Impairments of the medial olivocochlear system increase the risk of noise-induced auditory neuropathy in laboratory mice

Otology and Neurotology

Volumn 32, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 1568-1578

  May, Bradford J ^a   Lauer, Amanda M ^a   Roos, Matthew J ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; AUDITORY NERVOUS SYSTEM; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COCHLEA; EVOKED BRAIN STEM AUDITORY RESPONSE; HEARING LOSS; MOUSE; NOISE INJURY; OLIVARY NUCLEUS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; SPONTANEOUS OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; VESTIBULOCOCHLEAR NERVE DISEASE;

ANIMALS; AUDITORY PATHWAYS; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COCHLEA; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY, BRAIN STEM; HEARING LOSS, CENTRAL; HEARING LOSS, NOISE-INDUCED; MICE; OLIVARY NUCLEUS; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS;

EID: 81855163402     PISSN: 15317129     EISSN: 15374505     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31823389a1     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Dowley AC, Whitehouse WP, Mason SM, Cope Y, Grant J, Gibbin KP. Auditory neuropathy: unexpectedly common in a screened newborn population. Dev Med Child Neurol 2009;51:642-6.
2. Berg AL, Spitzer JB, Towers HM, Bartosiewicz C, Diamond BE. Newborn hearing screening in the NICU: profile of failed auditory brainstem response/passed otoacoustic emission. Pediatrics 2005; 116:933-8. (Pubitemid 44542821)
3. D'Agostino JA, Austin L. Auditory neuropathy: apotentially under-recognized neonatal intensive care unit sequela. Adv Neonatal Care 2004;4:344-53. (Pubitemid 39601612)
4. Busch-Vishniac IJ, West JE, Barnhill C, Hunter T, Orellana D, Chivukula R. Noise levels in Johns Hopkins Hospital. JAcoust Soc Am 2005;118:3629-45. (Pubitemid 41820865)
5. Williams AL, van Drongelen W, Lasky RE. Noise in contemporary neonatal intensive care. J Acoust Soc Am 2007;121:2681-90. (Pubitemid 46701266)
6. American Academy of Pediatrics. Noise: a hazard for the fetus and newborn. Pediatrics 1997;100:724-7.
7. Kujawa SG, Liberman MC. Acceleration of age-related hearing loss by early noise exposure: evidence of a misspent youth. J Neurosci 2006;26:2115-23.
8. Moore DR. Auditory processing disorders: acquisition and treatment. J Commun Disord 2007;40:295-304. (Pubitemid 46843083)
9. Balen SA, Bretzke L, Mottecy CM, Liebel G, Boeno MR, Gondim LM. Temporal resolution in children: comparing normal hearing, conductive hearing loss and auditory processing disorder. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2009;75:123-9.
10. Fuchs PA, Murrow BW. Cholinergic inhibition of short (outer) hair cells of the chick's cochlea. J Neurosci 1992;12:800-9.
11. Liberman MC. The olivocochlear efferent bundle and susceptibility of the inner ear to acoustic injury. J Neurophysiol 1991;65: 123-32.
12. May BJ, McQuone SJ. Effects of bilateral olivocochlear lesions on pure-tone intensity discrimination in cats. Aud Neurosci 1995;1: 385-400. (Pubitemid 3018573)
13. Winslow RL, Sachs MB. Effect of electrical stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle on auditory nerve response to tones in noise. J Neurophysiol 1987;57:1002-21. (Pubitemid 17059743)
14. Hood LJ, Berlin CI, Bordelon J, Rose K. Patients with auditory neuropathy/dys-synchrony lack efferent suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions. J Am Acad Audiol 2003;14:302-13.
15. Saada AA, Niparko JK, Ryugo DK. Morphological changes in the cochlear nucleus of congenitally deaf white cats. Brain Res 1996; 736:315-28. (Pubitemid 26356490)
16. Sanes DH. The development of synaptic function and integration in the central auditory system. J Neurosci 1993;13:2627-37.
17. Lauer AM, May BJ. The medial olivocochlear system attenuates the developmental impact of early noise exposure. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2011;12:329-43.
18. Vetter DE, Liberman MC, Mann J, et al. Role of alpha9 nicotinic ACh receptor subunits in the development and function of cochlear efferent innervation. Neuron 1999;23:93-103. (Pubitemid 29262467)
19. Elgoyhen AB, Johnson DS, Boulter J, Vetter DE, Heinemann S. Alpha 9: an acetylcholine receptor with novel pharmacological properties expressed in rat cochlear hair cells. Cell 1994;79:705-15. (Pubitemid 24363813)
20. Lauer AM, May BJ, Hao ZJ, Watson J. Analysis of environmental sound levels in modern rodent housing rooms. Lab Anim (NY) 2009; 38:154-60.
21. Di Nardo W, Ghirlanda G, Paludetti G, et al. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions and selective sensorineural loss in IDDM. Diabetes Care 1998;21:1317-21. (Pubitemid 28365690)
22. Parham K, Sun XM, Kim DO. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in the CBA/J mouse model of presbycusis. Hear Res 1999;134:29-38. (Pubitemid 29354514)
23. Boo NY. Current understanding of auditory neuropathy. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2008;37:60-3.
