Shallow water table depth algorithm in Swat: Recent developments

Transactions of the ASABE

Volumn 54, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 1705-1711

  Moriasi, D N ^a   Arnold, J G ^b   Vazquez Amabile G G ^c   Engel, B A ^d  

^a USDA ARS GRAZINGLANDS RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

^b U S DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE LA PLATA   (Argentina)

^d Purdue University   (United States)

Author keywords

DRAINMOD; Simulation; SWAT; Water table depth; Watershed

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTIONS; CALIBRATION PARAMETERS; CALIBRATION PROCESS; DRAINMOD; FARM MACHINES; HYDROLOGIC MODELS; HYDROLOGIC RESPONSE UNITS; INDIANA; MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; MODEL PERFORMANCE; OBSERVATION WELLS; RIVER BASINS; SHALLOW WATER TABLES; SIMULATION; SOIL AND WATER ASSESSMENT TOOL; SOIL PHYSICAL PROPERTY; SOIL SALINITY; SWAT; TRAFFICABILITY; VALIDATION PERIODS; WATER TABLE DEPTH; WATER TABLES; WATERSHED SCALE;

AGRICULTURAL CHEMICALS; AGRICULTURAL MACHINERY; AGRICULTURE; ALGORITHMS; CALIBRATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GROUNDWATER; LANDFORMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SOILS; WATER QUALITY; WATERSHEDS; WELLS;

GEOLOGIC MODELS;

AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION; ALGORITHM; CALIBRATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DRAINAGE; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; HYDROLOGICAL RESPONSE; IRRIGATION; NUMERICAL MODEL; SALINITY; SHALLOW WATER; SOIL TYPE; WATER DEPTH; WATER TABLE; WATERSHED;

INDIANA; MUSCATATUCK RIVER; UNITED STATES;

EID: 81755186931     PISSN: 21510032     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Arnold, J. G., R. Srinivasan, R. S. Muttiah, and J. R. Williams. 1998. Large-area hydrologic modeling and assessment: Part I. Model development. J. American Water Res. Assoc. 34(1): 73-89. (Pubitemid 28190080)
2. Arnold, J. G., and N. Fohrer. 2005. SWAT2000: Current capabilities and research opportunities in applied watershed modeling. Hydrol. Proc. 19(3): 563-572. (Pubitemid 40289981)
3. Chaubey, I., C. T. Haan, S. Grunwald, and J. M. Salisbury. 1999. Uncertainty in the model parameters due to spatial variability of rainfall. J. Hydrol. 220(1): 48-61. (Pubitemid 29341834)
4. Desmond, E. D., A. D. Ward, N. R. Fausey, and S. R. Workman. 1996. Comparison of daily water table depth prediction by four simulation models. Trans. ASAE 39(1): 111-118. (Pubitemid 126778623)
5. Donigian, A. S., J. C. Imhoff, and B. R. Bicknell. 1983. Predicting water quality resulting from agricultural nonpoint-source pollution via simulation: HSPF. In Agricultural Management and Water Quality, 200-249. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press.
6. Du, B., J. G. Arnold, A. Saleh, and D. B. Jaynes. 2005. Development and application of SWAT to landscapes with tiles and potholes. Trans. ASAE 48(3): 1121-1133. (Pubitemid 41138597)
7. Gassman, P. W., M. R. Reyes, C. H. Green, and J. G. Arnold. 2007. The soil and water assessment tool: Historical development, applications, and future directions. Trans. ASABE 50(4): 1211-1250. (Pubitemid 47425666)
8. Gupta, H. V., S. Sorooshian, and P. O. Yapo. 1999. Status of automatic calibration for hydrologic models: Comparison with multilevel expert calibration. J. Hydrol. Eng. 4(2): 135-143. (Pubitemid 29340857)
9. Harmel, R. D., R. J. Cooper, R. M. Slade, R. L. Haney, and J. G. Arnold. 2006. Cumulative uncertainty in measured streamflow and water quality data for small watersheds. Trans. ASABE 49(3): 689-701. (Pubitemid 44427016)
10. He, X, M. J. Vepraskas, R. W. Skaggs, and D. L. Lindbo. 2002. Adapting a drainage model to simulate water table levels in Coastal Plain soils. SSSA J. 66(5): 1722-1731.
11. Hudak, P. F. 1994. Effective porosity of unconsolidated sand: Estimation and impact on capture zone geometry. Environ. Geol. 24(2): 140-143. (Pubitemid 290095)
12. Madramootoo, C. A., J. W. Kaluli, and G. T. Dodds. 1999. Simulating nitrogen dynamics under water table management systems with DRAINMOD-N. Trans. ASAE 42(4): 965-973. (Pubitemid 30257995)
13. Moriasi, D. N., J. G. Arnold, M. W. Van Liew, R. L. Bingner, R. D. Harmel, and T. L. Veith. 2007. Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Trans. ASABE 50(3): 885-900. (Pubitemid 47074809)
14. Moriasi, D. N., J. G. Arnold, G. G. Vazquez-Amábile, B. A. Engel, and C. G. Rossi. 2009. Incorporation of a new shallow water table depth algorithm into SWAT2005. Trans. ASABE 52(3): 771-784.
15. Motovilov, Y. G., L. Gottschalk, K. England, and A. Rodhe. 1999. Validation of distributed hydrological model against spatial observations. Agric. Forest Meteorol. 98-99: 257-277. (Pubitemid 30071118)
16. Nash, J. E., and J. V. Sutcliffe. 1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual models: Part 1. A discussion of principles. J. Hydrol. 10(3): 282-290.
17. Neitsch, S. L., J. G. Arnold, J. R. Kiniry, J. R. Williams, and K. W. King. 2002. Soil and Water Assessment Tool Theoretical Documentation, Version 2000. GSWRL Report 02-01, BRC Report 02-05, TR-191. College Station, Tex.: Texas Water Resources Institute.
18. NRCS. 1996. National Soil Survey Handbook. Title 430-VI. Washington, D.C.: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service.
19. Skaggs, R. W. 1980. Methods for design and evaluation of drainage-water management systems for soils with high water tables. DRAINMOD Reference Report. Fort Worth, Tex.: USDA-SCS South National Technical Center.
20. Vazquez-Amábile, G., and B. A. Engel. 2005. Use of SWAT to compute groundwater table depth and stream flow in the Muscatatuck River watershed. Trans. ASAE 48(3): 991-1003. (Pubitemid 41138586)