Continuity: Middle C- A very good place to start;La continuité: Le C du milieu - Un très bon point de départ

Canadian Family Physician

Volumn 57, Issue 11, 2011, Pages

  Kerr, Jonathan ^a,i   Walsh, Allyn E ^b,i   Konkin, Jill ^c,i   Tannenbaum, David ^d,e,i   Organek, Andrew J ^e,i   Parsons, Ean ^f,i   Saucier, Danielle ^g,i   Shaw, Elizabeth ^b,i   Oandasan, Ivy ^h  

^a QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^d MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^e UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^f MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY OF NEWFOUNDLAND   (Canada)

^g UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

^h Médecine Familiale Universitaire au Collège des Médecins de Famille   (Canada)

ⁱ Groupe de Travail Sur la Révision du Cursus Postdoctoral   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL SUPERVISION; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; EDUCATION PROGRAM; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FAMILY MEDICINE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; LIFELONG LEARNING; MEDICAL EDUCATION; PATIENT CARE; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; RESIDENCY EDUCATION; SHORT SURVEY;

CANADA; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CONTINUITY OF PATIENT CARE; FAMILY PRACTICE; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY;

EID: 81855220978     PISSN: 0008350X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Short Survey

References (13)

1. Tannenbaum D, Konkin J, Parsons E, Saucier D, Shaw L, Walsh A, et collab. Triple C competency-based curriculum. Report of the Working Group on Postgraduate Curriculum Review- part 1. Mississauga, ON: Collège des médecins de famille du Canada; 2011. Accessible à: www.cfpc.ca/uploadedFiles/ Education/-PDFs/WGCR-TripleC-Report-English-Final- 18Mar11. pdf. Accédé le 22 juillet 2011.
2. Oandasan I; Groupe de travail sur la révision du cursus postdoctoral. Advancing Canada's family medicine curriculum: Triple C. Can Fam Physician 2011;57:739-40 (ang), e237-8 (fr).
3. Kerr J, Walsh A, Konkin J, Tannenbaum D, Organek A, Parsons E, et collab. Renewing postgraduate family medicine education: the rationale for Triple-C. Can Fam Physician 2011;57:963-4 (ang), e311-12 (fr).
4. McWhinney IR. A textbook of family medicine. 2e éd. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1997.
5. Guthrie B, Wyke S. Personal continuity and access in UK general practice: a qualitative study of general practitioners' and patients' perceptions of when and how they matter. BMC Fam Pract 2006;24(7):11.
6. Darden PM, Ector W, Moran C, Quattlebaum TG. Comparison of continuity in a resident versus private practice. Pediatrics 2001;108(6):1263-8. (Pubitemid 33121467)
7. Ridd M, Shaw A, Salisbury C. 'Two sides of the coin'-the value of personal continuity to GPs: a qualitative interview study. Fam Pract 2006;23(4):461-8.
8. Saultz JW, Albedaiwi W. Interpersonal continuity of care and patient satisfaction: a critical review. Ann Fam Med 2004;2(5):445-51. (Pubitemid 39421114)
9. Gray DP, Evans P, Sweeney K, Lings P, Seamark D, Seamark C, et collab. Towards a theory of continuity of care. J R Soc Med 2003;96(4):160-6.
10. Hennen BK. Continuity of care in family practice. Part 1: dimensions of continuity. J Fam Pract 1975;2(5):371-2.
11. Hennen BK. Continuity of care. Dans: Shires DB, Hennen BK, Rice DI. Family medicine: a guidebook for practitioners of the art. 2e éd. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1987. p. 3-7.
12. Bernabeo EC, Holtman MC, Finsburg S, Rosenbaum JR, Holmboe ES. Lost in transition: the experience and impact of frequent changes in the inpatient learning environment. Acad Med 2011;86(5):591-8.
13. Hirsh DA, Ogur B, Thibault GE, Cox M. "Continuity" as an organizing principle for clinical education reform. N Engl J Med 2007;356(8):858-66. (Pubitemid 46294621)