The near-miss effect in slot-machine gambling: Modulation of feedback-related negativity by subjective value

NeuroReport

Volumn 22, Issue 18, 2011, Pages 989-993

  Luo, Qiuling ^a   Wang, Yang ^a   Qu, Chen ^a  

^a SOUTH CHINA NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Feedback related negativity; near miss; slot machine gambling; subjective value

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COGNITION; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; PATHOLOGICAL GAMBLING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS, P300; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; FEMALE; GAMES, EXPERIMENTAL; HUMANS; MALE; REACTION TIME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 81855208914     PISSN: 09594965     EISSN: 1473558X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e32834da8ae     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Reid RL. The psychology of the nearmiss. J Gambl Behav 1986; 2:32-39.
2. Cote D, Caron A, Aubert J, Desrochers V, Ladouceur R. Near wins prolong gambling on a video lottery terminal. J Gambl Stud 2003; 19:433-438. (Pubitemid 39024150)
3. Griffiths M. Psychobiology of the near-miss in fruit machine gambling. J Psychol1991; 125:347-357.
4. Kassinove JI, Schare ML. Effects of the 'near miss' and the 'big win' on persistence at slot machine gambling. Psychol Addict Behav 2001; 15:155-158. (Pubitemid 32803135)
5. Clark L, Lawrence AJ, Astley-Jones F, Gray N. Gambling near-misses enhance motivation to gamble and recruit win-related brain circuitry. Neuron 2009; 61:481-490.
6. Gehring WJ, Willoughby AR. The medial frontal cortex and the rapid processing of monetary gains and losses. Science 2002; 295:2279-2282. (Pubitemid 34258845)
7. Holroyd CB, Larsen JT, Cohen JD. Context dependence of the event-related brain potential associated with reward and punishment. Psychophysiology 2004; 41:245-253. (Pubitemid 38524096)
8. Miltner WHR, Braun CH, Coles MGH. Event-related brain potentials following incorrect feedback in a time-estimation task: evidence for a 'generic' neural system for error detection. J Cogn Neurosci 1997; 9:788-798. (Pubitemid 28025194)
9. Yeung N, Holroyd CB, Cohen JD. ERP correlates of feedback and reward processing in the presence and absence of response choice. Cereb Cortex 2005; 15:535-544. (Pubitemid 40577470)
10. Jia SW, Li H, Luo YJ, Chen AT, Wang BX, Zhou XL. Detecting perceptual conflict by the feedback-related negativity in brain potentials. Neuro Report 2007; 18:1385-1388. (Pubitemid 47344327)
11. Yasuda A, Sato A, Miyawaki K, Kumano H, Kuboki T. Error-related negativity reflects detection of negative reward prediction error. Neuro Report 2004; 15:2561-2565. (Pubitemid 39579354)
12. Donkers FCL, Nieuwenhuis S, van Boxtel GJM. Mediofrontal negativities in the absence of responding. Cogn Brain Res 2005; 25:777-787. (Pubitemid 41774443)
13. Holroyd CB, Coles MGH. The neural basis of human error processing: reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. Psychol Rev 2002; 109:679-709.
14. Hajcak G, Holroyd CB, Moser JS, Simons RF. Brain potentials associated with expected and unexpected good and bad outcomes. Psychophysiology 2005; 42:161-170. (Pubitemid 40529868)
15. Hajcak G, Moser JS, Holroyd CB, Simons RF. It's worse than you thought: the feedback negativity and violations of reward prediction in gambling tasks. Psychophysiology 2007; 44:905-912. (Pubitemid 47609612)
16. Hajcak G, Moser JS, Holroyd CB, Simons RF. The feedback-related negativity reflects the binary evaluation of good versus bad outcomes. Biol Psychol2006; 71:148-154. (Pubitemid 43082242)
17. Leng Y, Zhou X. Modulation of the brain activity in outcome evaluation by interpersonal relationship: an ERP study. Neuropsychologia 2010; 48:448-455.
18. Yu R, Zhou X. Brain responses to outcomes of one's own and other's performance in a gambling task. Neuro Report 2006; 17:1747-1 751. (Pubitemid 44621577)
19. Li P, Yuan J, Jia S, Feng T, Chen A, Li H. Feedback-related negativity effects vanished with false or monetary loss choice. Neuro Report 2009; 20:788-792.
20. Bellebaum C, Polezzi D, Daum I. It is less than you expected: the feedback-related negativity reflects violations of reward magnitude expectations. Neuropsychologia 2010; 48:3343-3350.
21. Goyer JP,Woldorff MG, Huettel SA. Rapid electrophysiological brain responses are influenced by both valence and magnitude of monetary rewards. J Cogn Neurosci 2008; 20:2058-2069.
22. Holroyd CB, Hajcak G, Larsen JT. The good, the bad and the neutral: electrophysiological responses to feedback stimuli. Brain Res 2006; 1105:93-101. (Pubitemid 44175960)
23. Parke J, Griffiths M. Gambling addiction and the evolution of the 'near miss'. Addict Res Theory 2004; 12:407-411. (Pubitemid 39524081)
24. Habib R, Dixon MR. Neurobehavioral evidence for the 'near-miss' effect in pathological gamblers. J Exp Anal Behav 2010; 93:313-328.
25. Wu Y, Zhou X. The P300 and reward valence, magnitude, and expectancy in outcome evaluation. Brain Res 2009; 1286:114-122.