Small scale macrophyte-environment relationship in an oxbow-lake of the Upper-Tisza valley (Hungary)

Community Ecology

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 259-263

  Lukacs B ^a   Devai Gy ^b   Tothmeresz B ^b  

^a BALATON LIMNOLOGICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Hungary)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DEBRECEN   (Hungary)

Author keywords

DCCA; Deep pond; Fine scale vegetation analysis; Relev s; Water chemical variables

Indexed keywords

ALKALINITY; CANONICAL ANALYSIS; CHLOROPHYLL A; CORRESPONDENCE ANALYSIS; DEEP WATER; DISSOLVED MATTER; MACROPHYTE; OXBOW LAKE; PH; PHOSPHORUS; PHYTOSOCIOLOGY; SPECIES-AREA RELATIONSHIP; SULFATE; VEGETATION STRUCTURE; WATER CHEMISTRY;

HUNGARY; SZABOLCS-SZATMAR-BEREG; UPPER TISZA VALLEY;

EID: 81755172119     PISSN: 15858553     EISSN: 15882756     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1556/ComEc.12.2011.2.15     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Barendregt, A. and A.M.F. Bio. 2003. Relevant variables to predict macrophyte communities in running waters. Ecol. Model. 160: 205-217. (Pubitemid 36251037)
2. Borhidi, A. 2003. Magyarország Növénytá rsulásai. (Plant Communities in Hungary). Akadémiai Könyvkiadó, Budapest. In Hungarian.
3. Braun-Blanquet, J. 1951. Pflanzensoziologie. Springer Verlag, Wien.
4. Cade, B.S. and J.D. Richards. 1996. Permutation tests for least absolute deviation regression. Biometrics 52: 886-902. (Pubitemid 26296066)
5. Dévai, Gy., I. Dévai, L. Felföldy and I. Wittner. 1992. A general concept of water quality. Part 3. (In Hungarian). Acta Biol. Debr. Oecol. Hung. 4: 49-185.
6. Dévai, Gy., P. Végvári, S. Nagy, I. Bancsi, Z. Müller, Z. Csabai, E. Bárdosi, Sz. Gõri, I. Grigorszki, M.B. Györiné, P. Juhász, K.M. Kaszáné, Sz.E. Kelemenné, B. Kiss, P. Kovács, K. Macalik, A. Móra, P. Olajos, M. Miskolczi, N.M. Teszárné, A. Tóth, I. Turcsányi and K. Zsuga. 1998. Ecological water quality of the backwater Boroszló-kerti-Holt-Tisza. Acta Biol. Debr. Oecol. Hung. 10: 13-216.
7. Frodge, J.D., G.L. Thomas and G.B. Pauley. 1990. Effects of canopy formation by floating and submergent aquatic macrophytes on the water quality of two shallow Pacific Northwest lakes. Aquat. Bot. 38: 231-248.
8. Hájková, P., P. Wolf and M. Hájek. 2004. Environmental factors and Carpathian spring fen vegetation: the importance of scale and temporal variation. Ann. Bot. Fenn. 41: 249-262. (Pubitemid 39239290)
9. Heegaard, E., H.H. Birks, C.E. Gibson, S.J. Smith and S. Wolfe-Murphy 2001. Species-environmental relationships of aquatic macrophytes in Northern Ireland. Aquat. Bot. 70: 175-223. (Pubitemid 32525253)
10. Klosowski, S. 2006. The relationship between environmental factors and the submerged Potametea associations in lakes of northeastern Poland. Hydrobiologia. 560: 15-29.
11. Lee, P.F. and K.A. McNaughton. 2004. Macrophyte induced microchemical changes in the water column of a northern Boreal Lake. Hydrobiologia 522: 207-220. (Pubitemid 39066897)
12. LepŠ, J. and P. Šmilauer. 2003. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data Using CANOCO, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
13. Lukács, B.A., Gy. Dévai and B. Tóthmé rész. 2009. Aquatic macrophytes as bioindicators of water chemistry in nutrient rich backwaters along the Upper-Tisza river (in Hungary). Phytocoenologia 39: 287-293.
14. Murphy, K. J. 2002. Plant communities and plant diversity in softwater lakes of northern Europe. Aquat. Bot. 73: 287-324. (Pubitemid 34790224)
15. Navrátilová, J. and J. Navrátil. 2005. Vegetation gradients in fish ponds mires in relation seasonal fluctuations in environmental factors. Preslia 77: 405-418. (Pubitemid 43273631)
16. Penning W.E., B. Dudley, M. Mjelde, S. Hellsten, J. Hanganu, A. Kolada, M. van den Berg, H. Maemets, S. Poikane, G. Phillips, N Willby and F. Ecke. 2008. Using aquatic macrophyte community indices to define the ecological status of European lakes. Aquat. Ecol. 42: 253-264.
17. Schaumburg J, C. Schranz, G. Hofmann, D. Stelzer, S. Schneider and U. Schmedtje. 2004. Macrophytes and phytobenthos as indicators of ecological status in German lakes-a contribution to the implementation of the Water Framework Directive. Limnologica 34: 302-314. (Pubitemid 40102829)
18. Simon, T. 2000. A magyarországi edényes flóra határozója. (Vascular Flora of Hungary.) Nemzeti Tankönyvkiadó, Budapest. In Hungarian.
19. Somodi, I. and Z. Botta-Dukát. 2004. Determinants of floating island vegetation and succession in a recently flooded shallow lake, Kis-Balaton (Hungary). Aquat. Bot. 79: 357-366. (Pubitemid 38958513)
20. ter Braak, C.J.F. and P. Šmilauer. 1998. CANOCO Reference Manual and User's Guide to Canoco for Windows. Centre for Biometry, Wageningen.
21. Toivonen, H. and P. Huttunen. 1995. Aquatic macrophytes and ecological gradients in 57 small lakes in southern Finland. Aquat. Bot. 51: 197-221 (Pubitemid 26447890)
22. Tóth, A. and M. Braun. 1995. The relationship of water chemistry and vegetation patchiness on a marsh in N.E. Hungary. Arch. Hydrobiol. 135: 233-241. (Pubitemid 3015869)
23. Tóth, G. L., S. Poikane, W. E. Penning, G. Free, H. Mäemets, A. Kolada and J. Hanganu. 2008. First steps in the Central-Baltic intercalibration exercise on lake macrophytes: where do we start? Aquat. Ecol. 42: 365-275.
24. Vastergaard, O. and K. Sand-Jensen. 2000. Alkalinity and trophic state regulate aquatic plant distribution in Danish lakes. Aquat. Bot. 67: 85-107. (Pubitemid 30304711)
25. Wetzel, R.G. 1975. Limnology. W.B. Saunders, London.
26. Wiegleb, G. 1984. A study of habitat conditions of the macrophytic vegetation in selected river systems in Western Lower Saxony (Federal Republic of Germany). Aquat. Bot. 18: 313-352. (Pubitemid 15274249)
27. Wittner, I., Gy. Dévai, B. Kiss, Z. Müller, M. Miskolczi, S.A. Nagy. 2004. State revelation of backwaters located along the Upper-Tisza-Region. Part 1: State estimation. (In Hungarian with English summary). Hidrol. Közl. 84: 172-175.
28. WFD (2000) Directive 2000/60/EC of the European parliament and the council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy. Official Journal of European Communities L. 327:1-72.