A temporary immersion system improves in vitro regeneration of peach palm through secondary somatic embryogenesis

Annals of Botany

Volumn 108, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 1463-1475

  Steinmacher, D A ^a,b   Guerra, M P ^b,c   Saare Surminski, K ^a   Lieberei, R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG   (Germany)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SANTA CATARINA   (Brazil)

^c Fellow of the National Research Council   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Bactris gasipaes; clonal propagation; Picloram; somatic embryogenesis; tissue culture

Indexed keywords

HERBICIDE; PHYTOHORMONE; PICLORAM;

ADULT; CYTOPLASM; EMBRYO; EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT; MONOCOTYLEDON; MORPHOLOGY; MORPHOMETRY; PHENOLIC COMPOUND; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY;

ARECACEAE; ARTICLE; CULTURE MEDIUM; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HISTOLOGY; IMMERSION; METHODOLOGY; PLANT SEED; PRENATAL DEVELOPMENT; SOMATIC EMBRYOGENESIS; ULTRASTRUCTURE; UNITED STATES;

ARECACEAE; CULTURE MEDIA; HAWAII; HERBICIDES; IMMERSION; PICLORAM; PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS; PLANT SOMATIC EMBRYOGENESIS TECHNIQUES; SEEDS;

BACTRIS GASIPAES;

