Binocular eye movements evoked by self-induced motion parallax

Journal of Neuroscience

Volumn 31, Issue 47, 2011, Pages 17069-17073

  Frey, Jared ^a   Ringach, Dario L ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BINOCULAR CONVERGENCE; BINOCULAR VISION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; EYE MOVEMENT; FEMALE; GAZE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE DISPLAY; MALE; MONOCULAR VISION; NORMAL HUMAN; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

DEPTH PERCEPTION; EYE MOVEMENTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; MOVEMENT; PHOTIC STIMULATION; VISION DISPARITY;

EID: 81855186977     PISSN: 02706474     EISSN: 15292401     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2192-11.2011     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Brainard DH (1997) The psychophysics toolbox. Spat Vis 10:433-436.
2. Braunstein ML (2009) Motion parallax with and without active head movements. Perception 38:912-913; discussion 917-919.
3. Busettini C, Fitzgibbon EJ, Miles FA (2001) Short-latency disparity vergence in humans. J Neurophysiol 85:1129-1152.
4. Durgin FH, Proffitt DR, Olson TJ, Reinke KS (1995) Comparing depth from motion with depth from binocular disparity. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 21:679-699.
5. Enright JT (1987) Perspective vergence: oculomotor responses to line drawings. Vis Res 27:1513-1526.
6. Erkelens CJ, Collewijn H (1991) Control of vergence: gating among disparity inputs by target selection. Exp Brain Res 87:671-678.
7. Erkelens CJ, Regan D (1986) Human ocular vergence movements induced by changing size and disparity. J Physiol 379:145-169.
8. Ferris SH (1972) Motion parallax and absolute distance. J Exp Psychol 95:258-263.
9. Hoffmann J, Sebald A (2007) Eye vergence is susceptible to the hollow-face illusion. Perception 36:461-470.
10. Kleiner M, Brainard D, Pelli D (2007) What's new in Psychtoolbox-3? Perception 36 ECVP Abstract Supplement.
11. Leigh RJ, Zee DS (2006) The neurology of eye movements, Ed 4. New York: Oxford UP.
12. McLin LN Jr, Schor CM, Kruger PB (1988) Changing size (looming) as a stimulus to accommodation and vergence. Vis Res 28:883-898.
13. Medendorp WP, Tweed DB, Crawford JD (2003) Motion parallax is computed in the updating of human spatial memory. J Neurosci 23:8135-8142.
14. Müller J (1843). Elements of physiology. London: Taylor and Walton.
15. Nawrot M, Blake R (1989) Neural integration of information specifying structure from stereopsis and motion. Science 244:716-718.
16. Ono ME, Rivest J, Ono H (1986) Depth perception as a function of motion parallax and absolute-distance information. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 12:331-337.
17. Pelli DG (1997) The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. Spat Vis 10:437-442.
18. Rashbass C, Westheimer G (1961) Disjunctive eye movements. J Physiol 159: 339-360.
19. Ringach DL, Hawken MJ, Shapley R (1996) Binocular eye movements caused by the perception of three-dimensional structure from motion. Vis Res 36:1479-1492.
20. Rogers B (2009) Motion parallax as an independent cue for depth perception: a retrospective. Perception 38:907-911.
21. Rogers B, Graham M (1979) Motion parallax as an independent cue for depth perception. Perception 8:125-134.
22. Wagner M, Ehrenstein WH, Papathomas TV (2009) Vision in reverspective: percept driven versus data-driven eye control. Neurosci Lett 449:142-146.
23. Wexler M, Panerai F, Lamouret I, Droulez J (2001) Self-motion and the perception of stationary objects. Nature 409:85-88.
24. Wismeijer DA, Erkelens CJ (2009) The effect of changing size on vergence is mediated by changing disparity. J Vis 9:12.