Dissemination of quality-of-care research findings to breast oncology surgeons

Journal of Oncology Practice

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 257-262

  Shiovitz, Stacey ^a,b,c   Gay, Ashley ^a,b,c   Morris, Arden ^a,b,c   Graff, John J ^a,b,c   Katz, Steven J ^a,b,c   Hawley, Sarah T ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b Ann Arbor Veteran's Health Care System   (United States)

^c ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER RESEARCH; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; COMMUNITY SAMPLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH CARE SURVEY; HUMAN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INTERNET; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; ONCOLOGY; PILOT STUDY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 81855184874     PISSN: 15547477     EISSN: 1935469X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1200/JOP.2010.000195     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Choi BC: Understanding the basic principles of knowledge translation. J Epidemiol Community Health 59:93, 2005
2. Kerner J, Rimer B, Emmons K: Dissemination research and research dissemination: How can we close the gap? Health Psychol 24:443-446, 2005
3. Bowen DJ, Sorensen G, Weiner BJ, et al.: Dissemination research in cancer control: Where are we and where should we go? Cancer Causes Control 20:473-485, 2009
4. Glasgow RE, Lichtenstein E, Marcus A: Why don't we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy to effectiveness transition. Am J Public Health 93:1261-1267, 2003
5. Fitch MI, Nicoll I, Keller-Olaman S: Breast cancer information dissemination strategies-finding out what works. Can Oncol Nurs J 17:206-218, 2007
6. Katz SJ, Morrow M, Hawley ST, et al.: Coordinating cancer care: Patient and practice management processes among surgeons who treated breast cancer. Med Care 48:45-51, 2010
7. Katz SJ, Hawley ST, Abrahamse P, et al.: Does it matter where you go for breast surgery? Attending surgeons influence on variation in receipt of mastectomy for breast cancer. Med Care 48:892-899, 2010
8. Katz SJ, Lantz PM, Janz NK, et al.: Surgeon perspectives about local therapy for breast carcinoma. Cancer 104:1854-1861, 2005
9. Grimshaw J, Eccles M, Thomas R, et al.: Toward evidence-based quality improvement. Evidence (and its limitations) of the effectiveness of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies 1966-1998. J Gen Inter Med 21:S14-S20, 2006
10. Grimshaw JM, Thomas RE, MacLennan G, et al.: Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technol Assess 8:iii-iv, 1-72, 2004
11. Moorjani P, Fortnum H: Dissemination of information to general practitioners: A questionnaire survey. BMC Fam Pract 5:27, 2004
12. Wensing M, van der Weijden T, Grol R: Implementing guidelines and innovations in general practice: Which interventions are effective? Br J Gen Pract 48:991-997, 1998
13. Kryworuchko J, Stacey D, Bai N, et al.: Twelve years of clinical practice guideline development, dissemination and evaluation in Canada (1994-2005). Implement Sci 4:49, 2009
14. Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, et al.: Why don't physicians follow practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA 282:1458-1465, 1999
15. Farmer AP, Legare F, Turcot L, et al.: Printed educational materials: Effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD004398, 2008
16. Choi BCK, McQueen DV, Rootman I: Bridging the gap between scientists and decision makers. J Epidemiol Community Health 57:918, 2003
17. O'Donnell MP: Synthesis and dissemination of research findings: A critical next step in the evolution of health promotion. Am J Health Promot 18:iv-v, 2004
18. Bero LA, Grilli R, Grimshaw JM, et al.: Closing the gap between research and practice: An overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings. BMJ 317:465-468, 1998
19. Mathys J, Steurer J: Evaluation of an Internet site on evidence-based medicine. Praxis 89:1700-1706, 2000
20. Olivieri JJ, Knoll MB, Arn PH: Education format and resource preferences among registrants of a pediatric-focused CME website. Med Teach 31:e333-e337, 2009
21. Greenlaw C, Brown-Welty S: A comparison of web-based and paper-based survey methods: Testing assumptions of survey mode and response cost. Eval Rev 33:464-480, 2009
22. Kongsved SM, Basnov M, Holm-Christensen K, et al.: Response rate and completeness of questionnaires: A randomized study of Internet versus paper-and-pencil versions. J Am Int Res 9:e25, 2007