24. Kujawa SG, Liberman MC. Adding insult to injury: cochlear nerve degeneration after "temporary" noise-induced hearing loss. J Neurosci 2009;29:14077-85.
25. Si F, Brodie H, Gillespie PG, Vazquez AE, Yamoah EN. Developmental assembly of transduction apparatus in chick basilar papilla. J Neurosci 2003;23:10815-26. (Pubitemid 37499688)
26. Simmons DD, Moulding HD, Zee D. Olivocochlear innervation of inner and outer hair cells during postnatal maturation: an immu-nocytochemical study. Brain Res Dev Brain Res 1996;95:213-26 (Pubitemid 26273819)
27. Berlin CI, Morlet T, Hood LJ. Auditory neuropathy/dyssynchrony: its diagnosis and management. Pediatr Clin North Am 2003;50: 331-40, vii-viii. (Pubitemid 36666560)
28. May BJ, Aleszczyk CM, Sachs MB. Single-unit recording in the ventral cochlear nucleus of behaving cats. J Neurosci Methods 1991; 40:155-69.
29. May BJ, Prell GS, Sachs MB. Vowel representations in the ventral cochlear nucleus of the cat: effects of level, background noise, and behavioral state. JNeurophysiol 1998;79:1755-67. (Pubitemid 28183315)
30. Melcher JR, Kiang NY. Generators of the brainstem auditory evoked potential in cat. III: Identified cell populations. Hear Res 1996;93:52-71. (Pubitemid 26164851)
31. Ryugo DK, Fekete DM. Morphology of primary axosomatic endings in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus of the cat: a study of the endbulbs of Held. J Comp Neurol 1982;210:239-57. (Pubitemid 12036968)
32. Blackburn CC, Sachs MB. Classification of unit types in the ante-roventral cochlear nucleus: PST histograms and regularity analysis. JNeurophysiol 1989;62:1303-29. (Pubitemid 20018088)
33. Rhode WS, Oertel D, Smith PH. Physiological response properties of cells labeled intracellularly with horseradish peroxidase in cat ventral cochlear nucleus. J CompNeurol 1983;213:448-63. (Pubitemid 13158842)
34. Pfeiffer RR. Anteroventral cochlear nucleus: wave forms of extra-cellularly recorded spike potentials. Science 1966;154:667-8.
35. Winter IM, Palmer AR. Responses of single units in the ante-roventral cochlear nucleus of the guinea pig. Hear Res 1990;44: 161-78. (Pubitemid 20088780)
36. Palmer AR. Encoding of rapid amplitude fluctuations by cochlear-nerve fibres in the guinea-pig. Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1982;236: 197-202. (Pubitemid 12037429)
37. Rhode WS, Greenberg S. Encoding of amplitude modulation in the cochlear nucleus of the cat. J Neurophysiol 1994;71: 1797-825. (Pubitemid 24153044)
38. Goldberg JM, Brown PB. Response of binaural neurons of dog superior olivary complex to dichotic tonal stimuli: some physiological mechanisms of sound localization. J Neurophysiol 1969;32: 613-36.
39. Zeng FG, Oba S, Garde S, Sininger Y, Starr A. Temporal and speech processing deficits in auditory neuropathy. Neuroreport 1999;10: 3429-35.
40. Michalewski HJ, Starr A, Nguyen TT, Kong YY, Zeng FG. Auditory temporal processes in normal-hearing individuals and in patients with auditory neuropathy. Clin Neurophysiol 2005;116: 669-80. (Pubitemid 40249834)
41. Yalcinkaya F, Muluk NB, Atas A, Keith RW. Random gap detection test and random gap detection test-expanded results in children with auditory neuropathy. Int JPediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2009;73: 1558-63.
42. Hoffman HS, Fleshler M. Startle reaction: modification by background acoustic stimulation. Science 1963;141:928-30.
43. El-Badry MM, McFadden SL. Evaluation of inner hair cell and nerve fiber loss as sufficient pathologies underlying auditory neuropathy. Hear Res 2009;255:84-90.
44. Zeng FG, Kong YY, Michalewski HJ, Starr A. Perceptual consequences of disrupted auditory nerve activity. Neurophysiol 2005;93:3050-63. (Pubitemid 40720888)
45. Kraus N, Bradlow AR, Cheatham MA, et al. Consequences of neural asynchrony: a case of auditory neuropathy. Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2000;1:33-45. (Pubitemid 32405390)
46. Narne VK, Vanaja CS. Perception of envelope-enhanced speech in the presence of noise by individuals with auditory neuropathy. Ear Hear 2009;30:136-42.
47. Redd EE, Pongstaporn T, Ryugo DK. The effects of congenital deafness on auditory nerve synapses and globular bushy cells in cats. Hear Res 2000;147:160-74. (Pubitemid 30658063)
48. James AL. The assessment of olivocochlear function in neonates with real-time distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Laryngoscope 2011;121:202-13.
49. Hood LJ. A review of objective methods of evaluating auditory neural pathways. Laryngoscope 1999;109:1745-8. (Pubitemid 29533913)
50. Ostapoff EM, Morest DK. Synaptic organization of globular bushy cells in the ventral cochlear nucleus of the cat: a quantitative study. Comp Neurol 1991;314:598-613.
51. Joris PX, Carney LH, Smith PH, Yin TC. Enhancement of neural synchronization in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus. I. Responses to tones at the characteristic frequency. Neurophysiol 1994;71: 1022-36. (Pubitemid 24094872)
52. Rhode WS. Response patterns to sound associated with labeled globular/bushy cells in cat. Neuroscience 2008;154:87-98.