EID: 81855168376     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: 10958290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcr033     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Albarran J, Bertrand B, Lartaud M, Etienne H. 2005. Cycle characteristics in a temporary immersion bioreactor affect regeneration, morphology, water and mineral status of coffee (Coffea arabica) somatic embryos. Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture 81: 27-36. (Pubitemid 40306849)
2. Alemanno L, Devic M, Niemenak N, et al. 2008. Characterization of leafy cotyledon1-like during embryogenesis in Theobroma cacao L. Planta 227: 853-866.
3. Arias O. 1985. Propagación vegetativa por cultivo de tejidos del pejibaye (Bactris gasipaes H.B.K.). Asbana 24: 24-27.
4. Arias O, Huete F. 1983. Vegetative propagation in vitro of pejibaye (Bactris gasipaes HBK). Turrialba 33: 103-108.
5. Bovi MLA, Martins CC, Spiering SH. 2004. Desidratação de sementes de quatro lotes de pupunheira: efeitos sobre a germinação e o vigor. Horticultura Brasileira 22: 109-112.
6. Canhoto JM, Mesquita JF, Cruz GS. 1996. Ultrastructural changes in cotyledons of Pineapple Guava (Myrtaceae) during somatic embryogenesis. Annals of Botany 78: 513-521. (Pubitemid 26392958)
7. Clement CR. 1988. Domestication of the Pejibaye palm (Bactris gasipaes): past and present. Advances in Economic Botany 6: 155-174.
8. Clement CR. 1997. Pupunha: Recursos genéticos, pesquisas realizadas e tecnologias disponíveis. In: Claret de Souza AG, Figueredo dos Santos A, eds. 18 Workshop sobre as Culturas de Cupuaçu e Pupunha da Amazônia. CPAA/EMBRAPA, Manaus, AM, 33-49.
9. Clement CR. 2008. Peach palm (Bactris gasipaes). In: Janick J, Paull RE, eds. The encyclopedia of fruit and nuts. Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing, 93-101.
10. Clement CR,Weber JC, van Leeuwen J, et al. 2004. Why extensive research and development did not promote use of peach palm fruit in Latin America. Agroforestry Systems 61-62: 195-206. (Pubitemid 38983042)
11. Delarue M, Prinsen E, Onckelen HV, Caboche M, Bellini C. 1998. Sur2 mutations of Arabidopsis thaliana define a new locus involved in the control of auxin homeostasis. The Plant Journal 14: 603-611.
12. Dubois T, Guedira M, Dubois J, Vasseur J. 1990. Direct somatic embryogenesis in roots of Cichorium - Is callose an early marker? Annals of Botany 65: 539-545.
13. Escalona M, Lorenzo JC, Gonzalez B, et al. 1999. Pineapple (Ananas comosus L-Merr) micropropagation in temporary immersion systems. Plant Cell Reports 18: 743-748.
14. Etienne H, Berthouly M. 2002. Temporary immersion systems in plant micropropagation. Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture 69: 215-231. (Pubitemid 34674140)
15. Etienne H, Lartaud M, Michaux-Ferriére N, Carron M, Berthouly M, Teisson C. 1997. Improvement of somatic embryogenesis in Hevea brasiliensis (Mü ll. Arg.) using the temporary immersion technique. In vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology - Plant 33: 81-87. (Pubitemid 28153958)
16. Feher A, Pasternak TP, Dudits D. 2003. Transition of somatic plant cells to an embryogenic state. Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture 74: 201-228. (Pubitemid 36784822)
17. Fernando SC, Verdeil JL, Hocher V, Weerakoon LK, Hirimburegama K. 2003. Histological analysis of plant regeneration from plumule explants of Cocos nucifera. Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture 72: 281-284. (Pubitemid 36280687)
18. Fisher DB. 1968. Protein staining of ribboned epon sections for light microscopy. Histochemie 16: 92-96.
19. Fukao T, Bailey-Serres J. 2004. Plant responses to hypoxia - is survival a balancing act? Trends in Plant Science 9: 449-456. (Pubitemid 39160941)
20. Gaj MD, Zhang SB, Harada JJ, Lemaux PG. 2005. Leafy cotyledon genes are essential for induction of somatic embryogenesis of Arabidopsis. Planta 222: 977-988. (Pubitemid 41706035)
21. Geigenberger P. 2003. Response of plant metabolism to too little oxygen. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 6: 247-256. (Pubitemid 36704510)
22. Goh DKS, Bon MC, Aliotti F, Escoute J, Ferriere N, Monteuuis O. 2001. In vitro somatic embryogenesis in two major rattan species: Calamus merrillii and Calamus subinermis. In vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology - Plant 37: 375-381. (Pubitemid 32956383)
23. Groll J, Mycock DJ, Gray VM, Laminski S. 2001. Secondary somatic embryogenesis of cassava on picloram supplemented media. Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture 65: 201-210. (Pubitemid 32682610)
24. Guerra MP, Handro W. 1998. Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration in different organs of Euterpe edulis Mart. (Palmae): control and structural features. Journal of Plant Research 111: 65-71. (Pubitemid 128185562)
25. Guilfoyle T. 2007. Plant biology - Sticking with auxin. Nature 446: 621-622.
26. Harada JJ. 1999. Signaling in plant embryogenesis. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 2: 23-27. (Pubitemid 29125939)
27. Jiménez VM. 2005. Involvement of plant hormones and plant growth regulators on in vitro somatic embryogenesis. Plant Growth Regulation 47: 91-110. (Pubitemid 41626580)
28. Karun A, Siril EA, Radha E, Parthasarathy VA. 2004. Somatic embryogenesis and plantlet regeneration from leaf and inflorescence explants of arecanut (Areca catechu L.). Current Science 86: 1623-1628. (Pubitemid 39160878)
29. Khalil SM, Cheah KT, Perez EA, Gaskill DA, Hu JS. 2002. Regeneration of banana (Musa spp. AAB cv. Dwarf Brazilian) via secondary somatic embryogenesis. Plant Cell Reports 20: 1128-1134.
30. Kwaaitaal MA, de Vries SC. 2007. The SERK1 gene is expressed in procambium and immature vascular cells. Journal of Experimental Botany 58: 2887-2896. (Pubitemid 47511737)
31. Li L, Qu R. 2002. In vitro somatic embryogenesis in turf-type bermudagrass: roles of abscisic acid and gibberellic acid, and occurrence of secondary somatic embryogenesis. Plant Breeding 121: 155-158. (Pubitemid 34414294)
32. Martinelli L, Candioli E, Costa D, Poletti V, Rascio N. 2001. Morphogenic competence of Vitis rupestris S. secondary somatic embryos with a long culture history. Plant Cell Reports 20: 279-284. (Pubitemid 32623609)
33. Maximova SN, Alemanno L, Young A, Ferriere N, Traore A, Guiltinan MJ. 2002. Efficiency, genotypic variability, and cellular origin of primary and secondary somatic embryogenesis of Theobroma cacao L. In vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology - Plant 38: 252-259. (Pubitemid 34623037)
