Evaluating choreographies in BPMN 2.0 using an extended quality framework

Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing

Volumn 95 LNBIP, Issue , 2011, Pages 103-117

  Cortes Cornax, Mario ^a   Dupuy Chessa, Sophie ^a   Rieu, Dominique ^a   Dumas, Marlon ^b  

^a UNIV GRENOBLE ALPES   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TARTU   (Estonia)

Author keywords

BPMN 2.0; Choreography; Quality Framework

Indexed keywords

DATA PROCESSING;

BPMN 2.0; BUSINESS PROCESS MODELING; CHOREOGRAPHY; COLLABORATIVE BUSINESS PROCESS; DISCRIMINABILITY; EVALUATION FRAMEWORK; NOVICE USER;

MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

EID: 81855217365     PISSN: 18651348     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-25160-3_8     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Peltz, C.: Web services orchestration and choreography. Computer, 46-52 (2003)
2. W3C: Web services choreography description language version 1.0 (ws-cdl) - w3c candidate recommendation (2005)
3. Ross-Talbot, S., Brown, G., Honda, K., Yoshida, N., Carbone, M.: Pi4soa technologies fundation, http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/pi4soa/wiki
4. Decker, G., Kirov, M., Zaha, J., Dumas, M.: Maestro for Lets Dance: An Environment for Modeling Service Interactions. BPM Demo Session, p. 32 (2006)
5. Nitzsche, J., Van Lessen, T., Leymann, F.: Extending bpellight for expressing multi-partner message exchange patterns. In: 12th International IEEE Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference, pp. 245-254. IEEE (2008)
6. Decker, G., Kopp, O., Leymann, F., Weske, M.: Interacting services: from specification to execution. Data & Knowledge Engineering 68(10), 946-972 (2009)
7. Barker, A., Walton, C., Robertson, D.: Choreographing Web Services. IEEE Transactions on Services Computing 2(2), 152-166 (2009)
8. OMG: Business process model and notation (bpmn 2.0) (2011), http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0/
9. Wohed, P., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Dumas, M., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Russell, N.: On the Suitability of BPMN for Business Process Modelling. In: Dustdar, S., Fiadeiro, J.L., Sheth, A.P. (eds.) BPM 2006. LNCS, vol. 4102, pp. 161-176. Springer, Heidelberg (2006) (Pubitemid 44568325)
10. van der Aalst, W., Ter Hofstede, A., Kiepuszewski, B., Barros, A.: Workflow patterns. Distributed and Parallel Databases 14(1), 5-51 (2003)
11. Recker, J., Indulska,M., Rosemann, M., Green, P.: Do process modelling techniques get better? A comparative ontological analysis of BPMN. In: Proceedings of the 16th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Sydney, Australia. Citeseer (2005)
12. Wahl, T., Sindre, G.: An analytical evaluation of BPMN using a semiotic quality framework. Advanced Topics in Database Research 5 (2006)
13. Krogstie, J., Sindre, G., Jørgensen, H.: Process models representing knowledge for action: a revised quality framework. European Journal of Information Systems 15(1), 91-102 (2006)
14. Decker, G., Weske, M.: Interaction-centric modeling of process choreographies. Inf. Syst. 36, 292-312 (2011)
15. Barros, A., Dumas, M., Oaks, P.: A critical overview of the web services choreography description language. BPTrends Newsletter 3 (2005)
16. Ross-Talbot, S., Brown, G., Honda, K., Yoshida, N., Carbone, M.: Soa best practices: Building a soa using process governance. JBoss (2009)
17. Wetzstein, B., Karastoyanova, D., Kopp, O., Leymann, F., Zwink, D.: Cross-organizational process monitoring based on service choreographies. In: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, pp. 2485-2490. ACM (2010)
18. Barros, A., Dumas, M., ter Hofstede, A.H.M.: Service Interaction Patterns. In: van der Aalst, W.M.P., Benatallah, B., Casati, F., Curbera, F. (eds.) BPM 2005. LNCS, vol. 3649, pp. 302-318. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
19. Ambler, S.: The elements of UML 2.0 style. Cambridge Univ. Pr. (2005)
20. Moody, D.: The Physics of Notations: Toward a Scientific Basis for Constructing Visual Notations in Software Engineering. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 756-779 (2009)
21. Weidlich, M., Barros, A., Mendling, J., Weske, M.: Vertical Alignment of Process Models-How Can We Get There? In: Halpin, T., Krogstie, J., Nurcan, S., Proper, E., Schmidt, R., Soffer, P., Ukor, R. (eds.) Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling. LNBIP, vol. 29, pp. 71-84. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
22. OASIS:Web services business process execution language v2.0 (ws-bpel 2.0) (2007)
23. Silver, B.: BPMN Method and Style: A levels-based methodology for BPM process modeling and improvement using BPMN 2.0. Cody-Cassidy Press, US (2009)
24. Fielding, R.: Architectural styles and the design of network-based software architectures. PhD thesis, Citeseer (2000)
25. Barros, A., Decker, G., Dumas, M., Weber, F.: Correlation Patterns in Service- Oriented Architectures. In: Dwyer, M.B., Lopes, A. (eds.) FASE 2007. LNCS, vol. 4422, pp. 245-259. Springer, Heidelberg (2007) (Pubitemid 350259354)
26. Dijkman, R., Dumas, M.: Service-oriented design: A multi-viewpoint approach. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems 13, 337-368 (2004)
27. Barros, A., Decker, G., Dumas, M.: Multi-staged and multi-viewpoint service choreography modelling. Technical report (2006)
28. Evitts, P.: A UML pattern language. New Riders Publishing, Thousand Oaks (2000)
29. Genon, N., Heymans, P., Amyot, D.: Analysing the Cognitive Effectiveness of the BPMN 2.0 Visual Notation. In: Malloy, B., Staab, S., van den Brand, M. (eds.) SLE 2010. LNCS, vol. 6563, pp. 377-396. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
30. Dijkman, R., Van Gorp, P.: BPMN 2.0 Execution Semantics Formalized as Graph Rewrite Rules. In: Mendling, J., Weidlich, M., Weske, M. (eds.) BPMN 2010. LNBIP, vol. 67, pp. 16-30. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
31. Decker, G., Kopp, O., Barros, A.: An introduction to service choreographies. Information Technology 50(2), 122-127 (2008)
32. Silver, B.: Bpmn model interchange: Update (2011), http://www.brsilver. com/2011/02/26/bpmn-model-interchange-update/