Logistics tool selection with two-phase fuzzy multi criteria decision making: A case study for personal digital assistant selection

Expert Systems with Applications

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 142-153

  Büyüközkan, Gülçin ^a   Arsenyan, Jbid ^b   Ruan, Da ^c  

^a GALATASARAY UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b BAHCESEHIR UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^c BELGIAN NUCLEAR RESEARCH CENTRE   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Fuzzy AHP; Fuzzy axiomatic design; Fuzzy TOPSIS; Group decision making; Logistics industry; Logistics tool selection

Indexed keywords

AXIOMATIC DESIGN; FUZZY AHP; FUZZY TOPSIS; GROUP DECISION-MAKING; LOGISTICS INDUSTRY;

AIRFOILS; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANTS; PROBLEM SOLVING; RATING; SCANNING; SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT;

DECISION MAKING;

EID: 81855221665     PISSN: 09574174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.06.017     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Z. Ayag, and R. Ozdemir A combined fuzzy AHP-goal programming approach to assembly-line selection Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems 18 4 2007 345 362
2. W. Bei, S. Wang, and J. Hu An analysis of supplier selection in manufacturing supply chain management Service Systems and Service Management 2 2006 439 444
3. G. Buyukozkan, and D. Ruan Evaluation of software development projects using a fuzzy multi-criteria decision approach Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 77 5-6 2008 464 475
4. Cebi, S.; & Celik, M. (2007). Fuzzy axiomatic design approach for measuring of customer satisfaction level on Turkish container ports. In Proceeding of the international 11th IFAC symposium on computational economics and financial and industrial systems (pp. 221-226). Istanbul, Turkey.
5. Cebi, M.; & Celik, M. (2008). Ship machinery installation based on fuzzy information axiom: The case of compressed air system. In Proceedings of the 8th international FLINS conference on computational intelligence in decision and control. Madrid, Spain.
6. Cebi, M.; Celik, M.; Er, I.; & Kahraman, C. (2008). Structuring ship design project approval mechanism towards operator-system interfaces via fuzzy axiomatic design principles. In Proceedings of the 8th international FLINS conference on computational intelligence in decision and control (pp. 1111-1116). Madrid, Spain.
7. S. Cebi, and C. Kahraman Extension of axiomatic design principles under fuzzy environment Expert Systems with Applications 37 3 2010 2682 2689
8. S. Cebi, and C. Kahraman Indicator design for passenger car using fuzzy axiomatic design principles Expert Systems with Applications 37 9 2010 6470 6481
9. M. Celik A hybrid design methodology for structuring an integrated environmental management system (IE MS) for shipping business Journal of Environmental Management 90 3 2009 1469 1475
10. M. Celik, S. Cebi, C. Kahraman, and I. Er Application of axiomatic design and TOPSIS methodologies under fuzzy environment for proposing competitive strategies on Turkish container ports in maritime transportation network Expert Systems with Applications 36 3 2009 4541 4557
11. M. Celik, and I. Er Fuzzy axiomatic design extension for managing model selection paradigm in decision science Expert Systems with Applications 36 3 2009 6477 6484
12. M. Celik, C. Kahraman, S. Cebi, and I. Er Fuzzy axiomatic design-based performance evaluation model for docking facilities in shipbuilding industry: The case of Turkish shipyards Expert Systems with Applications 36 1 2009 599 615
13. E. Cevikcan, S. Cebi, and I. Kaya Fuzzy VIKOR and fuzzy axiomatic design versus to fuzzy TOPSIS: An application of candidate assessment Journal of Multiple-Valued Logic and Soft Computing 15 2009 181 208
14. I. Chamodrakas, D. Batis, and D. Martakos Supplier selection in electronic marketplaces using satisfying and fuzzy AHP Expert Systems with Applications 37 2010 490 498
15. C.-T. Chen Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment Fuzzy Sets and Systems 114 2000 1 9