34. Mora-Urpí J, Weber JC, Clement CR. 1997. Peach-Palm (Bactris gasipaes Kunth). Rome: Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research and International Plant Genetic Resources Institute. Available via http:// www.bioversityinternational.org/publications.html.
35. Morel G, Wetmore RH. 1951. Tissue culture of monocotyledons. American Journal of Botany 38: 138-140.
36. Moura EF, Ventrella MC, Motoike SY, de Sa AQ, Carvalho M, Manfio CE. 2008. Histological study of somatic embryogenesis induction on zygotic embryos of macaw palm (Acrocomia aculeata (Jacq.) Lodd. ex Martius). Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture 95: 175-184.
37. Murashige T, Skoog F. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiologia Plantarum 15: 473-497.
38. Niemenak N, Saare-Surminski K, Rohsius C, Ndoumou DO, Lieberei R. 2008. Regeneration of somatic embryos in Theobroma cacao L. in temporary immersion bioreactor and analyses of free amino acids in different tissues. Plant Cell Reports 27: 667-676.
39. Pasternak TP, Prinsen E, Ayaydin F, et al. 2002. The role of Auxin, pH, and stress in the activation of embryogenic cell division in leaf protoplastderived cells of alfalfa. Plant Physiology 129: 1807-1819. (Pubitemid 34923245)
40. Pedroso MC, Pais MS. 1995. Factors controlling somatic embryogenesis - Cell wall changes as an in vivo marker of embryogenic competence. Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture 43: 147-154.
41. Perera PIP, Hocher V, Verdeil JL, Doulbeau S, Yakandawala DMD, Weerakoon LK. 2007. Unfertilised ovary: a novel explants for coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) somatic embryogenesis. Plant Cell Reports 26: 21-28. (Pubitemid 44950297)
42. Perez-Nunez MT, Chan JL, Saenz L, Gonzalez T, Verdeil JL, Oropeza C. 2006. Improved somatic embryogenesis from Cocos nucifera (L.) plumule explants. In vitro Cellular Developmental Biology - Plant 42: 37-43.
43. Pfluger J, Zambryski PC. 2001. Cell growth: the power of symplastic isolation. Current Biology 11: R436-R439. (Pubitemid 32532802)
44. Quiroz-Figueroa FR, Rojas-Herrera R, Galaz-Avalos RM, Loyola-Vargas VM. 2006. Embryo production through somatic embryogenesis can be used to study cell differentiation in plants. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 86: 285-301. (Pubitemid 350161566)
45. Raemakers CJJM, Jacobsen E, Visser RGF. 1995. Secondary somatic embryogenesis and applications in plant breeding. Euphytica 81: 93-107.
46. Reis E, Batista MT, Canhoto JM. 2008. Effect and analysis of phenolic compounds during somatic embryogenesis induction in Feijoa sellowiana Berg. Protoplasma 232: 193-202. (Pubitemid 351640107)
47. Saenz L, Azpeitia A, Chuc-Armendariz B, et al. 2006. Morphological and histological changes during somatic embryo formation from coconut plumule explants. In vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology - Plant 42: 19-25.
48. Sané D, Aberlenc-Bertossi F, Gassama-Dia YK, et al. 2006. Histocytological analysis of callogenesis and somatic embryogenesis from cell suspensions of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera). Annals of Botany 98: 301-308. (Pubitemid 44310230)
49. Sankar-Thomas YD, Saare-Surminski K, Lieberei R. 2008. Plant regeneration via somatic embryogenesis of Camptotheca acuminata in temporary immersion system (TIS). Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture 95: 163-173.
50. Schmidt EDL, Guzzo F, Toonen MAJ, de Vries SC. 1997. A leucine-rich repeat containing receptor-like kinase marks somatic plant cells competent to form embryos. Development 124: 2049-2062. (Pubitemid 27270273)
51. Schwendiman J, Pannetier C, Michaux-Ferriere N. 1988. Histology of somatic embryogenesis from leaf explants of the oil palm Elaeis guineensis. Annals of Botany 62: 43-52.
52. Sharma SK, Millam S, Hein I, Bryan GJ. 2008. Cloning and molecular characterization of a potato SERK gene transcriptionally induced during initiation of somatic embryogenesis. Planta 228: 319-330.
53. Stein M, Stephens C. 1991. Effect of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid and activated charcoal on somatic embryogenesis of Bactris gasipaes HBK. Turrialba 41: 196-201.
54. Steinmacher DA, Cangahuala-Inocente GC, Clement CR, Guerra MP. 2007a. Somatic embryogenesis from peach palm zygotic embryos. In vitro Cellular and Development Biology - Plant 43: 124-132. (Pubitemid 46790965)
55. Steinmacher DA, Clement CR, Guerra MP. 2007b. Somatic embryogenesis from immature peach palm inflorescence explants: towards development of an efficient protocol. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 89: 15-22. (Pubitemid 46623330)
56. Steinmacher DA, Krohn NG, Dantas ACM, Stefenon VM, Clement CR, Guerra MP. 2007c. Somatic embryogenesis in peach palm using the thin cell layer technique: induction, morpho-histological aspects and AFLP analysis of somaclonal variation. Annals of Botany 100: 699-709. (Pubitemid 47511779)
57. Talavera CR, Espadas FL, Aguilar ML, Maust BE, Oropeza CM, Santamaria JM. 2001. The control of leaf water loss by coconut plants cultured in vitro depends on the type of membrane used for ventilation. Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 76: 569-574. (Pubitemid 32925815)
58. Tan X, Calderon-Villalobos LIA, Sharon M, et al. 2007. Mechanism of auxin perception by the TIR1 ubiquitin ligase. Nature 446: 640-645. (Pubitemid 46606890)
59. Teixeira JB, Söndahl MR, Nakamura T, Kirby EG. 1995. Establishment of oil palm cell suspensions and plant regeneration. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 40: 105-111.
60. Valverde R, Arias O, Thorpe TA. 1987. Picloram-induced somatic embryogenesis in pejibaye palm (Bactris gasipaes HBK). Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture 10: 149-156.
61. Verdeil JL, Hocher V, Huet C, et al. 2001. Ultrastructural changes in coconut calli associated with the acquisition of embryogenic competence. Annals of Botany 88: 9-18. (Pubitemid 32632383)
62. Verdeil JL, Alemanno L, Niemenak N, Tranbarger TJ. 2007. Pluripotent versus totipotent plant stem cells: dependence versus autonomy? Trends in Plant Science 12: 245-252.
63. Walsh TA, Neal R, Merlo AO, et al. 2006. Mutations in an auxin receptor homolog AFB5 and in SGT1b confer resistance to synthetic picolinate auxins and not to 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid or indole-3-acetic acid in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 142: 542-552. (Pubitemid 44583125)