Typological differences in syntactic expressions of path and causation

Routes to Language: Studies in Honor of Melissa Bowerman

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 169-194

  Choi, Soonja ^a  

^a SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 81755169442     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203837924-16     Document Type: Chapter

References (15)

1. Aske, J. (1989). Path predicates in English and Spanish: A closer look. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 1-14). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
2. Berman, R., & Slobin, D. I. (1994). Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Choi, S., & Bowerman, M. (1991). Learning to express motion events in English and Korean: The influence of language-specific lexicalization patterns. Cognition, 41, 83-121.
4. Dowty, D. R. (1991). Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language, 67, 547-619.
5. Hohenstein, J. M., Naigles, L. R., & Eisenberg, A. R. (2004). Keeping verb acquisition in motion: A comparison of English and Spanish. In D. G. Hall & S. Waxman (Eds.), Weaving a lexicon (pp. 569-602). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Mayer, M. (1969). Frog, where are you? New York: Dial Press.
7. Muehleisen, V., & Imai, M. (1997). Transitivity and incorporation of ground information in Japanese path verbs. In M. Verspoor, K.D. Lee, & E. Sweetser (Eds.), Lexical and syntactical constructions and the construction of meaning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
8. Naigles, L. R., Eisenberg, A. R., Kako, E. T., Highter, M., & McGraw, N. (1998). Speaking of motion: Verb use in English and Spanish. Language and Cognitive Process, 13, 521-549.
9. Naigles, L. R., & Terrazas, P. (1998). Motion-verb generalizations in English and Spanish: Influences of language and syntax. Psychological Science, 9, 363-369.
10. Ozcaliskan, S., & Slobin, D. I. (1999). Learning how to search for the frog: Expression of manner of motion in English, Spanish, and Turkish. In A. Greenhill et al. (Eds.), The 23rd Proceedings of the Boston University Conference of Language Development(pp. 541-552).
11. Slobin, D. I. (1998). Verbalized events: A dynamic approach to linguistic relativity and determinism. Paper presented at LAUD-Symposium on “Humboldt and Whorf Revisited,” Duisburg, Germany.
12. Slobin, D. I. (2004). The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In S. Stromqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: Vol. 2. Typological and contextual perspectives (pp. 219-257). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Slobin, D. I., & Hoiting, N. (1994). Reference to movement in spoken and signed languages: Typological considerations. In S. Gahl, A. Dolbey, & C. Johnson (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 487-505). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
14. Talmy, L. (1985). Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description: Vol. 3. Grammatical categories and the lexicon (pp. 58-76). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
15. Talmy, L. (1991). Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. In L.A. Sutton & C. Johnson (Eds.), Proceedings of the 17th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 480-519). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.