Outcome based state budget allocation for diabetes prevention programs using multi-criteria optimization with robust weights

Health Care Management Science

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 324-337

  Mehrotra, Sanjay ^a   Kim, Kibaek ^a  

^a Northwestern University   (United States)

Author keywords

Budget allocation; Diabetes; Multi objective optimization; Robust optimization

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BUDGET; COMORBIDITY; DIABETES MELLITUS; ECONOMICS; ETHNOLOGY; HEALTH CARE DISPARITY; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MORTALITY; PREVALENCE; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS; UNITED STATES;

BUDGETS; COMORBIDITY; DIABETES MELLITUS; HEALTH CARE RATIONING; HEALTH PROMOTION; HEALTHCARE DISPARITIES; HUMANS; MODELS, ECONOMETRIC; PREVALENCE; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 81955168076     PISSN: 13869620     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10729-011-9166-7     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: Hcupnet. http://hcupnet. ahrq. gov/. Accessed 9 May 2010.
2. Al MJ, Feenstra TL, van Hout BA (2005) Optimal allocation of resources over health care programmes: dealing with decreasing marginal utility and uncertainty. Health Econ 14: 655-667.
3. Baltes BB, Dickson MW, Sherman MP, Bauer CC, LaGanke JS (2002) Computer-mediated communication and group decision making: a meta-analysis. Organ Behav Human Decis Process 87(1): 156-179.
4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral risk factor surveillance system. http://www. cdc. gov/BRFSS/. Accessed 9 May 2010.
5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC WONDER. http://wonder. cdc. gov/. Accessed 9 May 2010.
6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Diabetes data and trends. http://apps. nccd. cdc. gov/DDTSTRS/default. aspx. Accessed 9 May 2010.
7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Financial management office. http://www. cdc. gov/fmo/index. html. Accessed 11 May 2010.
8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2008) National diabetes fact sheet: general information and national estimates on diabetes in the United States, 2007. U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
9. Dempe S, Lohse S (2006) Recent advances in optimization, chap. inverse linear programming. Springer, Berlin, pp 19-28.
10. Earnshaw SR, Dennett SL (2003) Integer/linear mathematical programming models-a tool for allocating healthcare resources. Pharmacoeconomics 21: 839-851.
11. Earnshaw SR, Hicks K, Richter A, Honeycutt1 A (2007) A linear programming model for allocating hiv prevention funds with state agencies: a pilot study. Health Care Manag Sci 10(3): 239-252.
12. Earnshaw SR, Richter A, Sorensen SW, Hoerger TJ, Hicks KA, Engelgau M, Thompson T, Narayan KMV, Williamson DF, Gregg E, Zhang P (2002) Optimal allocation of resources across four interventions for type 2 diabetes. Med Decis Mak 22: S80-S91.
13. Hatcher L (1994) A step-by-step approach to using the SAS system for factor analysis and structural equation modeling, 1st edn. SAS Publishing.
14. Heron M (2010) Deaths: leading causes for 2006. National vital statistics reports, vol 58(14). National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD.
15. Hu J, Mehrotra S (2011) Robust and stochastically weighted multi-objective optimization models and reformulations. Working paper, IEMS Department, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208. Available from: http://www. optimization-online. org/DB_HTML/2010/10/2762. html.
16. Illinois Department of Human Services. Diabetes Prevention & Control Program (DPCP). http://www. dhs. state. il. us/page. aspx?item=33873. Accessed 25 April 2010.
17. Jolliffe I (2002) Principal component analysis, 2nd edn. Springer series in statistics.
18. Martin M, Larsen BA, Shea L, Hutchins D, Alfaro-Correa A (2007) State diabetes prevention and control program participation in the health disparities collaborative: evaluating the first 5 years. Preventing Chronic Disease 4(1). Available from: http://www. cdc. gov/pcd/issues/2007/jan/06_0027. htm.
19. Nackel JG, Goldman J, Fairman WL (1978) A group decision process for resource allocation in the health setting. Manage Sci 24(12): 1259-1267.
20. Petrou S, Wolstenholme J (2000) A review of alternative approaches to healthcare resource allocation. Pharmacoeconomics 18: 33-43.
21. Satterfield DW, Murphy D, Essien JDK, Hosey G, Stankus M, Hoffman P, Beartusk K, Mitchell PL, Alfaro-Correa A (2004) Using the essential public health services as strategic leverage to strengthen the public health response to diabetes. Public Health Rep 119: 311-321.
22. Schoemaker PJ, Waid CC (1982) An experimental comparison of different approaches to determining weights in additive utility models. Manage Sci 28(2): 182-196.
23. Sion M (1958) On general minimax theorems. Pac J Math 8: 171-176.
24. Stinnett AA, Paltiel AD (1996) Mathematical programming for the efficient allocation of health care resources. J Health Econ 15(5): 641-653.
25. Triantaphyllou E, Sánchez A (1997) A sensitivity analysis approach for some deterministic multi-criteria decision making methods. Decis Sci 28: 151-194.
26. Triantaphyllou E, Shu B, Sanchez SN, Ray T (1998) Multi-criteria decision making: an operations research approach. Encyc Electr Electron Eng 15: 175-186.
27. Tsiporkovaa E, Boeva V (2006) Multi-step ranking of alternatives in a multi-criteria and multi-expert decision making environment. Inf Sci 176(18): 2673-2697.
28. U. S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy people 2010. http://www. healthypeople. gov/. Accessed 28 April 2010.
29. U. S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy people 2010, 2nd edn. With understanding and improving health and objectives for improving health, vol 2. U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC (2000).
30. Zhang J, Liu Z (1996) Calculating some inverse linear programming problems. J Comput Appl Math 72(2): 261-273.