010 http://stakeholders.ofcom.org. uk/binaries/research/consumer-experience/tce-10/consumer-esperience-10.pdf
7. Bias in telephone surveys that do not sample cell phones. Thiede K, Davern M, Boudreauz M, et al. Med Care 2011 49 355 364 21407032
8. Acceptance of Human Papillomavirus Vaccination among Californian parents of daughters: a representative statewide analysis. Constantine N, Jerman P, J Adolesc Health 2007 40 2 108 15 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.10.007 17259050 (Pubitemid 46149373)
9. Secondary students and sexual health 2008, Monograph Series No. 70. Smith A, Aguis P, Mitchell A, et al. Melbourne: Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society, La Trobe University 2009
10. 2009 Adult vaccination survey: summary results. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Canberra: AIHW Cat. no. PHE 135. 2011
11. Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2011 http://www.abs.gov.au/cdataonline
12. Profiling the 'mobile phone only' population. Results from a dual-frame telephone survey using a landline and mobile sampling frame. Pennay D, ACSPRI Social Science Methodology Conference, 2010 http://www.srcentre.com.au/pdf/2010/ Dual-frame%20survey-ACSPRI%20conference%20paper-Finalv2.pdf
13. Feasibility of including cellular telephone numbers in random digit dialing for epidemiologic case-control studies. Voigt L, Schwartz S, Doody D, et al. Am J Epidemiol 2010 173 1 118 126 21071602
14. Rural, Regional and Remote Health: A guide to remoteness classifications. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Canberra: AIHW Catalogue PHE 53 2004