16. L.-S. Chen, and C.-H. Cheng Selecting IS personnel use fuzzy GDSS based on metric distance method European Journal of Operational Research 160 2005 803 820
17. S. Chen, and C. Hwang Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications 1992 Springer-Verlag Berlin
18. J. Chen, D. Yen, and K. Chen The acceptance and diffusion of the innovative smart phone use: A case study of a delivery service company in logistics Information & Management 46 2009 241 248
19. K. Cicek, and M. Celik Selection of porous materials in marine system design: The case of heat exchanger aboard ships Materials and Design 30 2009 4260 4266
20. M. Dagdeviren, S. Yavuz, and N. Kilinc Weapon selection using the AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment Expert Systems with Applications 36 2009 8143 8151
21. E. Eraslan, D. Akay, and M. Kurt Usability ranking of intercity bus passenger seats using fuzzy axiomatic design theory Lecture Notes in Computer Science 410 2006 141 148
22. A. Goncalves-Coelho, and A. Mourao Axiomatic design as support for decision-making in a design for manufacturing context: A case study International Journal of Production Economics 109 2007 81 89
23. Harutunian, V.; Nordlund, M.; Tate, D.; & Suh, N. (1996). Decision making and software tools for product development based on axiomatic design theory. In The 1996 CIRP general assembly. Como, Italy.
24. F. Herrera, E. Herrera-Viedma, and F. Chiclana Multiperson decision-making based on multiplicative preference relations European Journal of Operational Research 129 2001 372 385
25. R. Hoffer Auditing PDA wireless devices in financial services EDPACS - The EDP audit, control, and security newsletter 33 2005 1 9
26. K.-C. Hung, P. Julian, T. Chien, and W.-H. Jin A decision support system for engineering design based on an enhanced fuzzy MCDM approach Expert Systems with Applications 37 2010 202 213
27. C. Hwang, and K. Yoon Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications 1981 Springer-Verlag New York
28. G. Iiklar, and G. Büyüközkan Using a multi-criteria decision making approach to evaluate mobile phone alternatives Computer Standards & Interfaces 29 2007 265 274
29. B.-S. Jang, Y.-S. Yang, Y.-S. Song, Y.-S. Yeun, and S.-H. Do Axiomatic design approach for marine design problems Marine Structures 15 2002 35 56
30. N. Jeong, Y. Yoo, and T.-Y. Heo Moderating effect of personal innovativeness on mobile-RFID services: Based on Warshaw's purchase intention model Technological Forecasting and Social Change 76 2009 154 164
31. C. Kahraman, and S. Cebi A new multi-attribute decision making method: Hierarchical fuzzy axiomatic design Expert Systems with Applications 36 3 2009 4848 4861
32. C. Kahraman, and O. Kulak Fuzzy multi-attribute decision making using an information axiom based approach Fuzzy multi-criteria decision making 2005 Springer New York, USA pp. 265-278
33. M. Kans An approach for determining the requirements of computerised maintenance management systems Computers in Industry 32-40 2008 59
34. O. Kulak A decision support system for fuzzy multi-attribute selection of material handling equipments Expert System with Application 29 2 2005 310 319
35. O. Kulak, M. Durmusoglu, and C. Kahraman Fuzzy multi-attribute equipment selection based on information axiom Journal of Materials Processing Technology 169 2005 337 345
36. O. Kulak, and C. Kahraman Fuzzy multi-attribute selection among transportation companies using axiomatic design and analytic hierarchy process Information Sciences 170 2005 191 210
37. C. Kwong, and H. Bai Determining the importance weights for the customer requirements in QFD using a fuzzy AHP with an extent analysis approach IIE Transactions 35 2003 619 626
38. C.-C. Lee, H. Cheng, and H.-H. Cheng An empirical study of mobile commerce in insurance industry: Task-technology fit and individual differences Decision Support Systems 43 2007 95 110
39. A.H.I. Lee A fuzzy supplier selection model with the consideration of benefits, opportunities, costs and risks Expert Systems with Applications 36 2009 2879 2893
40. D. Lehmann, and J. O'shaughnessy Decision criteria used in buying different categories of products Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management 18 1982 9 14
