Evaluation of premise condition index in the context of Aedes aegypti control in Marília, São Paulo, Brazil

Dengue Bulletin

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 167-175

  Andrighetti, Maria Teresa Macoris ^a   Galvani, Karen Cristina ^a   Macoris, Maria De Lourdes Da Graça ^a  

^a SUPERINTENDÊNCIA DE CONTROLE DE ENDEMIAS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Aedes aegypti surveillance; Housing characteristics; Premise condition index; Vector control

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AEDES AEGYPTI; AGE; ARTICLE; BRAZIL; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; ENVIRONMENTAL PARAMETERS; HOUSEHOLD; HUMAN; LARVA; NONHUMAN; PREMISE CONDITION INDEX; PUPA (LIFE CYCLE STAGE); VECTOR CONTROL;

AEDES AEGYPTI; MARILIA;

EID: 81855216208     PISSN: 1020895X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Fundação Nacional da Saúde. Programa Nacional de Controle da Dengue (PNCD). Brasília, Funasa; 2002.
2. Tun-Lin W, Kay BH, Barnes A. The premise condition index: a tool for streamlining surveys of Aedes aegypti. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1995;53(6):591-4. (Pubitemid 26036344)
3. Moloney JM, Skelly C, Weinstein P, Maguire M, Ritchie S. Domestic Aedes aegypti breeding site surveillance: limitations of remote sensing as a predictive surveillance tool. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1998;59:261-264. (Pubitemid 28418985)
4. Gomez FE, Surez CMM, Cardenas RC. Factores que modifican los índices larvarios de Aedes aegypti en Colima, México. Rev Panam Salud Publica 2001;10:6-12.
5. Nogueira LA, Gushi LT, Miranda JE, Madeira NG, Ribolla PEM. Application of an alternative Aedes species (Diptera: Culicidae) surveillance method in Botucatu city, Sao Paulo, Brazil. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2005;73:309-311. (Pubitemid 41278705)
6. Maciel-de-Freitas R, Peres RC, Souza-Santos R, Lourenco de Oliveira. Occurrence, productivity and spatial distribution of key premises in two dengue-endemic areas of Rio de Janeiro and their role in adult Aedes aegypti spatial infestation pattern. Trop Med Int Health 2008;13(12):1488-1494.
7. Akerman M, Stephens C, Campanario P, Maia PB. Saúde e meio ambiente: uma análise de diferenciais intra-urbanos enfocando o Município de São Paulo, Brasil. Rev Saúde Pública 1994;28(4):320-325.
8. Akerman M, Campanario P, Maia PB. Saúde e meio ambiente: análise de diferenciais intraurbanos, Município de São Paulo, Brasil. Rev Saúde Pública 1996;30(4):372-382.
9. Costa AIP da, Natal D. Distribuição espacial da dengue e determinantes socioeconômicos em localidade urbana no Sudeste do Brasil. Rev Saúde Pública 1998;32(3):232-236. (Pubitemid 128506981)
10. Lacerda J, Calvo M, Freitas S. Diferenciais intra-urbanos no Município de Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brasil: potencial de uso para o planejamento em saúde. Cad Saúde Pública 2002;18(5):1331-1338.
11. Oliveira CDL, Assunção R, Reis IA, Fernando AP. Spatial distribution of human and canine visceral leishmaniasis in Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais State, Brasil, 1994-1997. Cad Saúde Pública 2001;17(5):1231-1239.
12. Ximenes RA, Martelli CM, [12] Souza WV, Lapa TM, Albuquerque M, Andrade AL, Morais Neto OL, Silva SA, Lima ML, Portugal JL. Vigilância de doenças endêmicas em áreas urbanas: a interface entre mapas de setores censitários e indicadores de morbidade. Cad Saúde Pública 1999;15(1):53-62.
13. Marmot MG, Kogevinas M, Elston MA. Social/economic status and disease. Annu Rev Public Health 1987;8:111-135.
14. Barker DJP, Osmond C. Infant mortality, childhood nutrition, and ischaemic heart disease in England and Wales. Lancet 1986;327:1077-1081. (Pubitemid 16106274)
15. Dengue. Casos autóctones por DIR e município. Centro de Vigilância Epidemiológica. Secretaria de Estado da Saúde. São Paulo. Avaiable at: http: http://www.cve.saude.sp.gov.br/htm/zoo/Den- dir06.htm. Accessed on March 13th, 2010.
16. Manual de vigilância Entomológica de Aedes aegypti, Superintendência de Controle de Endemias, Secretaria de Estado da Saúde, 1997.
17. Clark GG, Seda H, Gubler DJ. Use of the "CDC backpack aspirator" for surveillance of Aedes aegypti in San Juan, Puerto Rico. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 1994;10(1):119-24.
18. Focks DA, Chadee DD. Pupal survey: an epidemiologically significant surveillance method for Aedes aegypti: an example using data from Trinidad. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1997;56(2):159-67. (Pubitemid 27131674)
19. Focks DA. A review of entomological sampling methods and indicators for dengue vectors. Document no. TDR/IDE/ Den/03.1. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2002.
20. Strickman D, Kittayapong P. Dengue and its vectors in Thailand: calculated transmission risk from total pupal counts of Aedes aegypti and association of wing-length measurements with aspects of the larval habitat. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2003;68(2):209-17. (Pubitemid 38240547)
21. Nathan MB, Focks DA, Kroeger A. Pupal demographic surveys to inform dengue-vector control. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 2006;Suppl. 1:S1-S3. (Pubitemid 46768709)
22. Mazine CAB, Macoris MLG, Andrighetti MTM, Yasumaro S, Silva ME, Nelson MJ, Winch PJ. Disposable containers as larval habitats for Aedes aegypti in a city wit regular refuse collection: A study in Marilia, Sao Paulo State, Brazil. Acta Tropica 1996;62:1-13. (Pubitemid 26396336)
23. Macoris MLG, Mazine CAB, Andrighetti MTM, Yasumaro S, Silva ME, Nelson MJ, Winch PJ. Factors favoring houseplant container infestation with Aedes aegypti larvae in Marilia, Sao Paulo, Brazil. Pan Am Jour Public Health 1997;1(4):280-286.
24. Yasumaro S, Silva ME, Mazine CAB, Andrighetti MTM, Macoris MLG, Winch P. Community involvement in a dengue prevention project in Marilia, São Paulo State, Brazil. Human Organization 1998;57(2):209-214. (Pubitemid 29321751)