Do mathematicians have above average musical skill?

Music Perception

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 203-213

  Haimson, Jennifer ^a   Swain, Deanna ^a   Winner, Ellen ^a  

^a BOSTON COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Mathematicians; Musicality; Musicianship; Nonmathematicians; Self report

Indexed keywords

EID: 81855206260     PISSN: 07307829     EISSN: 15338312     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1525/mp.2011.29.2.203     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. American Mathematical Society, Combined Membership List (2009). Retrieved from http://www.ams.org/cml
2. Bahna-James, T. (1991). The relationship between mathematics and music: Secondary school perspectives. Journal of Negro Education, 60, 477-485.
3. Bahr, N., & Christensen, C. (2000). Inter-domain transfer between mathematical skill and musicianship. Journal of Structural Learning and Intelligent Systems, 14, 187-197.
4. Carifio, J., & Perla, R. (2007). Ten common misunderstandings, misconceptions, persistent myths and urban legends about Likert scales and Likert response formats and their antidotes. Journal of Social Sciences, 3, 106-116.
5. de Winter, J. C. F., & Dodou, D. (2010). Five-point Likert items: t-test versus Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 15 (11). Retrieved from http://pareonline. net/pdf/v15n11.pdf
6. Fargnoli, A.N., & Gillespie, M.P. (2006). Critical companion to James Joyce: A literary reference to his life and work. New York: Facts on File.
7. Fauvel, J., Flood, R., & Wilson, R. (2006). Music and mathematics: From Pythagoras to fractals. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
8. Gardner, D. G., Cummings, L. L., Dunham, R. B., & Pierce, J.L. (1998). Single-item versus multiple-item measurement scales: An empirical comparison. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 898-915.
9. Gleik, J. (1992). Richard Feynman and modern physics. London, UK: Little, Brown and Company.
10. Graziano, A. B., Peterson, M., & Shaw, G. L. (1999). Enhanced learning of proportional math through music training and spatial-temporal training. Neurological Research, 21, 139-152. (Pubitemid 29157163)
11. Haecker, V., & Ziehen, T. (1922). Zur Vererbung und Entwicklung der musikalischen Begabung. [Inheritance and development of musical talent]. Leipzig: J. A. Barth.
12. Harkleroad, L. (2006). The math behind the music. New York: Cambridge University Press.
13. Helmbold, N., Rammsayer, T., & Altenmüller, E. (2005). Differences in primary mental abilities between musicians and nonmusicians. Journal of Individual Differences, 26, 74-85.
14. Howat, R. (1983). Debussy in proportion: A musical analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
15. Jamieson S. (2004). Likert scales: How to (ab)use them. Medical Education, 38, 1217-1218. (Pubitemid 39647371)
16. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1972). Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 430-445.
17. Lendavi, E. (1971). Bela Bartok: An analysis of his music. London, UK: Kahn & Averill.
18. Madden, C. (2005). The golden proportion in musical form. Salt Lake City, UT: High Art Press.
19. McClain, D. L. (2010, August 28). Skilled at the chessboard, keyboard, and blackboard. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/ 29/crosswords/chess/29chess.html
20. Modern Language Association, Membership Directory (2009). Retrieved from http://www.mla.org/
21. Pannenborg, H. J., & Pannenborg, W. A. (1915). Die Psychologie der Musiker [The psychology of musicians]. Zeitschrift fur Psychologie, 73, 91-136.
22. Patel, A. D. (2010). Music, language, and the brain. New York: Oxford.
23. Putz, J. (1995). The golden section and the piano sonatas of Mozart. Mathematics Magazine, 68, 275-282.
24. Rasmussen, J. L. (1989). Analysis of Likert-scale data: A reinterpretation of Gregoire and Driver. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 167-170.
25. Rauscher, F. H., & Hinton, S. C. (2011). Music instruction and its diverse extra-musical benefits. Music Perception, 29, 215-226.
26. Révész, G. (1946). Beziehung zwischen mathmatischer und musikalischer Begabung [Relationship between mathematical and musical talent]. Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Psychologie, und Ihre Anwendungen, 5, 269-281.
27. Révész, G. (1954). Introduction to the psychology of music. (G.I.C. de Courcy, Trans.) Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.
28. Rothstein, E. (2006). Emblems of the mind: The inner life of music and mathematics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
29. Schellenberg, E. G. (2004). Music lessons enhance IQ. Psychological Science, 15, 511-514. (Pubitemid 39080413)
30. Slevc, L. R., & Miyake, A. (2006). Individual differences in second language proficiency: Does musical ability matter? Psychological Science, 17, 675-681. (Pubitemid 44179877)
31. Steinhaus, H. (1969). Mathematical snapshots. New York: Oxford University Press.
32. Strait, D., & Kraus, N. (2011). Playing music for a smarter ear: Cognitive, perceptual and neurobiological evidence. Music Perception, 29, 133-146.
33. Stravinsky, I. (1971). Conversations with Robert Craft. London, UK: Pelican.
34. Strauss, J. (1978). Jean Jacques Rousseau: Musician. The Musical Quarterly, 64, 474-482.
35. Tsang, C. D., & Conrad, N. J. (2011). Music training and reading readiness. Music Perception, 29, 157-163.
36. Vaughn, K. (2000). Music and mathematics: Modest support for the oft-claimed relationship. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 34, 149-166.
37. Vaughn, K., & Winner, E. (2000). SAT scores of students who study the arts: What we can and cannot conclude about the association. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 34(3/4), 77-89.
38. Walser, H. (2001). The golden section (Spectrum). (J. Pedersen & P. Hilton, Trans.). Washington: The Mathematical Association of America.