41. M. Lin, C. Wang, M. Chen, and C. Chang Using AHP and TOPSIS approaches in customer-driven product design process Computers in Industry 59 2008 17 31
42. C.-J. Lin, and W.-W. Wu A causal analytical method for group decision-making under fuzzy environment Expert Systems with Applications 34 2008 205 213
43. H.-T. Liu, and W.-K. Wang An integrated fuzzy approach for provider evaluation and selection in third-party logistics Expert Systems with Applications 36 2009 4387 4398
44. S.K. Madria, M. Mohania, S. Bhowmick, and B. Bhargava Mobile data and transaction management Information Sciences 141 2002 279 309
45. A. Martinez-Sala, E. Egea-Lopez, F. Garcia-Sanchez, and J. Garcia-Haro Tracking of returnable packaging and transport units with active RFID in the grocery supply chain Computers in Industry 60 2009 161 171
46. A. Masud, and A. Ravindran Multiple criteria decision making Operations research and management science handbook 2007 CRC Press Boca Raton, FL
47. P. Musilek, R. Guanlao, and G. Barreiro Genetic programming of fuzzy aggregation operations Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems 16 2 2005 107 118
48. B. Ozel, and B. Ozyoruk Supplier selection with fuzzy axiomatic design Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University 22 3 2007 415 423
49. J.-C. Pomerol, and S. Romero Multicriterion decision in management: Principles and practice 2000 Kluwer Academic Publishers Norwell
50. J. Qi, L. Li, Y. Li, and H. Shu An extension of technology acceptance model: Analysis of the adoption of mobile data services in China Systems Research and Behavioral Science 26 2009 391 507
51. M. Qureshi, P. Kumar, and D. Kumar 3PL evaluation and selection under a fuzzy environment: A case study The ICFAI Journal of Supply Chain Management 5 2008 38 53
52. G. Royes, R. Bastos, and G. Royes Applicants' selection applying a fuzzy multicriteria CBR methodology Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems 14 4 2003 167 180
53. T. Saaty The analytic hierarchy process 1980 McGraw Hill New York
54. A. Sanayei, S. Mousavi, and A. Yazdankhah Group decision making process for supplier selection with VIKOR under fuzzy environment Expert Systems with Applications 37 2010 24 30
55. H.-S. Shih Incremental analysis for MCDM with an application to group TOPSIS European Journal of Operational Research 186 2008 720 734
56. N. Suh The principles of design 1990 Oxford University Press New York
57. N. Suh Axiomatic design - advances applications 2001 Oxford University Press New York
58. M. Tam, and V. Tummala An application of the AHP in vendor selection of a telecommunications system Omega 29 2001 171 182
59. S. Wamba, L. Lefebvre, Y. Bendavid, and E. Lefebvre Exploring the impact of RFID technology and the EPC network on mobile B2B e-commerce: A case study in the retail industry International Journal of Production Economics 112 2008 614 629
60. Y.-M. Wang, and C. Parkan Optimal aggregation of fuzzy preference relations with an application to broadband internet service selection European Journal of Operational Research 187 2008 1476 1486
61. W.-Y. Wu, C. Lin, J.-Y. Kung, and C.-T. Lin A new fuzzy TOPSIS for fuzzy MADM problems under group decisions Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems 18 2 2007 109 115
62. J.-H. Wu, and S.-C. Wang What drives mobile commerce? An empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model Information & Management 42 2005 719 729
63. C.-H. Yeh, and Y.-H. Chang Modeling subjective evaluation for fuzzy group multicriteria decision making European Journal of Operational Research 194 2 2009 464 473
64. G. Yücel, and E. Aktas An evaluation methodology for ergonomic design of electronic consumer products based on fuzzy axiomatic design Journal of Multiple-Valued Logic and Soft Computing 14 3-5 2008 475 494
65. Zackariasson, P.; & Wilson, T. (2002). Technology, after sales service and organizations. In Association of marketing theory and practice (AMTP). Georgia, USA.
66. L. Zadeh The concept of a linguistic variable and its applications to approximate reasoning Information Sciences 1975 199-249 (I), 301-357 (II)